Cargando…

TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis

One of the most serious complications following joint replacement surgeries are periprosthetic infections (PIs) arising from the adhesion of bacteria to the artificial joint. Various types of titanium–aluminum–vanadium (TiAl6V4) alloy surface modifications (coatings with silver (Ag), titanium nitrid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H., Wolrab, Lukas, Eck, Nicole, Dyer, Nigel P., Bödendorfer, Benjamin, Lohberger, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020036
_version_ 1783700693229502464
author Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H.
Wolrab, Lukas
Eck, Nicole
Dyer, Nigel P.
Bödendorfer, Benjamin
Lohberger, Birgit
author_facet Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H.
Wolrab, Lukas
Eck, Nicole
Dyer, Nigel P.
Bödendorfer, Benjamin
Lohberger, Birgit
author_sort Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H.
collection PubMed
description One of the most serious complications following joint replacement surgeries are periprosthetic infections (PIs) arising from the adhesion of bacteria to the artificial joint. Various types of titanium–aluminum–vanadium (TiAl6V4) alloy surface modifications (coatings with silver (Ag), titanium nitride (TiN), pure titanium (cpTi), combinations of cpTi and hydroxyapatite (HA), combinations of cpTi and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and a rough-blasted surface of TiAl6V4) have been investigated to assess their effects on biofilm development. Biofilms were grown, collected, and analyzed after 48 h to measure their protein and glucose content and the cell viability. Biofilm-associated genes were also monitored after 48 h of development. There was a distinct difference in the development of staphylococcal biofilms on the surfaces of the different types of alloy. According to the findings of this study, the base alloy TiAl6V4 and the TiN-coated surface are the most promising materials for biofilm reduction. Rough surfaces are most favorable when it comes to bacterial infections because they allow an easy attachment of pathogenic organisms. Of all rough surfaces tested, rough-blasted TiAl6V4 was the most favorable as an implantation material; all the other rough surfaces showed more distinct signs of inducing the development of biofilms which displayed higher protein and polysaccharide contents. These results are supported by RT-qPCR measurements of biofilm associated genes for Staphylococcus aureus (icaA, icaC, fnbA, fnbB, clfB, atl) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (atle, aap).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8162351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81623512021-05-29 TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H. Wolrab, Lukas Eck, Nicole Dyer, Nigel P. Bödendorfer, Benjamin Lohberger, Birgit J Funct Biomater Article One of the most serious complications following joint replacement surgeries are periprosthetic infections (PIs) arising from the adhesion of bacteria to the artificial joint. Various types of titanium–aluminum–vanadium (TiAl6V4) alloy surface modifications (coatings with silver (Ag), titanium nitride (TiN), pure titanium (cpTi), combinations of cpTi and hydroxyapatite (HA), combinations of cpTi and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and a rough-blasted surface of TiAl6V4) have been investigated to assess their effects on biofilm development. Biofilms were grown, collected, and analyzed after 48 h to measure their protein and glucose content and the cell viability. Biofilm-associated genes were also monitored after 48 h of development. There was a distinct difference in the development of staphylococcal biofilms on the surfaces of the different types of alloy. According to the findings of this study, the base alloy TiAl6V4 and the TiN-coated surface are the most promising materials for biofilm reduction. Rough surfaces are most favorable when it comes to bacterial infections because they allow an easy attachment of pathogenic organisms. Of all rough surfaces tested, rough-blasted TiAl6V4 was the most favorable as an implantation material; all the other rough surfaces showed more distinct signs of inducing the development of biofilms which displayed higher protein and polysaccharide contents. These results are supported by RT-qPCR measurements of biofilm associated genes for Staphylococcus aureus (icaA, icaC, fnbA, fnbB, clfB, atl) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (atle, aap). MDPI 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8162351/ /pubmed/34069837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020036 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paulitsch-Fuchs, Astrid H.
Wolrab, Lukas
Eck, Nicole
Dyer, Nigel P.
Bödendorfer, Benjamin
Lohberger, Birgit
TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title_full TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title_fullStr TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title_full_unstemmed TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title_short TiAl6V4 Alloy Surface Modifications and Their Impact on Biofilm Development of S. aureus and S. epidermidis
title_sort tial6v4 alloy surface modifications and their impact on biofilm development of s. aureus and s. epidermidis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34069837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020036
work_keys_str_mv AT paulitschfuchsastridh tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis
AT wolrablukas tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis
AT ecknicole tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis
AT dyernigelp tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis
AT bodendorferbenjamin tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis
AT lohbergerbirgit tial6v4alloysurfacemodificationsandtheirimpactonbiofilmdevelopmentofsaureusandsepidermidis