Cargando…

Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE: CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with poor prognosis with a median survival of about 2.5 months. Data demonstrating best prophylactic strategy remain controversial and need further definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present data of 110 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faqah, Anadil, Asif, Summaiya, Goksu, Suleyman Yasin, Sheikh, Hassan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00422
_version_ 1783700730168737792
author Faqah, Anadil
Asif, Summaiya
Goksu, Suleyman Yasin
Sheikh, Hassan S.
author_facet Faqah, Anadil
Asif, Summaiya
Goksu, Suleyman Yasin
Sheikh, Hassan S.
author_sort Faqah, Anadil
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with poor prognosis with a median survival of about 2.5 months. Data demonstrating best prophylactic strategy remain controversial and need further definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present data of 110 patients with DLBCL treated with standard systemic therapy divided into four groups based on primary CNS prophylaxis strategy and CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk categories. We compared their 3-year CNS relapse rate and overall survival in each group. RESULTS: The CNS prophylaxis strategy consisted of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) in group 1, high-dose (HD) MTX in group 2, combination IT and HD MTX in group 3, and IT and/or HD MTX with intensive chemotherapy in group 4. At 3 years, CNS relapse rate was 8.6% (4/46), 8.3% (1/12), 4.8% (2/42), and 18% (2/11) in groups 1-4 (P = .64), respectively. According to CNS IPI, the CNS relapse rate was 16.6%, 10.1%, and 0% in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 69%, 75%, 80%, and 45% in groups 1-4 (P = .71), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study while did not find statistical significance did indicate a lower incidence of CNS relapse with the addition of systemic HD MTX to IT MTX in the high-risk DLBCL population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8162514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81625142021-06-01 Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Faqah, Anadil Asif, Summaiya Goksu, Suleyman Yasin Sheikh, Hassan S. JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with poor prognosis with a median survival of about 2.5 months. Data demonstrating best prophylactic strategy remain controversial and need further definition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present data of 110 patients with DLBCL treated with standard systemic therapy divided into four groups based on primary CNS prophylaxis strategy and CNS International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk categories. We compared their 3-year CNS relapse rate and overall survival in each group. RESULTS: The CNS prophylaxis strategy consisted of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) in group 1, high-dose (HD) MTX in group 2, combination IT and HD MTX in group 3, and IT and/or HD MTX with intensive chemotherapy in group 4. At 3 years, CNS relapse rate was 8.6% (4/46), 8.3% (1/12), 4.8% (2/42), and 18% (2/11) in groups 1-4 (P = .64), respectively. According to CNS IPI, the CNS relapse rate was 16.6%, 10.1%, and 0% in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 69%, 75%, 80%, and 45% in groups 1-4 (P = .71), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study while did not find statistical significance did indicate a lower incidence of CNS relapse with the addition of systemic HD MTX to IT MTX in the high-risk DLBCL population. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8162514/ /pubmed/33835825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00422 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Faqah, Anadil
Asif, Summaiya
Goksu, Suleyman Yasin
Sheikh, Hassan S.
Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title_full Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title_fullStr Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title_short Real-World Data (RWD) on the 3-Year Follow-Up Outcomes of Different CNS Prophylaxis Strategies Across CNS-IPI Risk Groups in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
title_sort real-world data (rwd) on the 3-year follow-up outcomes of different cns prophylaxis strategies across cns-ipi risk groups in patients with diffuse large b-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00422
work_keys_str_mv AT faqahanadil realworlddatarwdonthe3yearfollowupoutcomesofdifferentcnsprophylaxisstrategiesacrosscnsipiriskgroupsinpatientswithdiffuselargebcellnonhodgkinlymphoma
AT asifsummaiya realworlddatarwdonthe3yearfollowupoutcomesofdifferentcnsprophylaxisstrategiesacrosscnsipiriskgroupsinpatientswithdiffuselargebcellnonhodgkinlymphoma
AT goksusuleymanyasin realworlddatarwdonthe3yearfollowupoutcomesofdifferentcnsprophylaxisstrategiesacrosscnsipiriskgroupsinpatientswithdiffuselargebcellnonhodgkinlymphoma
AT sheikhhassans realworlddatarwdonthe3yearfollowupoutcomesofdifferentcnsprophylaxisstrategiesacrosscnsipiriskgroupsinpatientswithdiffuselargebcellnonhodgkinlymphoma