Cargando…

aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is increasingly recognized as a potential therapy for patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to assess outcome differences in disease activity in MS patients treated either with aHSCT or alemtuzumab....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Häußler, Vivien, Ufer, Friederike, Pöttgen, Jana, Wolschke, Christine, Friese, Manuel A., Kröger, Nicolaus, Heesen, Christoph, Stellmann, Jan‐Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33949790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51366
_version_ 1783701203730825216
author Häußler, Vivien
Ufer, Friederike
Pöttgen, Jana
Wolschke, Christine
Friese, Manuel A.
Kröger, Nicolaus
Heesen, Christoph
Stellmann, Jan‐Patrick
author_facet Häußler, Vivien
Ufer, Friederike
Pöttgen, Jana
Wolschke, Christine
Friese, Manuel A.
Kröger, Nicolaus
Heesen, Christoph
Stellmann, Jan‐Patrick
author_sort Häußler, Vivien
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is increasingly recognized as a potential therapy for patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to assess outcome differences in disease activity in MS patients treated either with aHSCT or alemtuzumab. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric registry‐based cohort study by recording the clinical course (EDSS and relapses), MRI parameters (new T2 lesions), and neuropsychological assessment in all 19 MS patients receiving aHSCT, and all 21 patients receiving alemtuzumab between 2007 and 2018. We used survival analyses of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) as the primary objective which was defined by no EDSS progression, no relapse, and no new T2 lesion on MRI. Secondary objectives were EDSS improvement and neurocognitive performance. RESULTS: Both treatment groups were similar in respect of age, gender, disability, and neurocognitive performance except for significantly longer disease duration in the alemtuzumab group. Mean follow‐up was 58.8 [range 29–140] months in the aHSCT group compared to 27.6 [range 11–52] months in the alemtuzumab‐treated group. We observed significantly more patients maintaining NEDA in the aHSCT group (p = 0.048) compared to the alemtuzumab‐treated patients. Furthermore, 37% of the aHSCT patients showed an improvement of EDSS compared to none in the alemtuzumab‐treated group (p = 0.033). It is of note that cognitive function was significantly improved in the aHSCT‐treated patients. INTERPRETATION: aHSCT suppresses inflammatory activity more effectively than alemtuzumab and might enable improvement of overall disability and cognition in MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81648522021-06-15 aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis Häußler, Vivien Ufer, Friederike Pöttgen, Jana Wolschke, Christine Friese, Manuel A. Kröger, Nicolaus Heesen, Christoph Stellmann, Jan‐Patrick Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is increasingly recognized as a potential therapy for patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to assess outcome differences in disease activity in MS patients treated either with aHSCT or alemtuzumab. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric registry‐based cohort study by recording the clinical course (EDSS and relapses), MRI parameters (new T2 lesions), and neuropsychological assessment in all 19 MS patients receiving aHSCT, and all 21 patients receiving alemtuzumab between 2007 and 2018. We used survival analyses of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) as the primary objective which was defined by no EDSS progression, no relapse, and no new T2 lesion on MRI. Secondary objectives were EDSS improvement and neurocognitive performance. RESULTS: Both treatment groups were similar in respect of age, gender, disability, and neurocognitive performance except for significantly longer disease duration in the alemtuzumab group. Mean follow‐up was 58.8 [range 29–140] months in the aHSCT group compared to 27.6 [range 11–52] months in the alemtuzumab‐treated group. We observed significantly more patients maintaining NEDA in the aHSCT group (p = 0.048) compared to the alemtuzumab‐treated patients. Furthermore, 37% of the aHSCT patients showed an improvement of EDSS compared to none in the alemtuzumab‐treated group (p = 0.033). It is of note that cognitive function was significantly improved in the aHSCT‐treated patients. INTERPRETATION: aHSCT suppresses inflammatory activity more effectively than alemtuzumab and might enable improvement of overall disability and cognition in MS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8164852/ /pubmed/33949790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51366 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Häußler, Vivien
Ufer, Friederike
Pöttgen, Jana
Wolschke, Christine
Friese, Manuel A.
Kröger, Nicolaus
Heesen, Christoph
Stellmann, Jan‐Patrick
aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title_full aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title_short aHSCT is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining NEDA and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
title_sort ahsct is superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining neda and improving cognition in multiple sclerosis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33949790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51366
work_keys_str_mv AT haußlervivien ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT uferfriederike ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT pottgenjana ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT wolschkechristine ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT friesemanuela ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT krogernicolaus ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT heesenchristoph ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis
AT stellmannjanpatrick ahsctissuperiortoalemtuzumabinmaintainingnedaandimprovingcognitioninmultiplesclerosis