Cargando…

Urine concentrating defect as presenting sign of progressive renal failure in Bardet–Biedl syndrome patients

BACKGROUND: Urine concentrating defect is a common dysfunction in ciliopathies, even though its underlying mechanism and its prognostic meaning are largely unknown. This study assesses renal function in a cohort of 54 Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS) individuals and analyses whether renal hyposthenuria i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zacchia, Miriam, Blanco, Francesca Del Vecchio, Torella, Annalaura, Raucci, Raffaele, Blasio, Giancarlo, Onore, Maria Elena, Marchese, Emanuela, Trepiccione, Francesco, Vitagliano, Caterina, Iorio, Valentina Di, Alessandra, Perna, Simonelli, Francesca, Nigro, Vincenzo, Capasso, Giovambattista, Viggiano, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa182
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Urine concentrating defect is a common dysfunction in ciliopathies, even though its underlying mechanism and its prognostic meaning are largely unknown. This study assesses renal function in a cohort of 54 Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS) individuals and analyses whether renal hyposthenuria is the result of specific tubule dysfunction and predicts renal disease progression. METHODS: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) and maximum urine osmolality (max-Uosm) were measured in all patients. Genetic analysis was conducted in 43 patients. Annual eGFR decline (ΔeGFR) was measured in patients with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years. Urine aquaporin-2 (uAQP2) excretion was measured and the furosemide test was performed in patients and controls. RESULTS: At baseline, 33 (61.1%), 12 (22.2%) and 9 (16.7%) patients showed an eGFR >90, 60–90 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; 27.3% showed an ACR >30 mg/g and 55.8% of patients showed urine concentrating defect in the absence of renal insufficiency. Baseline eGFR, but not max-Uosm, correlated negatively with age. Conversely, truncating mutations affected max-Uosm and showed a trend towards a reduction in eGFR. Max-Uosm correlated with ΔeGFR (P < 0.005), suggesting that urine concentrating defect may predict disease progression. uAQP2 excretion and Na(+) and Cl(−) fractional excretion after furosemide did not differ between hyposthenuric patients and controls, suggesting that specific collecting duct and thick ascending limb dysfunctions are unlikely to play a central role in the pathogenesis of hyposthenuria. CONCLUSIONS: Hyposthenuria is a warning sign predicting poor renal outcome in BBS. The pathophysiology of this defect is most likely beyond defective tubular function.