Cargando…
Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0 |
_version_ | 1783701181876404224 |
---|---|
author | Detman, Anna Bucha, Michał Treu, Laura Chojnacka, Aleksandra Pleśniak, Łukasz Salamon, Agnieszka Łupikasza, Ewa Gromadka, Robert Gawor, Jan Gromadka, Agnieszka Drzewicki, Wojciech Jakubiak, Marta Janiga, Marek Matyasik, Irena Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K. Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion Campanaro, Stefano Sikora, Anna |
author_facet | Detman, Anna Bucha, Michał Treu, Laura Chojnacka, Aleksandra Pleśniak, Łukasz Salamon, Agnieszka Łupikasza, Ewa Gromadka, Robert Gawor, Jan Gromadka, Agnieszka Drzewicki, Wojciech Jakubiak, Marta Janiga, Marek Matyasik, Irena Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K. Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion Campanaro, Stefano Sikora, Anna |
author_sort | Detman, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic bacteria and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, allowing the whole process to become thermodynamically favorable. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the dominant acidic products on the metabolic pathways of methane formation and to find a core microbiome and substrate-specific species in a mixed biogas-producing system. RESULTS: Four methane-producing microbial communities were fed with artificial media having one dominant component, respectively, lactate, butyrate, propionate and acetate, for 896 days in 3.5-L Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors. All the microbial communities showed moderately different methane production and utilization of the substrates. Analyses of stable carbon isotope composition of the fermentation gas and the substrates showed differences in average values of δ(13)C(CH(4)) and δ(13)C(CO(2)) revealing that acetate and lactate strongly favored the acetotrophic pathway, while butyrate and propionate favored the hydrogenotrophic pathway of methane formation. Genome-centric metagenomic analysis recovered 234 Metagenome Assembled Genomes (MAGs), including 31 archaeal and 203 bacterial species, mostly unknown and uncultivable. MAGs accounted for 54%–67% of the entire microbial community (depending on the bioreactor) and evidenced that the microbiome is extremely complex in terms of the number of species. The core microbiome was composed of Methanothrix soehngenii (the most abundant), Methanoculleus sp., unknown Bacteroidales and Spirochaetaceae. Relative abundance analysis of all the samples revealed microbes having substrate preferences. Substrate-specific species were mostly unknown and not predominant in the microbial communities. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental system, the dominant fermentation products subjected to methanogenesis moderately modified the final effect of bioreactor performance. At the molecular level, a different contribution of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic pathways for methane production, a very high level of new species recovered, and a moderate variability in microbial composition depending on substrate availability were evidenced. Propionate was not a factor ceasing methane production. All these findings are relevant because lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate are the universal products of acidogenesis, regardless of feedstock. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81647492021-06-01 Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches Detman, Anna Bucha, Michał Treu, Laura Chojnacka, Aleksandra Pleśniak, Łukasz Salamon, Agnieszka Łupikasza, Ewa Gromadka, Robert Gawor, Jan Gromadka, Agnieszka Drzewicki, Wojciech Jakubiak, Marta Janiga, Marek Matyasik, Irena Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K. Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion Campanaro, Stefano Sikora, Anna Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic bacteria and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, allowing the whole process to become thermodynamically favorable. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the dominant acidic products on the metabolic pathways of methane formation and to find a core microbiome and substrate-specific species in a mixed biogas-producing system. RESULTS: Four methane-producing microbial communities were fed with artificial media having one dominant component, respectively, lactate, butyrate, propionate and acetate, for 896 days in 3.5-L Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors. All the microbial communities showed moderately different methane production and utilization of the substrates. Analyses of stable carbon isotope composition of the fermentation gas and the substrates showed differences in average values of δ(13)C(CH(4)) and δ(13)C(CO(2)) revealing that acetate and lactate strongly favored the acetotrophic pathway, while butyrate and propionate favored the hydrogenotrophic pathway of methane formation. Genome-centric metagenomic analysis recovered 234 Metagenome Assembled Genomes (MAGs), including 31 archaeal and 203 bacterial species, mostly unknown and uncultivable. MAGs accounted for 54%–67% of the entire microbial community (depending on the bioreactor) and evidenced that the microbiome is extremely complex in terms of the number of species. The core microbiome was composed of Methanothrix soehngenii (the most abundant), Methanoculleus sp., unknown Bacteroidales and Spirochaetaceae. Relative abundance analysis of all the samples revealed microbes having substrate preferences. Substrate-specific species were mostly unknown and not predominant in the microbial communities. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental system, the dominant fermentation products subjected to methanogenesis moderately modified the final effect of bioreactor performance. At the molecular level, a different contribution of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic pathways for methane production, a very high level of new species recovered, and a moderate variability in microbial composition depending on substrate availability were evidenced. Propionate was not a factor ceasing methane production. All these findings are relevant because lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate are the universal products of acidogenesis, regardless of feedstock. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0. BioMed Central 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164749/ /pubmed/34051845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Detman, Anna Bucha, Michał Treu, Laura Chojnacka, Aleksandra Pleśniak, Łukasz Salamon, Agnieszka Łupikasza, Ewa Gromadka, Robert Gawor, Jan Gromadka, Agnieszka Drzewicki, Wojciech Jakubiak, Marta Janiga, Marek Matyasik, Irena Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K. Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion Campanaro, Stefano Sikora, Anna Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title | Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title_full | Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title_short | Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
title_sort | evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detmananna evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT buchamichał evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT treulaura evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT chojnackaaleksandra evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT plesniakłukasz evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT salamonagnieszka evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT łupikaszaewa evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT gromadkarobert evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT gaworjan evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT gromadkaagnieszka evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT drzewickiwojciech evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT jakubiakmarta evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT janigamarek evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT matyasikirena evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT błaszczykmieczysławk evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT jedrysekmariuszorion evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT campanarostefano evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches AT sikoraanna evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches |