Cargando…

Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches

BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Detman, Anna, Bucha, Michał, Treu, Laura, Chojnacka, Aleksandra, Pleśniak, Łukasz, Salamon, Agnieszka, Łupikasza, Ewa, Gromadka, Robert, Gawor, Jan, Gromadka, Agnieszka, Drzewicki, Wojciech, Jakubiak, Marta, Janiga, Marek, Matyasik, Irena, Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K., Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion, Campanaro, Stefano, Sikora, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0
_version_ 1783701181876404224
author Detman, Anna
Bucha, Michał
Treu, Laura
Chojnacka, Aleksandra
Pleśniak, Łukasz
Salamon, Agnieszka
Łupikasza, Ewa
Gromadka, Robert
Gawor, Jan
Gromadka, Agnieszka
Drzewicki, Wojciech
Jakubiak, Marta
Janiga, Marek
Matyasik, Irena
Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K.
Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion
Campanaro, Stefano
Sikora, Anna
author_facet Detman, Anna
Bucha, Michał
Treu, Laura
Chojnacka, Aleksandra
Pleśniak, Łukasz
Salamon, Agnieszka
Łupikasza, Ewa
Gromadka, Robert
Gawor, Jan
Gromadka, Agnieszka
Drzewicki, Wojciech
Jakubiak, Marta
Janiga, Marek
Matyasik, Irena
Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K.
Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion
Campanaro, Stefano
Sikora, Anna
author_sort Detman, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic bacteria and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, allowing the whole process to become thermodynamically favorable. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the dominant acidic products on the metabolic pathways of methane formation and to find a core microbiome and substrate-specific species in a mixed biogas-producing system. RESULTS: Four methane-producing microbial communities were fed with artificial media having one dominant component, respectively, lactate, butyrate, propionate and acetate, for 896 days in 3.5-L Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors. All the microbial communities showed moderately different methane production and utilization of the substrates. Analyses of stable carbon isotope composition of the fermentation gas and the substrates showed differences in average values of δ(13)C(CH(4)) and δ(13)C(CO(2)) revealing that acetate and lactate strongly favored the acetotrophic pathway, while butyrate and propionate favored the hydrogenotrophic pathway of methane formation. Genome-centric metagenomic analysis recovered 234 Metagenome Assembled Genomes (MAGs), including 31 archaeal and 203 bacterial species, mostly unknown and uncultivable. MAGs accounted for 54%–67% of the entire microbial community (depending on the bioreactor) and evidenced that the microbiome is extremely complex in terms of the number of species. The core microbiome was composed of Methanothrix soehngenii (the most abundant), Methanoculleus sp., unknown Bacteroidales and Spirochaetaceae. Relative abundance analysis of all the samples revealed microbes having substrate preferences. Substrate-specific species were mostly unknown and not predominant in the microbial communities. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental system, the dominant fermentation products subjected to methanogenesis moderately modified the final effect of bioreactor performance. At the molecular level, a different contribution of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic pathways for methane production, a very high level of new species recovered, and a moderate variability in microbial composition depending on substrate availability were evidenced. Propionate was not a factor ceasing methane production. All these findings are relevant because lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate are the universal products of acidogenesis, regardless of feedstock. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81647492021-06-01 Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches Detman, Anna Bucha, Michał Treu, Laura Chojnacka, Aleksandra Pleśniak, Łukasz Salamon, Agnieszka Łupikasza, Ewa Gromadka, Robert Gawor, Jan Gromadka, Agnieszka Drzewicki, Wojciech Jakubiak, Marta Janiga, Marek Matyasik, Irena Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K. Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion Campanaro, Stefano Sikora, Anna Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: During the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic bacteria and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, allowing the whole process to become thermodynamically favorable. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the dominant acidic products on the metabolic pathways of methane formation and to find a core microbiome and substrate-specific species in a mixed biogas-producing system. RESULTS: Four methane-producing microbial communities were fed with artificial media having one dominant component, respectively, lactate, butyrate, propionate and acetate, for 896 days in 3.5-L Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors. All the microbial communities showed moderately different methane production and utilization of the substrates. Analyses of stable carbon isotope composition of the fermentation gas and the substrates showed differences in average values of δ(13)C(CH(4)) and δ(13)C(CO(2)) revealing that acetate and lactate strongly favored the acetotrophic pathway, while butyrate and propionate favored the hydrogenotrophic pathway of methane formation. Genome-centric metagenomic analysis recovered 234 Metagenome Assembled Genomes (MAGs), including 31 archaeal and 203 bacterial species, mostly unknown and uncultivable. MAGs accounted for 54%–67% of the entire microbial community (depending on the bioreactor) and evidenced that the microbiome is extremely complex in terms of the number of species. The core microbiome was composed of Methanothrix soehngenii (the most abundant), Methanoculleus sp., unknown Bacteroidales and Spirochaetaceae. Relative abundance analysis of all the samples revealed microbes having substrate preferences. Substrate-specific species were mostly unknown and not predominant in the microbial communities. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental system, the dominant fermentation products subjected to methanogenesis moderately modified the final effect of bioreactor performance. At the molecular level, a different contribution of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic pathways for methane production, a very high level of new species recovered, and a moderate variability in microbial composition depending on substrate availability were evidenced. Propionate was not a factor ceasing methane production. All these findings are relevant because lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate are the universal products of acidogenesis, regardless of feedstock. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0. BioMed Central 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164749/ /pubmed/34051845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Detman, Anna
Bucha, Michał
Treu, Laura
Chojnacka, Aleksandra
Pleśniak, Łukasz
Salamon, Agnieszka
Łupikasza, Ewa
Gromadka, Robert
Gawor, Jan
Gromadka, Agnieszka
Drzewicki, Wojciech
Jakubiak, Marta
Janiga, Marek
Matyasik, Irena
Błaszczyk, Mieczysław K.
Jędrysek, Mariusz Orion
Campanaro, Stefano
Sikora, Anna
Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title_full Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title_fullStr Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title_short Evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
title_sort evaluation of acidogenesis products’ effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01968-0
work_keys_str_mv AT detmananna evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT buchamichał evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT treulaura evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT chojnackaaleksandra evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT plesniakłukasz evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT salamonagnieszka evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT łupikaszaewa evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT gromadkarobert evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT gaworjan evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT gromadkaagnieszka evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT drzewickiwojciech evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT jakubiakmarta evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT janigamarek evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT matyasikirena evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT błaszczykmieczysławk evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT jedrysekmariuszorion evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT campanarostefano evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches
AT sikoraanna evaluationofacidogenesisproductseffectonbiogasproductionperformedwithmetagenomicsandisotopicapproaches