Cargando…

Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients

BACKGROUND: Colectomy remains a treatment option for a minority of patients with slow-transit constipation (STC) refractory to conservative treatment. However careful patient selection is essential to maximize benefits and minimize risk of adverse outcome. This study determined the proportion of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaichanavichkij, P, Vollebregt, P F, Tee, S Z Y, Scott, S M, Knowles, C H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34052848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab049
_version_ 1783701188361846784
author Chaichanavichkij, P
Vollebregt, P F
Tee, S Z Y
Scott, S M
Knowles, C H
author_facet Chaichanavichkij, P
Vollebregt, P F
Tee, S Z Y
Scott, S M
Knowles, C H
author_sort Chaichanavichkij, P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colectomy remains a treatment option for a minority of patients with slow-transit constipation (STC) refractory to conservative treatment. However careful patient selection is essential to maximize benefits and minimize risk of adverse outcome. This study determined the proportion of patients with chronic constipation that would meet criteria for colectomy based on recent European graded practice recommendations derived by expert consensus. METHODS: Retrospective application of graded practice recommendations was undertaken on a prospectively maintained data set of consecutive adult patients with chronic constipation who underwent whole-gut transit studies using radio-opaque markers. Primary analysis applied contraindications achieving high level of expert consensus (normal whole-gut transit as an absolute contraindication and faecal incontinence as a relative contraindication for colectomy). Secondary analysis applied contraindications with less certain consensus. RESULTS: Primary analysis of 1568 patients undergoing a whole-gut transit study between January 2004 and March 2016 found 208 (13.3 per cent) met published criteria to be selected for colectomy, with 974 excluded for normal whole-gut transit and 386 for faecal incontinence. Secondary analysis demonstrated high prevalence of other relative contraindications to colectomy: 165 concomitant upper gastrointestinal symptoms, 216 abdominal pain (including 126 irritable bowel syndrome), and 446 evacuation disorder. The majority of patients (416 of 594) had two or more relative contraindications. If these patients were excluded, only 26 (1.7 per cent) chronically constipated patients retrospectively met selection criteria for colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective application of selection criteria is a limitation. However, the data highlight the high prevalence of factors associated with poor postoperative outcome and provide further caution to surgeons undertaking colectomy for STC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81647782021-06-02 Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients Chaichanavichkij, P Vollebregt, P F Tee, S Z Y Scott, S M Knowles, C H BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Colectomy remains a treatment option for a minority of patients with slow-transit constipation (STC) refractory to conservative treatment. However careful patient selection is essential to maximize benefits and minimize risk of adverse outcome. This study determined the proportion of patients with chronic constipation that would meet criteria for colectomy based on recent European graded practice recommendations derived by expert consensus. METHODS: Retrospective application of graded practice recommendations was undertaken on a prospectively maintained data set of consecutive adult patients with chronic constipation who underwent whole-gut transit studies using radio-opaque markers. Primary analysis applied contraindications achieving high level of expert consensus (normal whole-gut transit as an absolute contraindication and faecal incontinence as a relative contraindication for colectomy). Secondary analysis applied contraindications with less certain consensus. RESULTS: Primary analysis of 1568 patients undergoing a whole-gut transit study between January 2004 and March 2016 found 208 (13.3 per cent) met published criteria to be selected for colectomy, with 974 excluded for normal whole-gut transit and 386 for faecal incontinence. Secondary analysis demonstrated high prevalence of other relative contraindications to colectomy: 165 concomitant upper gastrointestinal symptoms, 216 abdominal pain (including 126 irritable bowel syndrome), and 446 evacuation disorder. The majority of patients (416 of 594) had two or more relative contraindications. If these patients were excluded, only 26 (1.7 per cent) chronically constipated patients retrospectively met selection criteria for colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective application of selection criteria is a limitation. However, the data highlight the high prevalence of factors associated with poor postoperative outcome and provide further caution to surgeons undertaking colectomy for STC. Oxford University Press 2021-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8164778/ /pubmed/34052848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab049 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaichanavichkij, P
Vollebregt, P F
Tee, S Z Y
Scott, S M
Knowles, C H
Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title_full Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title_fullStr Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title_full_unstemmed Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title_short Slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
title_sort slow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34052848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab049
work_keys_str_mv AT chaichanavichkijp slowtransitconstipationandcriteriaforcolectomyacrosssectionalstudyof1568patients
AT vollebregtpf slowtransitconstipationandcriteriaforcolectomyacrosssectionalstudyof1568patients
AT teeszy slowtransitconstipationandcriteriaforcolectomyacrosssectionalstudyof1568patients
AT scottsm slowtransitconstipationandcriteriaforcolectomyacrosssectionalstudyof1568patients
AT knowlesch slowtransitconstipationandcriteriaforcolectomyacrosssectionalstudyof1568patients