Cargando…
Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations
BACKGROUND: All-on-4 concept allows an immediate restoration, which is frequently a provisional restoration (PR), and will be replaced by a definitive restoration (DR) a few months later. However, this approach involves much higher treatment efforts and costs, compared to a DR immediately after impl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00330-1 |
_version_ | 1783701231053570048 |
---|---|
author | Korsch, Michael Walther, Winfried Hannig, Matthias Bartols, Andreas |
author_facet | Korsch, Michael Walther, Winfried Hannig, Matthias Bartols, Andreas |
author_sort | Korsch, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: All-on-4 concept allows an immediate restoration, which is frequently a provisional restoration (PR), and will be replaced by a definitive restoration (DR) a few months later. However, this approach involves much higher treatment efforts and costs, compared to a DR immediately after implantation. PRs were mostly incorporated in the introductory phase of the All-on-4 concept in our respective clinics. Today, PRs are only used for referred patients and bimaxillary restorations. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PRs and DRs have comparable success rates. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with 136 All-on-4 restorations supported by 544 implants were included in this retrospective cohort study. The observation period was 1 year. In 42 cases, a PR was placed initially and replaced by a DR 3 months later. In 94 cases, a DR was placed immediately. Biological, technical, and severe (loss of an implant or PR/DR) complications associated with PRs and DRs were compared. The absence of a serious complication was considered a success. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were affected by 33 complications, 19 biological (2 PR and 17 DR) and 14 technical (6 in PR and 8 in DR) in the first 3 months. Eight patients had ten severe complications (1 PR and 9 DR). Severe complications were all implant losses. Implant survival rate was 98.2% (99.4% PR and 97.6 DR), and restoration survival rate was 94.4% (97.6% PR and 92.6% DR). Six out of the ten implant losses occurred in the posterior maxillae of male patients. After 3 months, ten complications occurred in six patients within 1 year. One of these complications was an implant loss in the posterior maxillae of a male patient. CONCLUSION: PRs and DRs showed comparable complication rates during the observation period. Only in male patients did implant losses occur more frequently in the posterior maxilla. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-021-00330-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8165050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81650502021-06-17 Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations Korsch, Michael Walther, Winfried Hannig, Matthias Bartols, Andreas Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: All-on-4 concept allows an immediate restoration, which is frequently a provisional restoration (PR), and will be replaced by a definitive restoration (DR) a few months later. However, this approach involves much higher treatment efforts and costs, compared to a DR immediately after implantation. PRs were mostly incorporated in the introductory phase of the All-on-4 concept in our respective clinics. Today, PRs are only used for referred patients and bimaxillary restorations. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PRs and DRs have comparable success rates. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with 136 All-on-4 restorations supported by 544 implants were included in this retrospective cohort study. The observation period was 1 year. In 42 cases, a PR was placed initially and replaced by a DR 3 months later. In 94 cases, a DR was placed immediately. Biological, technical, and severe (loss of an implant or PR/DR) complications associated with PRs and DRs were compared. The absence of a serious complication was considered a success. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were affected by 33 complications, 19 biological (2 PR and 17 DR) and 14 technical (6 in PR and 8 in DR) in the first 3 months. Eight patients had ten severe complications (1 PR and 9 DR). Severe complications were all implant losses. Implant survival rate was 98.2% (99.4% PR and 97.6 DR), and restoration survival rate was 94.4% (97.6% PR and 92.6% DR). Six out of the ten implant losses occurred in the posterior maxillae of male patients. After 3 months, ten complications occurred in six patients within 1 year. One of these complications was an implant loss in the posterior maxillae of a male patient. CONCLUSION: PRs and DRs showed comparable complication rates during the observation period. Only in male patients did implant losses occur more frequently in the posterior maxilla. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40729-021-00330-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8165050/ /pubmed/34056669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00330-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Korsch, Michael Walther, Winfried Hannig, Matthias Bartols, Andreas Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title | Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title_full | Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title_short | Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of All-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
title_sort | evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of all-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00330-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korschmichael evaluationofthesurgicalandprostheticsuccessofallon4restorationsaretrospectivecohortstudyofprovisionalvsdefinitiveimmediaterestorations AT waltherwinfried evaluationofthesurgicalandprostheticsuccessofallon4restorationsaretrospectivecohortstudyofprovisionalvsdefinitiveimmediaterestorations AT hannigmatthias evaluationofthesurgicalandprostheticsuccessofallon4restorationsaretrospectivecohortstudyofprovisionalvsdefinitiveimmediaterestorations AT bartolsandreas evaluationofthesurgicalandprostheticsuccessofallon4restorationsaretrospectivecohortstudyofprovisionalvsdefinitiveimmediaterestorations |