Cargando…
Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel
The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitali...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259 |
_version_ | 1783701130025369600 |
---|---|
author | Foschi, Claudio Zignoli, Anna Gaibani, Paolo Vocale, Caterina Rossini, Giada Lafratta, Silvia Liberatore, Andrea Turello, Gabriele Lazzarotto, Tiziana Ambretti, Simone |
author_facet | Foschi, Claudio Zignoli, Anna Gaibani, Paolo Vocale, Caterina Rossini, Giada Lafratta, Silvia Liberatore, Andrea Turello, Gabriele Lazzarotto, Tiziana Ambretti, Simone |
author_sort | Foschi, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, by comparing the conventional culture approach to an innovative molecular diagnostic technology. A total of 230 lower respiratory tract samples (i.e., bronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavages) were taken from 178 critically ill COVID-19 patients. Each sample was processed by a semi-quantitative culture and by a multiplex PCR panel (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus panel), allowing rapid detection of a wide range of clinically relevant pathogens and a limited number of antimicrobial resistance markers. More than 30% of samples showed a positive bacterial culture, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus the most detected pathogens. FilmArray showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 98.3%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.7%. The molecular test significantly reduced the turn-around-time (TAT) and increased the rates of microbial detection. Most cases missed by culture were characterized by low bacterial loads (10(4)–10(5) copies/mL). FilmArray missed a list of pathogens not included in the molecular panel, especially Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8 cases). FilmArray can be useful to detect bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens of COVID-19 patients, with a significant decrease of TAT. The test is particularly useful to rule out bacterial co-infections and avoid the inappropriate prescription of antibiotics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81645002021-06-01 Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel Foschi, Claudio Zignoli, Anna Gaibani, Paolo Vocale, Caterina Rossini, Giada Lafratta, Silvia Liberatore, Andrea Turello, Gabriele Lazzarotto, Tiziana Ambretti, Simone J Microbiol Methods Article The prevalence and microbiology of concomitant respiratory bacterial infections in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not yet fully understood. In this retrospective study, we assessed respiratory bacterial co-infections in lower respiratory tract samples taken from intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, by comparing the conventional culture approach to an innovative molecular diagnostic technology. A total of 230 lower respiratory tract samples (i.e., bronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavages) were taken from 178 critically ill COVID-19 patients. Each sample was processed by a semi-quantitative culture and by a multiplex PCR panel (FilmArray Pneumonia Plus panel), allowing rapid detection of a wide range of clinically relevant pathogens and a limited number of antimicrobial resistance markers. More than 30% of samples showed a positive bacterial culture, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus the most detected pathogens. FilmArray showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 98.3%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.7%. The molecular test significantly reduced the turn-around-time (TAT) and increased the rates of microbial detection. Most cases missed by culture were characterized by low bacterial loads (10(4)–10(5) copies/mL). FilmArray missed a list of pathogens not included in the molecular panel, especially Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8 cases). FilmArray can be useful to detect bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens of COVID-19 patients, with a significant decrease of TAT. The test is particularly useful to rule out bacterial co-infections and avoid the inappropriate prescription of antibiotics. Elsevier B.V. 2021-07 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164500/ /pubmed/34062210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Foschi, Claudio Zignoli, Anna Gaibani, Paolo Vocale, Caterina Rossini, Giada Lafratta, Silvia Liberatore, Andrea Turello, Gabriele Lazzarotto, Tiziana Ambretti, Simone Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title | Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title_full | Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title_fullStr | Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title_short | Respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Conventional culture vs BioFire FilmArray pneumonia Plus panel |
title_sort | respiratory bacterial co-infections in intensive care unit-hospitalized covid-19 patients: conventional culture vs biofire filmarray pneumonia plus panel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34062210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foschiclaudio respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT zignolianna respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT gaibanipaolo respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT vocalecaterina respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT rossinigiada respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT lafrattasilvia respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT liberatoreandrea respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT turellogabriele respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT lazzarottotiziana respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel AT ambrettisimone respiratorybacterialcoinfectionsinintensivecareunithospitalizedcovid19patientsconventionalculturevsbiofirefilmarraypneumoniapluspanel |