Cargando…
‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other co...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9 |
_version_ | 1783701034897506304 |
---|---|
author | Marginson, Simon |
author_facet | Marginson, Simon |
author_sort | Marginson, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81640612021-06-01 ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science Marginson, Simon High Educ (Dordr) Article Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8164061/ /pubmed/34092803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Marginson, Simon ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title | ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title_full | ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title_fullStr | ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title_short | ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science |
title_sort | ‘all things are in flux’: china in global science |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marginsonsimon allthingsareinfluxchinainglobalscience |