Cargando…

A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between antibiotic combination therapy and in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in two tertiary ICUs in different countries. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ICUs of two tertiary hospitals, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torisson, Gustav, Bruun Madsen, Martin, Schmidt Davidsen, Agnes, Perner, Anders, Lipman, Jeffrey, Dulhunty, Joel, Sjövall, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000383
_version_ 1783700728495210496
author Torisson, Gustav
Bruun Madsen, Martin
Schmidt Davidsen, Agnes
Perner, Anders
Lipman, Jeffrey
Dulhunty, Joel
Sjövall, Fredrik
author_facet Torisson, Gustav
Bruun Madsen, Martin
Schmidt Davidsen, Agnes
Perner, Anders
Lipman, Jeffrey
Dulhunty, Joel
Sjövall, Fredrik
author_sort Torisson, Gustav
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between antibiotic combination therapy and in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in two tertiary ICUs in different countries. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ICUs of two tertiary hospitals, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. PATIENTS: Adult patients with antibiotic treatment greater than or equal to 72 hours and vasopressor therapy greater than or equal to 24 hours. INTERVENTION: Combination versus mono antibiotic therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Combination antibiotic therapy was defined as receiving two or more antibiotics from different classes, started within 12 hours of each other and with an overlapping duration of greater than or equal to 12 hours. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed comparing combination antibiotic therapy versus antibiotic monotherapy on in-hospital mortality. The analysis was adjusted for age, gender, centre, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and chronic health evaluation. In total, 1,667 patients were included with 953 (57%) receiving combination therapy. Patients given combination therapy were older (60 ± 16 vs 56 ± 18), more likely admitted to Rigshospitalet (58% vs 16%), and had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (26 ± 8 vs 23 ± 8). Combination therapy was associated with an increased mortality in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07–1.66); however, there was no significant association in the adjusted analysis (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.68–1.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, no association was found between use of combination therapy and in-hospital mortality. The large differences between centers probably reflect local traditions and lack of definitive evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8162507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81625072021-06-01 A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock Torisson, Gustav Bruun Madsen, Martin Schmidt Davidsen, Agnes Perner, Anders Lipman, Jeffrey Dulhunty, Joel Sjövall, Fredrik Crit Care Explor Observational Study OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between antibiotic combination therapy and in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in two tertiary ICUs in different countries. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ICUs of two tertiary hospitals, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. PATIENTS: Adult patients with antibiotic treatment greater than or equal to 72 hours and vasopressor therapy greater than or equal to 24 hours. INTERVENTION: Combination versus mono antibiotic therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Combination antibiotic therapy was defined as receiving two or more antibiotics from different classes, started within 12 hours of each other and with an overlapping duration of greater than or equal to 12 hours. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed comparing combination antibiotic therapy versus antibiotic monotherapy on in-hospital mortality. The analysis was adjusted for age, gender, centre, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and chronic health evaluation. In total, 1,667 patients were included with 953 (57%) receiving combination therapy. Patients given combination therapy were older (60 ± 16 vs 56 ± 18), more likely admitted to Rigshospitalet (58% vs 16%), and had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (26 ± 8 vs 23 ± 8). Combination therapy was associated with an increased mortality in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07–1.66); however, there was no significant association in the adjusted analysis (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.68–1.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, no association was found between use of combination therapy and in-hospital mortality. The large differences between centers probably reflect local traditions and lack of definitive evidence. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8162507/ /pubmed/34079939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000383 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Torisson, Gustav
Bruun Madsen, Martin
Schmidt Davidsen, Agnes
Perner, Anders
Lipman, Jeffrey
Dulhunty, Joel
Sjövall, Fredrik
A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title_full A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title_fullStr A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title_short A Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes Associated With Antibiotic Combination Versus Monotherapy in Patients With Septic Shock
title_sort multicenter observational study evaluating outcomes associated with antibiotic combination versus monotherapy in patients with septic shock
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000383
work_keys_str_mv AT torissongustav amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT bruunmadsenmartin amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT schmidtdavidsenagnes amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT perneranders amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT lipmanjeffrey amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT dulhuntyjoel amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT sjovallfredrik amulticenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT torissongustav multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT bruunmadsenmartin multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT schmidtdavidsenagnes multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT perneranders multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT lipmanjeffrey multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT dulhuntyjoel multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock
AT sjovallfredrik multicenterobservationalstudyevaluatingoutcomesassociatedwithantibioticcombinationversusmonotherapyinpatientswithsepticshock