Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Quantification Using Droplet Digital RT-PCR

Quantitative viral load assays have transformed our understanding of viral diseases. They hold similar potential to advance COVID-19 control and prevention, but SARS-CoV-2 viral load tests are not yet widely available. SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic tests, which typically employ real-time RT-PCR, y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinloch, Natalie N., Ritchie, Gordon, Dong, Winnie, Cobarrubias, Kyle D., Sudderuddin, Hanwei, Lawson, Tanya, Matic, Nancy, Montaner, Julio S.G., Leung, Victor, Romney, Marc G., Lowe, Christopher F., Brumme, Chanson J., Brumme, Zabrina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.014
Descripción
Sumario:Quantitative viral load assays have transformed our understanding of viral diseases. They hold similar potential to advance COVID-19 control and prevention, but SARS-CoV-2 viral load tests are not yet widely available. SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic tests, which typically employ real-time RT-PCR, yield semiquantitative results only. Droplet digital RT-PCR (RT-ddPCR) offers an attractive platform for SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. Eight primer/probe sets originally developed for real-time RT-PCR–based SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests were evaluated for use in RT-ddPCR; three were identified as the most efficient, precise, and sensitive for RT-ddPCR–based SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. For example, the analytical efficiency for the E-Sarbeco primer/probe set was approximately 83%, whereas assay precision, measured as the coefficient of variation, was approximately 2% at 1000 input copies/reaction. Lower limits of quantification and detection for this primer/probe set were 18.6 and 4.4 input SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/reaction, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral loads in a convenience panel of 48 COVID-19–positive diagnostic specimens spanned a 6.2log(10) range, confirming substantial viral load variation in vivo. RT-ddPCR–derived SARS-CoV-2 E gene copy numbers were further calibrated against cycle threshold values from a commercial real-time RT-PCR diagnostic platform. This log-linear relationship can be used to mathematically derive SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy numbers from cycle threshold values, allowing the wealth of available diagnostic test data to be harnessed to address foundational questions in SARS-CoV-2 biology.