Cargando…
Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for successful weight gain prevention interventions targeting young adults. Developing effective interventions necessitates a theoretical model that can identify barriers and enablers for healthy eating and physical activity among young adults to support weight...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w |
_version_ | 1783701084192112640 |
---|---|
author | Willmott, Taylor Jade Pang, Bo Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn |
author_facet | Willmott, Taylor Jade Pang, Bo Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn |
author_sort | Willmott, Taylor Jade |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for successful weight gain prevention interventions targeting young adults. Developing effective interventions necessitates a theoretical model that can identify barriers and enablers for healthy eating and physical activity among young adults to support weight management. This study empirically examines the utility of the COM-B model as a framework for intervention planning across two behavioural contexts: eating and physical activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey research design was employed to empirically test the COM-B model in the contexts of young adult’s eating and physical activity behaviours. Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, pre-validated measures appropriate for capturing the latency of the COM (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation) constructs were sourced. Both surveys (eating and physical activity) were administered online to two independent samples of young adults aged 18–35 years. Models were specified and tested using structural equation modelling. RESULTS: A total of 582 (mean age = 22.8 years; 80.3% female) and 455 (mean age = 24.9 years; 80.8% female) participants were included in the physical activity and eating analyses, respectively. The COM-B model explained 31% of variance in physical activity behaviour and 23% of variance in eating behaviour. In the physical activity model (N = 582), capability and opportunity were found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. In the eating model (N = 455), capability was found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. Capability was also found to mediate the association between opportunity and motivation. Consistencies and variations were observed across both models in terms of COM indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the COM-B model’s explanatory potential in the context of young adult’s physical activity and eating behaviours. Barriers and enablers underlying young adult’s physical activity and eating behaviours were identified that represent potential targets for future intervention design. Further research is needed to validate present study findings across different populations and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81642882021-06-01 Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model Willmott, Taylor Jade Pang, Bo Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for successful weight gain prevention interventions targeting young adults. Developing effective interventions necessitates a theoretical model that can identify barriers and enablers for healthy eating and physical activity among young adults to support weight management. This study empirically examines the utility of the COM-B model as a framework for intervention planning across two behavioural contexts: eating and physical activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey research design was employed to empirically test the COM-B model in the contexts of young adult’s eating and physical activity behaviours. Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, pre-validated measures appropriate for capturing the latency of the COM (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation) constructs were sourced. Both surveys (eating and physical activity) were administered online to two independent samples of young adults aged 18–35 years. Models were specified and tested using structural equation modelling. RESULTS: A total of 582 (mean age = 22.8 years; 80.3% female) and 455 (mean age = 24.9 years; 80.8% female) participants were included in the physical activity and eating analyses, respectively. The COM-B model explained 31% of variance in physical activity behaviour and 23% of variance in eating behaviour. In the physical activity model (N = 582), capability and opportunity were found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. In the eating model (N = 455), capability was found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. Capability was also found to mediate the association between opportunity and motivation. Consistencies and variations were observed across both models in terms of COM indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the COM-B model’s explanatory potential in the context of young adult’s physical activity and eating behaviours. Barriers and enablers underlying young adult’s physical activity and eating behaviours were identified that represent potential targets for future intervention design. Further research is needed to validate present study findings across different populations and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164288/ /pubmed/34051788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Willmott, Taylor Jade Pang, Bo Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title | Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title_full | Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title_fullStr | Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title_full_unstemmed | Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title_short | Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model |
title_sort | capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the com-b model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willmotttaylorjade capabilityopportunityandmotivationanacrosscontextsempiricalexaminationofthecombmodel AT pangbo capabilityopportunityandmotivationanacrosscontextsempiricalexaminationofthecombmodel AT rundlethielesharyn capabilityopportunityandmotivationanacrosscontextsempiricalexaminationofthecombmodel |