Cargando…

‘All things are in flux’: China in global science

Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marginson, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9
_version_ 1783701034897506304
author Marginson, Simon
author_facet Marginson, Simon
author_sort Marginson, Simon
collection PubMed
description Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81640612021-06-01 ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science Marginson, Simon High Educ (Dordr) Article Since 1990, a large and dynamic global science system has evolved, based on grass roots collaboration, and resting on the resources, infrastructure and personnel housed by national science systems. Euro-American science systems have become intensively networked in a global duopoly; and many other countries have built national science systems, including a group of large- and middle-sized countries that follow semi-autonomous trajectories based on state investment, intensive national network building, and international engagement, without integrating tightly into the global duopoly. The dual global/national approach pursued by these systems, including China, South Korea, Iran and India, is not always fully understood in papers on science. Nevertheless, China is now the number two science country in the world, the largest producer of papers and number one in parts of STEM physical sciences. The paper investigates the remarkable evolution of China’s science funding, output, discipline balance, internationalisation strategy and national and global networking. China has combined global activity and the local/national building of science in positive sum manner, on the ground of the nationally nested science system. The paper also discusses limits of the achievement, noting that while China-US relations have been instrumental in building science, a partial decoupling is occurring and the future is unclear. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8164061/ /pubmed/34092803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Marginson, Simon
‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title_full ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title_fullStr ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title_full_unstemmed ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title_short ‘All things are in flux’: China in global science
title_sort ‘all things are in flux’: china in global science
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34092803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00712-9
work_keys_str_mv AT marginsonsimon allthingsareinfluxchinainglobalscience