Cargando…

Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel

The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foschi, Claudio, Zignoli, Anna, Gaibani, Paolo, Vocale, Caterina, Rossini, Giada, Lafratta, Silvia, Liberatore, Andrea, Turello, Gabriele, Lazzarotto, Tiziana, Ambretti, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259
_version_ 1783701130025369600
author Foschi, Claudio
Zignoli, Anna
Gaibani, Paolo
Vocale, Caterina
Rossini, Giada
Lafratta, Silvia
Liberatore, Andrea
Turello, Gabriele
Lazzarotto, Tiziana
Ambretti, Simone
author_facet Foschi, Claudio
Zignoli, Anna
Gaibani, Paolo
Vocale, Caterina
Rossini, Giada
Lafratta, Silvia
Liberatore, Andrea
Turello, Gabriele
Lazzarotto, Tiziana
Ambretti, Simone
author_sort Foschi, Claudio
collection PubMed
description The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, by comparing the conventional culture approach to an innovative molecular diagnostic technology. A total of 230 lower respiratory tract samples (i.e., bronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavages) were taken from 178 critically ill COVID-19 patients. Each sample was processed by a semi-quantitative culture and by a multiplex PCR panel (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus panel), allowing rapid detection of a wide range of clinically relevant pathogens and a limited number of antimicrobial resistance markers. More than 30% of samples showed a positive bacterial culture, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus the most detected pathogens. FilmArray showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 98.3%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.7%. The molecular test significantly reduced the turn-around-time (TAT) and increased the rates of microbial detection. Most cases missed by culture were characterized by low bacterial loads (10(4)–10(5) copies/mL). FilmArray missed a list of pathogens not included in the molecular panel, especially Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8 cases). FilmArray can be useful to detect bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens of COVID-19 patients, with a significant decrease of TAT. The test is particularly useful to rule out bacterial co-infections and avoid the inappropriate prescription of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81645002021-06-01 Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel Foschi, Claudio Zignoli, Anna Gaibani, Paolo Vocale, Caterina Rossini, Giada Lafratta, Silvia Liberatore, Andrea Turello, Gabriele Lazzarotto, Tiziana Ambretti, Simone J Microbiol Methods Article The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, by comparing the conventional culture approach to an innovative molecular diagnostic technology. A total of 230 lower respiratory tract samples (i.e., bronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavages) were taken from 178 critically ill COVID-19 patients. Each sample was processed by a semi-quantitative culture and by a multiplex PCR panel (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus panel), allowing rapid detection of a wide range of clinically relevant pathogens and a limited number of antimicrobial resistance markers. More than 30% of samples showed a positive bacterial culture, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus the most detected pathogens. FilmArray showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 98.3%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.7%. The molecular test significantly reduced the turn-around-time (TAT) and increased the rates of microbial detection. Most cases missed by culture were characterized by low bacterial loads (10(4)–10(5) copies/mL). FilmArray missed a list of pathogens not included in the molecular panel, especially Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8 cases). FilmArray can be useful to detect bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens of COVID-19 patients, with a significant decrease of TAT. The test is particularly useful to rule out bacterial co-infections and avoid the inappropriate prescription of antibiotics. Elsevier B.V. 2021-07 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164500/ /pubmed/34062210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Foschi, Claudio
Zignoli, Anna
Gaibani, Paolo
Vocale, Caterina
Rossini, Giada
Lafratta, Silvia
Liberatore, Andrea
Turello, Gabriele
Lazzarotto, Tiziana
Ambretti, Simone
Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title_full Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title_fullStr Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title_short Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
title_sort respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized covid-19 patients: conventional culture vs biofire filmarray pneumonia plus panel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259
work_keys_str_mv AT foschiclaudio respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT zignolianna respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT gaibanipaolo respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT vocalecaterina respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT rossinigiada respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT lafrattasilvia respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT liberatoreandrea respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT turellogabriele respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT lazzarottotiziana respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel
AT ambrettisimone respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel