Cargando…
The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021 |
_version_ | 1783701024371900416 |
---|---|
author | Abo-Leyah, Hani Gallant, Stephanie Cassidy, Diane Giam, Yan Hui Killick, Justin Marshall, Beth Hay, Gordon Snowdon, Caroline Hothersall, Eleanor J. Pembridge, Thomas Strachan, Rachel Gallant, Natalie Parcell, Benjamin J. George, Jacob Furrie, Elizabeth Chalmers, James D. |
author_facet | Abo-Leyah, Hani Gallant, Stephanie Cassidy, Diane Giam, Yan Hui Killick, Justin Marshall, Beth Hay, Gordon Snowdon, Caroline Hothersall, Eleanor J. Pembridge, Thomas Strachan, Rachel Gallant, Natalie Parcell, Benjamin J. George, Jacob Furrie, Elizabeth Chalmers, James D. |
author_sort | Abo-Leyah, Hani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observational study of HCWs in Scotland (UK) from May to September 2020 was performed. The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay was used to establish seroprevalence in this cohort. Controls, matched for age and sex to the general local population, were studied for comparison. New infections (up to 2 December 2020) post antibody testing were recorded to determine whether the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies protects against re-infection. RESULTS: A total of 2063 health and social care workers were recruited for this study. At enrolment, 300 HCWs had a positive antibody test (14.5%). 11 out of 231 control sera tested positive (4.8%). HCWs therefore had an increased likelihood of a positive test (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.85–6.16; p<0.0001). Dentists were most likely to test positive. 97.3% of patients who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR had positive antibodies. 18.7% had an asymptomatic infection. There were 38 new infections with SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs who were previously antibody negative, and one symptomatic RT-PCR-positive re-infection. The presence of antibodies was therefore associated with an 85% reduced risk of re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.35; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: HCWs were three times more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. Almost all infected individuals developed an antibody response, which was 85% effective in protecting against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81640122021-06-02 The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers Abo-Leyah, Hani Gallant, Stephanie Cassidy, Diane Giam, Yan Hui Killick, Justin Marshall, Beth Hay, Gordon Snowdon, Caroline Hothersall, Eleanor J. Pembridge, Thomas Strachan, Rachel Gallant, Natalie Parcell, Benjamin J. George, Jacob Furrie, Elizabeth Chalmers, James D. ERJ Open Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection. METHODS: A prospective observational study of HCWs in Scotland (UK) from May to September 2020 was performed. The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay was used to establish seroprevalence in this cohort. Controls, matched for age and sex to the general local population, were studied for comparison. New infections (up to 2 December 2020) post antibody testing were recorded to determine whether the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies protects against re-infection. RESULTS: A total of 2063 health and social care workers were recruited for this study. At enrolment, 300 HCWs had a positive antibody test (14.5%). 11 out of 231 control sera tested positive (4.8%). HCWs therefore had an increased likelihood of a positive test (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.85–6.16; p<0.0001). Dentists were most likely to test positive. 97.3% of patients who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR had positive antibodies. 18.7% had an asymptomatic infection. There were 38 new infections with SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs who were previously antibody negative, and one symptomatic RT-PCR-positive re-infection. The presence of antibodies was therefore associated with an 85% reduced risk of re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.35; p=0.026). CONCLUSION: HCWs were three times more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. Almost all infected individuals developed an antibody response, which was 85% effective in protecting against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. European Respiratory Society 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8164012/ /pubmed/34104643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Abo-Leyah, Hani Gallant, Stephanie Cassidy, Diane Giam, Yan Hui Killick, Justin Marshall, Beth Hay, Gordon Snowdon, Caroline Hothersall, Eleanor J. Pembridge, Thomas Strachan, Rachel Gallant, Natalie Parcell, Benjamin J. George, Jacob Furrie, Elizabeth Chalmers, James D. The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title | The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title_full | The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title_fullStr | The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title_full_unstemmed | The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title_short | The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers |
title_sort | protective effect of sars-cov-2 antibodies in scottish healthcare workers |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00080-2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aboleyahhani theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT gallantstephanie theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT cassidydiane theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT giamyanhui theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT killickjustin theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT marshallbeth theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT haygordon theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT snowdoncaroline theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT hothersalleleanorj theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT pembridgethomas theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT strachanrachel theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT gallantnatalie theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT parcellbenjaminj theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT georgejacob theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT furrieelizabeth theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT chalmersjamesd theprotectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT aboleyahhani protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT gallantstephanie protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT cassidydiane protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT giamyanhui protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT killickjustin protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT marshallbeth protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT haygordon protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT snowdoncaroline protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT hothersalleleanorj protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT pembridgethomas protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT strachanrachel protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT gallantnatalie protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT parcellbenjaminj protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT georgejacob protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT furrieelizabeth protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers AT chalmersjamesd protectiveeffectofsarscov2antibodiesinscottishhealthcareworkers |