Cargando…

Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review

To provide an overview of quality indicators (QIs) for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) care and to highlight differences in healthcare settings. A database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar, OpenGrey and Prospective Trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arslan, Ilgin G, Rozendaal, Rianne M, van Middelkoop, Marienke, Stitzinger, Saskia A G, Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul, Voorbrood, Vincent M I, Bindels, Patrick J E, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A, Schiphof, Dieuwke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001590
_version_ 1783701227540840448
author Arslan, Ilgin G
Rozendaal, Rianne M
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Stitzinger, Saskia A G
Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul
Voorbrood, Vincent M I
Bindels, Patrick J E
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
Schiphof, Dieuwke
author_facet Arslan, Ilgin G
Rozendaal, Rianne M
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Stitzinger, Saskia A G
Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul
Voorbrood, Vincent M I
Bindels, Patrick J E
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
Schiphof, Dieuwke
author_sort Arslan, Ilgin G
collection PubMed
description To provide an overview of quality indicators (QIs) for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) care and to highlight differences in healthcare settings. A database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar, OpenGrey and Prospective Trial Register, up to March 2020. Studies developing or adapting existing QI(s) for patients with osteoarthritis were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were categorised into healthcare settings. QIs from included studies were categorised into structure, process and outcome of care. Within these categories, QIs were grouped into themes (eg, physical therapy). A narrative synthesis was used to describe differences and similarities between healthcare settings. We included 20 studies with a total of 196 QIs mostly related to the process of care in different healthcare settings. Few studies included patients’ perspectives. Rigorous methods for evidence synthesis to develop QIs were rarely used. Narrative analysis showed differences in QIs between healthcare settings with regard to exercise therapy, weight counselling, referral to laboratory tests and ‘do not do’ QIs. Differences within the same healthcare setting were identified on radiographic assessment. The heterogeneity in QIs emphasise the necessity to carefully select QIs for KHOA depending on the healthcare setting. This review provides an overview of QIs outlined to their healthcare settings to support healthcare providers and policy makers in selecting the contextually appropriate QIs to validly monitor the quality of KHOA care. We strongly recommend to review QIs against the most recent guidelines before implementing them into practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8164978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81649782021-06-14 Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review Arslan, Ilgin G Rozendaal, Rianne M van Middelkoop, Marienke Stitzinger, Saskia A G Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul Voorbrood, Vincent M I Bindels, Patrick J E Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A Schiphof, Dieuwke RMD Open Osteoarthritis To provide an overview of quality indicators (QIs) for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) care and to highlight differences in healthcare settings. A database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar, OpenGrey and Prospective Trial Register, up to March 2020. Studies developing or adapting existing QI(s) for patients with osteoarthritis were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were categorised into healthcare settings. QIs from included studies were categorised into structure, process and outcome of care. Within these categories, QIs were grouped into themes (eg, physical therapy). A narrative synthesis was used to describe differences and similarities between healthcare settings. We included 20 studies with a total of 196 QIs mostly related to the process of care in different healthcare settings. Few studies included patients’ perspectives. Rigorous methods for evidence synthesis to develop QIs were rarely used. Narrative analysis showed differences in QIs between healthcare settings with regard to exercise therapy, weight counselling, referral to laboratory tests and ‘do not do’ QIs. Differences within the same healthcare setting were identified on radiographic assessment. The heterogeneity in QIs emphasise the necessity to carefully select QIs for KHOA depending on the healthcare setting. This review provides an overview of QIs outlined to their healthcare settings to support healthcare providers and policy makers in selecting the contextually appropriate QIs to validly monitor the quality of KHOA care. We strongly recommend to review QIs against the most recent guidelines before implementing them into practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8164978/ /pubmed/34039753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001590 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Osteoarthritis
Arslan, Ilgin G
Rozendaal, Rianne M
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Stitzinger, Saskia A G
Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul
Voorbrood, Vincent M I
Bindels, Patrick J E
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
Schiphof, Dieuwke
Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title_full Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title_short Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
title_sort quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
topic Osteoarthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8164978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001590
work_keys_str_mv AT arslanilging qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT rozendaalriannem qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT vanmiddelkoopmarienke qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT stitzingersaskiaag qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT vandekerkhovemaartenpaul qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT voorbroodvincentmi qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT bindelspatrickje qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT biermazeinstrasitama qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview
AT schiphofdieuwke qualityindicatorsforkneeandhiposteoarthritiscareasystematicreview