Cargando…

Consensus on the Treatment and Follow-Up for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Report From the First Global Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries (PCCCDC)

PURPOSE: To present a summary of the recommendations for the treatment and follow-up for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 physicians working in the field of prostate cancer in developing countries who attended the Prostate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maluf, Fernando Cotait, Pereira, Felipe Moraes Toledo, Silva, Adriano Gonçalves, Dettino, Aldo Lourenço Abbade, Cardoso, Ana Paula Garcia, Sasse, André Seeke, Soares, Andrey, Kann, Ariel Galapo, Herchenhorn, Daniel, Jardim, Denis Leonardo Fontes, Cortés, Diego Emilio Lopera, Kater, Fábio Roberto, Morbeck, Igor A. Protzner, Reolon, João Francisco Navarro, Rinck Jr, José Augusto, Zarbá, Juan Jose, Sade, Juan Pablo, da Trindade, Karine Martins, Costa, Leonardo Atem G. A., dos Santos, Lucas V., Maia, Manuel Caitano, Siqueira, Mariana Bruno, Gillessen, Silke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33856891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00511
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To present a summary of the recommendations for the treatment and follow-up for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 physicians working in the field of prostate cancer in developing countries who attended the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. METHODS: A total of 106 questions out of more than 300 questions addressed the use of imaging in staging mCRPC, treatment recommendations across availability and response to prior drug treatments, appropriate drug treatments, and follow-up, and those same scenarios when limited resources needed to be considered. Responses were compiled and the percentages were presented by clinicians to support each response. Most questions had five to seven relevant options for response including abstain and/or unqualified to answer, or in the case of yes or no questions, the option to abstain was offered. RESULTS: Most of the recommendations from this panel were in line with prior consensus, including the preference of a new antiandrogen for first-line therapy of mCRPC. Important aspects highlighted in the scenario of limited resources included the option of docetaxel as treatment preference as first-line treatment in several scenarios, docetaxel retreatment, consideration for reduced doses of abiraterone, and alternative schedules of an osteoclast-targeted therapy. CONCLUSION: There was wide-ranging consensus in the treatment for men with mCRPC in both optimal and limited resource settings.