Cargando…

A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study

BACKGROUND: Different interventions and treatments are available for growth-restricted newborns to improve neonatal and long-term outcomes. Lack of outcome standardization across trials of feeding interventions limits pooled analysis of intervention effects. This study aimed to develop a core outcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damhuis, Stefanie E., Bloomfield, Frank H., Khalil, Asma, Daly, Mandy, Ganzevoort, Wessel, Gordijn, Sanne J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01119-5
_version_ 1783700940128256000
author Damhuis, Stefanie E.
Bloomfield, Frank H.
Khalil, Asma
Daly, Mandy
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
author_facet Damhuis, Stefanie E.
Bloomfield, Frank H.
Khalil, Asma
Daly, Mandy
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
author_sort Damhuis, Stefanie E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different interventions and treatments are available for growth-restricted newborns to improve neonatal and long-term outcomes. Lack of outcome standardization across trials of feeding interventions limits pooled analysis of intervention effects. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) and minimum reporting set (MRS) for this research field. METHODS: A scoping search identified relevant outcomes and baseline characteristics. These outcomes were presented to two stakeholder groups (lay experience and professional experts) in three rounds of online Delphi surveys. The professional experts were involved in the development of the MRS. All items were rated for their importance on a 5-point Likert scale and re-rated in subsequent rounds after presentation of the results at the group level. During a face-to-face consensus meeting the final COS and MRS were determined. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 53 experts (89%) who completed the first round completed all three survey rounds. After the consensus meeting, consensus was reached on 19 outcomes and 17 baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A COS and MRS for feeding interventions in the newborn after growth restriction were developed. Use of these sets will promote uniform reporting of study characteristics and improve data synthesis and meta-analysis of multiple studies. IMPACT: Both a COS and MRS for growth restriction in the newborn were developed. This study provides the first international combined health-care professional and patient consensus on outcomes and baseline characteristics for intervention and treatment studies in growth-restricted newborns. The use of COS and MRS results in the development of more uniform study protocols, thereby facilitating data synthesis/meta-analysis of multiple studies aiming to optimize treatment and interventions in growth restriction in the newborn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8163598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81635982021-06-14 A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study Damhuis, Stefanie E. Bloomfield, Frank H. Khalil, Asma Daly, Mandy Ganzevoort, Wessel Gordijn, Sanne J. Pediatr Res Quality Improvement Article BACKGROUND: Different interventions and treatments are available for growth-restricted newborns to improve neonatal and long-term outcomes. Lack of outcome standardization across trials of feeding interventions limits pooled analysis of intervention effects. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) and minimum reporting set (MRS) for this research field. METHODS: A scoping search identified relevant outcomes and baseline characteristics. These outcomes were presented to two stakeholder groups (lay experience and professional experts) in three rounds of online Delphi surveys. The professional experts were involved in the development of the MRS. All items were rated for their importance on a 5-point Likert scale and re-rated in subsequent rounds after presentation of the results at the group level. During a face-to-face consensus meeting the final COS and MRS were determined. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 53 experts (89%) who completed the first round completed all three survey rounds. After the consensus meeting, consensus was reached on 19 outcomes and 17 baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A COS and MRS for feeding interventions in the newborn after growth restriction were developed. Use of these sets will promote uniform reporting of study characteristics and improve data synthesis and meta-analysis of multiple studies. IMPACT: Both a COS and MRS for growth restriction in the newborn were developed. This study provides the first international combined health-care professional and patient consensus on outcomes and baseline characteristics for intervention and treatment studies in growth-restricted newborns. The use of COS and MRS results in the development of more uniform study protocols, thereby facilitating data synthesis/meta-analysis of multiple studies aiming to optimize treatment and interventions in growth restriction in the newborn. Nature Publishing Group US 2020-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8163598/ /pubmed/32927468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01119-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Article
Damhuis, Stefanie E.
Bloomfield, Frank H.
Khalil, Asma
Daly, Mandy
Ganzevoort, Wessel
Gordijn, Sanne J.
A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title_full A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title_fullStr A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title_full_unstemmed A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title_short A Core Outcome Set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN: the COSNEON study
title_sort core outcome set and minimum reporting set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the newborn: the cosneon study
topic Quality Improvement Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01119-5
work_keys_str_mv AT damhuisstefaniee acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT bloomfieldfrankh acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT khalilasma acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT dalymandy acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT ganzevoortwessel acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT gordijnsannej acoreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT damhuisstefaniee coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT bloomfieldfrankh coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT khalilasma coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT dalymandy coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT ganzevoortwessel coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy
AT gordijnsannej coreoutcomesetandminimumreportingsetforinterventionstudiesingrowthrestrictioninthenewbornthecosneonstudy