Cargando…

The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abo-Leyah, Hani, Gallant, Stephanie, Cassidy, Diane, Giam, Yan Hui, Killick, Justin, Marshall, Beth, Hay, Gordon, Snowdon, Caroline, Hothersall, Eleanor J., Pembridge, Thomas, Strachan, Rachel, Gallant, Natalie, Parcell, Benjamin J., George, Jacob, Furrie, Elizabeth, Chalmers, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021
_version_ 1783701024371900416
author Abo-Leyah, Hani
Gallant, Stephanie
Cassidy, Diane
Giam, Yan Hui
Killick, Justin
Marshall, Beth
Hay, Gordon
Snowdon, Caroline
Hothersall, Eleanor J.
Pembridge, Thomas
Strachan, Rachel
Gallant, Natalie
Parcell, Benjamin J.
George, Jacob
Furrie, Elizabeth
Chalmers, James D.
author_facet Abo-Leyah, Hani
Gallant, Stephanie
Cassidy, Diane
Giam, Yan Hui
Killick, Justin
Marshall, Beth
Hay, Gordon
Snowdon, Caroline
Hothersall, Eleanor J.
Pembridge, Thomas
Strachan, Rachel
Gallant, Natalie
Parcell, Benjamin J.
George, Jacob
Furrie, Elizabeth
Chalmers, James D.
author_sort Abo-Leyah, Hani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observational study of HCWs in Scotland (UK) from May to September 2020 was performed. The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay was used to establish seroprevalence in this cohort. Controls, matched for age and sex to the general local population, were studied for comparison. New infections (up to 2 December 2020) post antibody testing were recorded to determine whether the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies protects against re-infection. RESULTS: A total of 2063 health and social care workers were recruited for this study. At enrolment, 300 HCWs had a positive antibody test (14.5%). 11 out of 231 control sera tested positive (4.8%). HCWs therefore had an increased likelihood of a positive test (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.85–6.16; p<0.0001). Dentists were most likely to test positive. 97.3% of patients who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR had positive antibodies. 18.7% had an asymptomatic infection. There were 38 new infections with SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs who were previously antibody negative, and one symptomatic RT-PCR-positive re-infection. The presence of antibodies was therefore associated with an 85% reduced risk of re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.35; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: HCWs were three times more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. Almost all infected individuals developed an antibody response, which was 85% effective in protecting against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81640122021-06-02 The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers Abo-Leyah, Hani Gallant, Stephanie Cassidy, Diane Giam, Yan Hui Killick, Justin Marshall, Beth Hay, Gordon Snowdon, Caroline Hothersall, Eleanor J. Pembridge, Thomas Strachan, Rachel Gallant, Natalie Parcell, Benjamin J. George, Jacob Furrie, Elizabeth Chalmers, James D. ERJ Open Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observational study of HCWs in Scotland (UK) from May to September 2020 was performed. The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay was used to establish seroprevalence in this cohort. Controls, matched for age and sex to the general local population, were studied for comparison. New infections (up to 2 December 2020) post antibody testing were recorded to determine whether the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies protects against re-infection. RESULTS: A total of 2063 health and social care workers were recruited for this study. At enrolment, 300 HCWs had a positive antibody test (14.5%). 11 out of 231 control sera tested positive (4.8%). HCWs therefore had an increased likelihood of a positive test (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.85–6.16; p<0.0001). Dentists were most likely to test positive. 97.3% of patients who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR had positive antibodies. 18.7% had an asymptomatic infection. There were 38 new infections with SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs who were previously antibody negative, and one symptomatic RT-PCR-positive re-infection. The presence of antibodies was therefore associated with an 85% reduced risk of re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.35; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: HCWs were three times more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. Almost all infected individuals developed an antibody response, which was 85% effective in protecting against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. European Respiratory Society 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8164012/ /pubmed/34104643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abo-Leyah, Hani
Gallant, Stephanie
Cassidy, Diane
Giam, Yan Hui
Killick, Justin
Marshall, Beth
Hay, Gordon
Snowdon, Caroline
Hothersall, Eleanor J.
Pembridge, Thomas
Strachan, Rachel
Gallant, Natalie
Parcell, Benjamin J.
George, Jacob
Furrie, Elizabeth
Chalmers, James D.
The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title_full The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title_fullStr The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title_short The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
title_sort protective effect of sars-cov-2 antibodies in scottish healthcare workers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT aboleyahhani theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT gallantstephanie theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT cassidydiane theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT giamyanhui theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT killickjustin theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT marshallbeth theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT haygordon theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT snowdoncaroline theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT hothersalleleanorj theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT pembridgethomas theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT strachanrachel theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT gallantnatalie theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT parcellbenjaminj theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT georgejacob theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT furrieelizabeth theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT chalmersjamesd theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT aboleyahhani protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT gallantstephanie protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT cassidydiane protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT giamyanhui protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT killickjustin protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT marshallbeth protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT haygordon protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT snowdoncaroline protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT hothersalleleanorj protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT pembridgethomas protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT strachanrachel protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT gallantnatalie protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT parcellbenjaminj protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT georgejacob protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT furrieelizabeth protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers
AT chalmersjamesd protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers