Cargando…

Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center

BACKGROUND: No data exist for the long-term outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the Southern part of Asia. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the survival outcome of mCRC from an Indian tertiary care center. The study also aims to highlight the treatment pattern practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Vinod, Sharma, Atul, Raina, Vinod, Dabkara, Deepak, Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan, Shukla, N. K., Pathy, Sushmita, Thulkar, Sanjay, Deo, S. V. S., Kumar, Sunil, Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08398-z
_version_ 1783701085160996864
author Sharma, Vinod
Sharma, Atul
Raina, Vinod
Dabkara, Deepak
Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan
Shukla, N. K.
Pathy, Sushmita
Thulkar, Sanjay
Deo, S. V. S.
Kumar, Sunil
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
author_facet Sharma, Vinod
Sharma, Atul
Raina, Vinod
Dabkara, Deepak
Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan
Shukla, N. K.
Pathy, Sushmita
Thulkar, Sanjay
Deo, S. V. S.
Kumar, Sunil
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
author_sort Sharma, Vinod
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No data exist for the long-term outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the Southern part of Asia. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the survival outcome of mCRC from an Indian tertiary care center. The study also aims to highlight the treatment pattern practiced and the unique clinico-pathologic characteristics. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study done at a large referral tertiary care center in North India. All patients with synchronous or metachronous mCRC who received at least one dose of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, registered between 2003 to 2017 were included. Primary outcome measures were overall survival and progression-free survival and prognostic factors of overall survival. Descriptive analysis was done for the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment patterns. Kaplan Meier method for overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox regression analysis was performed for the determination of the prognostic factors for overall survival. RESULT: Out of 377 eligible patients, 256 patients (68%) had de novo metastatic disease and the remaining 121 (32%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The cohort was young (median age, 46 years) with the most common primary site being the rectum. A higher proportion of signet (9%) and mucinous histology (24%). The three common sites of metastasis were the liver, peritoneum, and lung. In the first line, most patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (70%). Only 12.5% of patients received biologicals in the first-line setting. The median follow-up and median overall survival of study cohort were 17 months and 18.5 months. The factors associated with poor outcome for overall survival on multivariate analysis were ECOG performance status of > 1, high CEA, low albumin, and the number of lines of chemotherapy received (< 2). CONCLUSION: The outcome of mCRC is inferior to the published literature. We found a relatively higher proportion of patients with the following characteristics; younger, rectum as primary tumor location, the signet, and mucinous histology, higher incidence of peritoneum involvement. The routine use of targeted therapies is limited. Government schemes (inclusion of targeted therapies in the Ayushman scheme), NGO assistance, and availability of generic low-cost targeted drugs may increase the availability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81642922021-06-01 Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center Sharma, Vinod Sharma, Atul Raina, Vinod Dabkara, Deepak Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan Shukla, N. K. Pathy, Sushmita Thulkar, Sanjay Deo, S. V. S. Kumar, Sunil Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: No data exist for the long-term outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the Southern part of Asia. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the survival outcome of mCRC from an Indian tertiary care center. The study also aims to highlight the treatment pattern practiced and the unique clinico-pathologic characteristics. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study done at a large referral tertiary care center in North India. All patients with synchronous or metachronous mCRC who received at least one dose of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, registered between 2003 to 2017 were included. Primary outcome measures were overall survival and progression-free survival and prognostic factors of overall survival. Descriptive analysis was done for the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment patterns. Kaplan Meier method for overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox regression analysis was performed for the determination of the prognostic factors for overall survival. RESULT: Out of 377 eligible patients, 256 patients (68%) had de novo metastatic disease and the remaining 121 (32%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The cohort was young (median age, 46 years) with the most common primary site being the rectum. A higher proportion of signet (9%) and mucinous histology (24%). The three common sites of metastasis were the liver, peritoneum, and lung. In the first line, most patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (70%). Only 12.5% of patients received biologicals in the first-line setting. The median follow-up and median overall survival of study cohort were 17 months and 18.5 months. The factors associated with poor outcome for overall survival on multivariate analysis were ECOG performance status of > 1, high CEA, low albumin, and the number of lines of chemotherapy received (< 2). CONCLUSION: The outcome of mCRC is inferior to the published literature. We found a relatively higher proportion of patients with the following characteristics; younger, rectum as primary tumor location, the signet, and mucinous histology, higher incidence of peritoneum involvement. The routine use of targeted therapies is limited. Government schemes (inclusion of targeted therapies in the Ayushman scheme), NGO assistance, and availability of generic low-cost targeted drugs may increase the availability. BioMed Central 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8164292/ /pubmed/34049505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08398-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sharma, Vinod
Sharma, Atul
Raina, Vinod
Dabkara, Deepak
Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan
Shukla, N. K.
Pathy, Sushmita
Thulkar, Sanjay
Deo, S. V. S.
Kumar, Sunil
Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title_full Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title_fullStr Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title_short Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center
title_sort metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an indian tertiary care center
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08398-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmavinod metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT sharmaatul metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT rainavinod metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT dabkaradeepak metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT mohantibidhukalyan metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT shuklank metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT pathysushmita metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT thulkarsanjay metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT deosvs metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT kumarsunil metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter
AT sahooranjitkumar metastaticcolorectalcancerreallifeexperiencefromanindiantertiarycarecenter