Cargando…

Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron

Ambient-stable fluorescent radicals have recently emerged as promising luminescent materials; however, tailoring their properties has been difficult due to the limited photophysical understanding of open-shell organic systems. Here we report the experimental and computational analysis of a redox pai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehrmann, Caleb M., Imran, Muhammad, Pointer, Craig, Fredin, Lisa A., Young, Elizabeth R., Chen, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc04211k
_version_ 1783700714852188160
author Wehrmann, Caleb M.
Imran, Muhammad
Pointer, Craig
Fredin, Lisa A.
Young, Elizabeth R.
Chen, Mark S.
author_facet Wehrmann, Caleb M.
Imran, Muhammad
Pointer, Craig
Fredin, Lisa A.
Young, Elizabeth R.
Chen, Mark S.
author_sort Wehrmann, Caleb M.
collection PubMed
description Ambient-stable fluorescent radicals have recently emerged as promising luminescent materials; however, tailoring their properties has been difficult due to the limited photophysical understanding of open-shell organic systems. Here we report the experimental and computational analysis of a redox pair of π-conjugated fluorescent molecules that differ by one electron. A π-dication (DC) and π-radical cation (RC) demonstrate different absorption spectra, but similar red emission (λ(emiss,max) = ∼630 nm), excitation maxima (λ(exc,max) = ∼530 nm), fluorescence lifetimes (1–10 ns), and even excited-state (non-emissive) lifetimes when measured by transient absorption spectroscopy. Despite their experimental similarities, time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) studies reveal that DC and RC emission mechanisms are distinct and rely on different electronic transitions. Excited-state reorganization occurs by hole relaxation in singlet DC, while doublet RC undergoes a Jahn-Teller distortion by bending its π-backbone in order to facilitate spin-pairing between singly occupied molecular orbitals. This relationship between the excited-state dynamics of RC and its π-backbone geometry illustrates a potential strategy for developing π-conjugated radicals with new emission properties. Additionally, by comparing TDDFT and CIS (configuration interaction singles) excitations, we show that unrestricted TDDFT accurately reproduces experimental absorption spectra and provides an opportunity to examine the relaxed excited-state properties of large open-shell molecules like RC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8162447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81624472021-06-04 Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron Wehrmann, Caleb M. Imran, Muhammad Pointer, Craig Fredin, Lisa A. Young, Elizabeth R. Chen, Mark S. Chem Sci Chemistry Ambient-stable fluorescent radicals have recently emerged as promising luminescent materials; however, tailoring their properties has been difficult due to the limited photophysical understanding of open-shell organic systems. Here we report the experimental and computational analysis of a redox pair of π-conjugated fluorescent molecules that differ by one electron. A π-dication (DC) and π-radical cation (RC) demonstrate different absorption spectra, but similar red emission (λ(emiss,max) = ∼630 nm), excitation maxima (λ(exc,max) = ∼530 nm), fluorescence lifetimes (1–10 ns), and even excited-state (non-emissive) lifetimes when measured by transient absorption spectroscopy. Despite their experimental similarities, time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) studies reveal that DC and RC emission mechanisms are distinct and rely on different electronic transitions. Excited-state reorganization occurs by hole relaxation in singlet DC, while doublet RC undergoes a Jahn-Teller distortion by bending its π-backbone in order to facilitate spin-pairing between singly occupied molecular orbitals. This relationship between the excited-state dynamics of RC and its π-backbone geometry illustrates a potential strategy for developing π-conjugated radicals with new emission properties. Additionally, by comparing TDDFT and CIS (configuration interaction singles) excitations, we show that unrestricted TDDFT accurately reproduces experimental absorption spectra and provides an opportunity to examine the relaxed excited-state properties of large open-shell molecules like RC. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8162447/ /pubmed/34094286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc04211k Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Wehrmann, Caleb M.
Imran, Muhammad
Pointer, Craig
Fredin, Lisa A.
Young, Elizabeth R.
Chen, Mark S.
Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title_full Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title_fullStr Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title_full_unstemmed Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title_short Spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
title_sort spin multiplicity effects in doublet versus singlet emission: the photophysical consequences of a single electron
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0sc04211k
work_keys_str_mv AT wehrmanncalebm spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron
AT imranmuhammad spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron
AT pointercraig spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron
AT fredinlisaa spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron
AT youngelizabethr spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron
AT chenmarks spinmultiplicityeffectsindoubletversussingletemissionthephotophysicalconsequencesofasingleelectron