Cargando…

Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection

AIM: Many inflammation‐nutrition scores, including the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), have been reported as prognostic biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to examine the predictive ability of the GPS and to improve the GPS. METHODS: We included a total of 438 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishikawa, Satoshi, Miyoshi, Norikatsu, Fujino, Shiki, Ogino, Takayuki, Takahashi, Hidekazu, Uemura, Mamoru, Yamamoto, Hirofumi, Mizushima, Tsunekazu, Doki, Yuichiro, Eguchi, Hidetoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12426
_version_ 1783701120581894144
author Ishikawa, Satoshi
Miyoshi, Norikatsu
Fujino, Shiki
Ogino, Takayuki
Takahashi, Hidekazu
Uemura, Mamoru
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Doki, Yuichiro
Eguchi, Hidetoshi
author_facet Ishikawa, Satoshi
Miyoshi, Norikatsu
Fujino, Shiki
Ogino, Takayuki
Takahashi, Hidekazu
Uemura, Mamoru
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Doki, Yuichiro
Eguchi, Hidetoshi
author_sort Ishikawa, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description AIM: Many inflammation‐nutrition scores, including the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), have been reported as prognostic biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to examine the predictive ability of the GPS and to improve the GPS. METHODS: We included a total of 438 patients with stage 0‐III CRC who underwent curative surgery from 2010 to 2013. They were divided into a training set comprising 221 patients and a validation set comprising 227 patients, according to the date of surgery. In the training set, the GPS was verified using a Cox regression model, and cut‐off values for C‐reactive protein (CRP) and albumin for relapse‐free survival (RFS) were calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The improved GPS (iGPS) was developed with additional optimal cut‐off values. We also compared the iGPS with the conventional GPS in the validation set. RESULTS: The high GPS (GPS: 1‐2) was correlated with RFS and overall survival (OS) in the training set. Cut‐off values of CRP and albumin for RFS were 1.6 and 3.9, and we modified the GPS accordingly, adding the cut‐off values of 2 and 3.9 to CRP and albumin, respectively. In the validation set, a high iGPS was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.273; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.212‐4.364; P = .011), although the conventional GPS was not. CONCLUSION: The iGPS was a more accurate prognostic predictor for patients with stage 0‐III CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81644592021-06-04 Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection Ishikawa, Satoshi Miyoshi, Norikatsu Fujino, Shiki Ogino, Takayuki Takahashi, Hidekazu Uemura, Mamoru Yamamoto, Hirofumi Mizushima, Tsunekazu Doki, Yuichiro Eguchi, Hidetoshi Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: Many inflammation‐nutrition scores, including the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), have been reported as prognostic biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to examine the predictive ability of the GPS and to improve the GPS. METHODS: We included a total of 438 patients with stage 0‐III CRC who underwent curative surgery from 2010 to 2013. They were divided into a training set comprising 221 patients and a validation set comprising 227 patients, according to the date of surgery. In the training set, the GPS was verified using a Cox regression model, and cut‐off values for C‐reactive protein (CRP) and albumin for relapse‐free survival (RFS) were calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The improved GPS (iGPS) was developed with additional optimal cut‐off values. We also compared the iGPS with the conventional GPS in the validation set. RESULTS: The high GPS (GPS: 1‐2) was correlated with RFS and overall survival (OS) in the training set. Cut‐off values of CRP and albumin for RFS were 1.6 and 3.9, and we modified the GPS accordingly, adding the cut‐off values of 2 and 3.9 to CRP and albumin, respectively. In the validation set, a high iGPS was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.273; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.212‐4.364; P = .011), although the conventional GPS was not. CONCLUSION: The iGPS was a more accurate prognostic predictor for patients with stage 0‐III CRC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8164459/ /pubmed/34095725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12426 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ishikawa, Satoshi
Miyoshi, Norikatsu
Fujino, Shiki
Ogino, Takayuki
Takahashi, Hidekazu
Uemura, Mamoru
Yamamoto, Hirofumi
Mizushima, Tsunekazu
Doki, Yuichiro
Eguchi, Hidetoshi
Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title_full Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title_fullStr Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title_short Validation of the conventional Glasgow Prognostic Score and development of the improved Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with stage 0‐III colorectal cancer after curative resection
title_sort validation of the conventional glasgow prognostic score and development of the improved glasgow prognostic score in patients with stage 0‐iii colorectal cancer after curative resection
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12426
work_keys_str_mv AT ishikawasatoshi validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT miyoshinorikatsu validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT fujinoshiki validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT oginotakayuki validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT takahashihidekazu validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT uemuramamoru validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT yamamotohirofumi validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT mizushimatsunekazu validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT dokiyuichiro validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection
AT eguchihidetoshi validationoftheconventionalglasgowprognosticscoreanddevelopmentoftheimprovedglasgowprognosticscoreinpatientswithstage0iiicolorectalcanceraftercurativeresection