Cargando…

Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosuga, Toshiyuki, Tsujiura, Masahiro, Nakashima, Susumu, Masuyama, Mamoru, Otsuji, Eigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430
_version_ 1783701121568604160
author Kosuga, Toshiyuki
Tsujiura, Masahiro
Nakashima, Susumu
Masuyama, Mamoru
Otsuji, Eigo
author_facet Kosuga, Toshiyuki
Tsujiura, Masahiro
Nakashima, Susumu
Masuyama, Mamoru
Otsuji, Eigo
author_sort Kosuga, Toshiyuki
collection PubMed
description Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper‐third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus‐preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle‐third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81644632021-06-04 Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer Kosuga, Toshiyuki Tsujiura, Masahiro Nakashima, Susumu Masuyama, Mamoru Otsuji, Eigo Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is “function‐preserving gastrectomy (FPG).” FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long‐term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper‐third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus‐preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle‐third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8164463/ /pubmed/34095717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kosuga, Toshiyuki
Tsujiura, Masahiro
Nakashima, Susumu
Masuyama, Mamoru
Otsuji, Eigo
Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_fullStr Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_short Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_sort current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430
work_keys_str_mv AT kosugatoshiyuki currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT tsujiuramasahiro currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT nakashimasusumu currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT masuyamamamoru currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT otsujieigo currentstatusoffunctionpreservinggastrectomyforgastriccancer