Cargando…

Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease

BACKGROUND: It is not known if genetic background, characteristics at diagnosis, physical and psychological well-being, and adherence to a gluten-free diet are comparable between patients with familial or sporadic celiac disease. These issues were investigated in a follow-up study. METHODS: Altogeth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Airaksinen, Laura, Myllymäki, Lauri, Kaukinen, Katri, Saavalainen, Päivi, Huhtala, Heini, Lindfors, Katri, Kurppa, Kalle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06490-1
_version_ 1783700950147399680
author Airaksinen, Laura
Myllymäki, Lauri
Kaukinen, Katri
Saavalainen, Päivi
Huhtala, Heini
Lindfors, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
author_facet Airaksinen, Laura
Myllymäki, Lauri
Kaukinen, Katri
Saavalainen, Päivi
Huhtala, Heini
Lindfors, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
author_sort Airaksinen, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is not known if genetic background, characteristics at diagnosis, physical and psychological well-being, and adherence to a gluten-free diet are comparable between patients with familial or sporadic celiac disease. These issues were investigated in a follow-up study. METHODS: Altogether 1064 patients were analyzed for celiac disease-associated serology, predisposing HLA-DQ, and non-HLA genotypes. Medical data were collected from patient records and supplementary interviews. Current symptoms and quality of life were further evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Psychological General Well-Being questionnaire (PGWB), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. RESULTS: Familial and sporadic groups differed (P < 0.001) in the reason for diagnosis and clinical presentation at diagnosis, familial patients being more often screen-detected (26% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and having less often gastrointestinal (49% vs. 69%) and severe symptoms (47% vs. 65%). The groups were comparable in terms of histological damage, frequency of malabsorption, comorbidities, childhood diagnoses, and short-term treatment response. At the time of the study, familial cases reported fewer symptoms (21% vs. 30%, P = 0.004) and lower prevalence of all (78% vs. 86%, P = 0.007), neurological (10% vs. 15%, P = 0.013), and dermatological (9% vs. 17%, P = 0.001) comorbidities. Dietary adherence and GSRS scores were comparable, but familial cases had better quality of life according to PGWB and SF-36. High-risk genotype HLA-DQ2.5/DQ2.5 was more frequent among familial cases, and four non-HLA SNPs were associated with familial celiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the greater proportion of high-risk genotypes, familial cases had milder symptoms at presentation than did sporadic cases. Worse experience of symptoms and poorer quality of life in sporadic disease indicate a need for intensified support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-020-06490-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8163668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81636682021-06-17 Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease Airaksinen, Laura Myllymäki, Lauri Kaukinen, Katri Saavalainen, Päivi Huhtala, Heini Lindfors, Katri Kurppa, Kalle Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: It is not known if genetic background, characteristics at diagnosis, physical and psychological well-being, and adherence to a gluten-free diet are comparable between patients with familial or sporadic celiac disease. These issues were investigated in a follow-up study. METHODS: Altogether 1064 patients were analyzed for celiac disease-associated serology, predisposing HLA-DQ, and non-HLA genotypes. Medical data were collected from patient records and supplementary interviews. Current symptoms and quality of life were further evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Psychological General Well-Being questionnaire (PGWB), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. RESULTS: Familial and sporadic groups differed (P < 0.001) in the reason for diagnosis and clinical presentation at diagnosis, familial patients being more often screen-detected (26% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and having less often gastrointestinal (49% vs. 69%) and severe symptoms (47% vs. 65%). The groups were comparable in terms of histological damage, frequency of malabsorption, comorbidities, childhood diagnoses, and short-term treatment response. At the time of the study, familial cases reported fewer symptoms (21% vs. 30%, P = 0.004) and lower prevalence of all (78% vs. 86%, P = 0.007), neurological (10% vs. 15%, P = 0.013), and dermatological (9% vs. 17%, P = 0.001) comorbidities. Dietary adherence and GSRS scores were comparable, but familial cases had better quality of life according to PGWB and SF-36. High-risk genotype HLA-DQ2.5/DQ2.5 was more frequent among familial cases, and four non-HLA SNPs were associated with familial celiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the greater proportion of high-risk genotypes, familial cases had milder symptoms at presentation than did sporadic cases. Worse experience of symptoms and poorer quality of life in sporadic disease indicate a need for intensified support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10620-020-06490-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8163668/ /pubmed/32705440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06490-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Airaksinen, Laura
Myllymäki, Lauri
Kaukinen, Katri
Saavalainen, Päivi
Huhtala, Heini
Lindfors, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title_full Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title_fullStr Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title_full_unstemmed Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title_short Differences Between Familial and Sporadic Celiac Disease
title_sort differences between familial and sporadic celiac disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06490-1
work_keys_str_mv AT airaksinenlaura differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT myllymakilauri differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT kaukinenkatri differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT saavalainenpaivi differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT huhtalaheini differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT lindforskatri differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease
AT kurppakalle differencesbetweenfamilialandsporadicceliacdisease