Cargando…
Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastre...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430 |
_version_ | 1783701121568604160 |
---|---|
author | Kosuga, Toshiyuki Tsujiura, Masahiro Nakashima, Susumu Masuyama, Mamoru Otsuji, Eigo |
author_facet | Kosuga, Toshiyuki Tsujiura, Masahiro Nakashima, Susumu Masuyama, Mamoru Otsuji, Eigo |
author_sort | Kosuga, Toshiyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper‐third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus‐preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle‐third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81644632021-06-04 Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer Kosuga, Toshiyuki Tsujiura, Masahiro Nakashima, Susumu Masuyama, Mamoru Otsuji, Eigo Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper‐third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus‐preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle‐third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8164463/ /pubmed/34095717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kosuga, Toshiyuki Tsujiura, Masahiro Nakashima, Susumu Masuyama, Mamoru Otsuji, Eigo Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title | Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_full | Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_short | Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
title_sort | current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosugatoshiyuki currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer AT tsujiuramasahiro currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer AT nakashimasusumu currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer AT masuyamamamoru currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer AT otsujieigo currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer |