Cargando…

Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach

Globalization has led to an increasing emphasis on the critical role of the workforce in the success of organizations. This has resulted in the shift of focus on human resource development (HRD) as the center of attention in the current paradigm. Hence, this article suggests a need to use a comprehe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mumtaz, Sana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01174-y
_version_ 1783700897441775616
author Mumtaz, Sana
author_facet Mumtaz, Sana
author_sort Mumtaz, Sana
collection PubMed
description Globalization has led to an increasing emphasis on the critical role of the workforce in the success of organizations. This has resulted in the shift of focus on human resource development (HRD) as the center of attention in the current paradigm. Hence, this article suggests a need to use a comprehensive philosophical paradigm to develop practical theories in HRD and compares the usefulness of positivism, interpretivism and pragmatism philosophies in the theory-building process. Based on fragmented literature in philosophy and HRD disciplines, this theoretical manuscript has assembled and thoroughly reviewed the existing literature to propose new ways of theory building in HRD. The findings guide that despite the usefulness of positivism and interpretivism philosophical paradigms in knowledge generation, these philosophies lead to practically weak theories. Hence, theory building in HRD should be driven by a problem-solving approach rather than only relying on plausibility criteria. It further guides how multi-method and mixed-method research designs might help provide answers to complex and newly emerged challenges in HRD. Overall, this research adds value to a body of knowledge by proposing a unique five-stage framework to develop new theories in HRD using the pragmatism approach. The use of the proposed framework might be beneficial in developing practically and theoretically useful theories in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8163364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81633642021-06-02 Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach Mumtaz, Sana Qual Quant Article Globalization has led to an increasing emphasis on the critical role of the workforce in the success of organizations. This has resulted in the shift of focus on human resource development (HRD) as the center of attention in the current paradigm. Hence, this article suggests a need to use a comprehensive philosophical paradigm to develop practical theories in HRD and compares the usefulness of positivism, interpretivism and pragmatism philosophies in the theory-building process. Based on fragmented literature in philosophy and HRD disciplines, this theoretical manuscript has assembled and thoroughly reviewed the existing literature to propose new ways of theory building in HRD. The findings guide that despite the usefulness of positivism and interpretivism philosophical paradigms in knowledge generation, these philosophies lead to practically weak theories. Hence, theory building in HRD should be driven by a problem-solving approach rather than only relying on plausibility criteria. It further guides how multi-method and mixed-method research designs might help provide answers to complex and newly emerged challenges in HRD. Overall, this research adds value to a body of knowledge by proposing a unique five-stage framework to develop new theories in HRD using the pragmatism approach. The use of the proposed framework might be beneficial in developing practically and theoretically useful theories in the future. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8163364/ /pubmed/34092816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01174-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Mumtaz, Sana
Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title_full Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title_fullStr Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title_full_unstemmed Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title_short Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach
title_sort should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in hrd? traditional versus pragmatism approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01174-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mumtazsana shouldpracticalusefulnessbeconsideredfortheorybuildinginhrdtraditionalversuspragmatismapproach