Cargando…
53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to screen out cut-off age value and age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. METHODS: We selec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08376-5 |
_version_ | 1783701192402010112 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Fucai Lu, Zechao He, Chengwu Zhang, Hanbin Wu, Weijia He, Zhaohui |
author_facet | Tang, Fucai Lu, Zechao He, Chengwu Zhang, Hanbin Wu, Weijia He, Zhaohui |
author_sort | Tang, Fucai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to screen out cut-off age value and age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. METHODS: We selected 45,974 CCRCC patients from SEER and 530 RNA-seq data from TCGA database. The age cut-off value was defined using the X-tile program. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between young and old groups. Hazard ratio (HR) was applied to evaluate prognostic risk of age in different subgroups. Age-related DEGs were identified via RNA-seq data. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between DEGs and prognosis. RESULTS: In this study, we divided the patients into young (n = 14,276) and old (n = 31,698) subgroups according to cut-off value (age = 53). Age > 53 years was indicated as independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) of CCRCC before and after PSM. The prognosis of old group was worse than that in young group. Eleven gene were differential expression between the younger and older groups in CCRCC. The expression levels of PLA2G2A and SIX2 were related to prognosis of the elderly. CONCLUSION: Fifty-three years old was cut-off value in CCRCC. The prognosis of the elderly was worse than young people. It remind clinicians that more attention and better treatment should be given to CCRCC patients who are over 53 years old. PLA2G2A and SIX2 were age-related differential genes which might play an important role in the poor prognosis of elderly CCRCC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8164798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81647982021-06-01 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database Tang, Fucai Lu, Zechao He, Chengwu Zhang, Hanbin Wu, Weijia He, Zhaohui BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to screen out cut-off age value and age-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. METHODS: We selected 45,974 CCRCC patients from SEER and 530 RNA-seq data from TCGA database. The age cut-off value was defined using the X-tile program. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between young and old groups. Hazard ratio (HR) was applied to evaluate prognostic risk of age in different subgroups. Age-related DEGs were identified via RNA-seq data. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between DEGs and prognosis. RESULTS: In this study, we divided the patients into young (n = 14,276) and old (n = 31,698) subgroups according to cut-off value (age = 53). Age > 53 years was indicated as independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) of CCRCC before and after PSM. The prognosis of old group was worse than that in young group. Eleven gene were differential expression between the younger and older groups in CCRCC. The expression levels of PLA2G2A and SIX2 were related to prognosis of the elderly. CONCLUSION: Fifty-three years old was cut-off value in CCRCC. The prognosis of the elderly was worse than young people. It remind clinicians that more attention and better treatment should be given to CCRCC patients who are over 53 years old. PLA2G2A and SIX2 were age-related differential genes which might play an important role in the poor prognosis of elderly CCRCC patients. BioMed Central 2021-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8164798/ /pubmed/34051738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08376-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tang, Fucai Lu, Zechao He, Chengwu Zhang, Hanbin Wu, Weijia He, Zhaohui 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title_full | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title_fullStr | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title_full_unstemmed | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title_short | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on TCGA and SEER database |
title_sort | 53 years old is a reasonable cut-off value to define young and old patients in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study based on tcga and seer database |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34051738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08376-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangfucai 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase AT luzechao 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase AT hechengwu 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase AT zhanghanbin 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase AT wuweijia 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase AT hezhaohui 53yearsoldisareasonablecutoffvaluetodefineyoungandoldpatientsinclearcellrenalcellcarcinomaastudybasedontcgaandseerdatabase |