Cargando…

Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis

PURPOSE: In clinical practice, laryngo(strobo)scopy (LS) is still mainly used for diagnostics and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UFVP), although only laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) can provide information on causes of vocal fold immobility, especially on possible synkinetic reinne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanisz, Isabella, Leonhard, Matthias, Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria, Schneider-Stickler, Berit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06714-8
_version_ 1783701234674302976
author Stanisz, Isabella
Leonhard, Matthias
Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria
Schneider-Stickler, Berit
author_facet Stanisz, Isabella
Leonhard, Matthias
Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria
Schneider-Stickler, Berit
author_sort Stanisz, Isabella
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In clinical practice, laryngo(strobo)scopy (LS) is still mainly used for diagnostics and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UFVP), although only laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) can provide information on causes of vocal fold immobility, especially on possible synkinetic reinnervation after recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury. The goal of this retrospective study was the evaluation whether signs of synkinetic reinnervation in LS can be objectified in comparison to LEMG data. METHODS: Between 1/2015 and 2/2018, 50 patients with laryngostroboscopically suspected UVFP received routine LEMG examination. The LEMG findings were retrospectively compared with LS findings. The LEMG data analysis focused on the diagnosis of synkinetic reinnervation of the TA/LCA and/or PCA. The digital LS recordings were retrospectively re-evaluated by phoniatricians considering 22 selected laryngostroboscopic parameters. RESULTS: LEMG revealed synkinesis in 23 (46%) and absence of synkinesis in 27 (54%) patients. None of the 22 parameters showed significant association between patients with synkinetic reinnervation and LS findings. The only laryngostroboscopic parameter that was significantly associated with a silent LEMG signal compared to single fiber activity in LEMG was a length difference on the side of the UVFP (p-value 0.0001; OR 14.5 (95% CI 3.047–66.81; Sensitivity 0.5; Specificity 0.9355). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that synkinesis cannot be diagnosed using only LS. This study underlines the importance of LEMG in clinical routine for detection of laryngeal synkinesis in patients with UVFP before any further therapeutic steps are initiated to avoid later therapy failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81650672021-06-17 Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis Stanisz, Isabella Leonhard, Matthias Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria Schneider-Stickler, Berit Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology PURPOSE: In clinical practice, laryngo(strobo)scopy (LS) is still mainly used for diagnostics and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UFVP), although only laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) can provide information on causes of vocal fold immobility, especially on possible synkinetic reinnervation after recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury. The goal of this retrospective study was the evaluation whether signs of synkinetic reinnervation in LS can be objectified in comparison to LEMG data. METHODS: Between 1/2015 and 2/2018, 50 patients with laryngostroboscopically suspected UVFP received routine LEMG examination. The LEMG findings were retrospectively compared with LS findings. The LEMG data analysis focused on the diagnosis of synkinetic reinnervation of the TA/LCA and/or PCA. The digital LS recordings were retrospectively re-evaluated by phoniatricians considering 22 selected laryngostroboscopic parameters. RESULTS: LEMG revealed synkinesis in 23 (46%) and absence of synkinesis in 27 (54%) patients. None of the 22 parameters showed significant association between patients with synkinetic reinnervation and LS findings. The only laryngostroboscopic parameter that was significantly associated with a silent LEMG signal compared to single fiber activity in LEMG was a length difference on the side of the UVFP (p-value 0.0001; OR 14.5 (95% CI 3.047–66.81; Sensitivity 0.5; Specificity 0.9355). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that synkinesis cannot be diagnosed using only LS. This study underlines the importance of LEMG in clinical routine for detection of laryngeal synkinesis in patients with UVFP before any further therapeutic steps are initiated to avoid later therapy failure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8165067/ /pubmed/33689023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06714-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Laryngology
Stanisz, Isabella
Leonhard, Matthias
Denk-Linnert, Doris-Maria
Schneider-Stickler, Berit
Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title_full Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title_short Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
title_sort diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06714-8
work_keys_str_mv AT staniszisabella diagnosticlimitationoflaryngostroboscopyincomparisontolaryngealelectromyographyinsynkinesisinunilateralvocalfoldparalysis
AT leonhardmatthias diagnosticlimitationoflaryngostroboscopyincomparisontolaryngealelectromyographyinsynkinesisinunilateralvocalfoldparalysis
AT denklinnertdorismaria diagnosticlimitationoflaryngostroboscopyincomparisontolaryngealelectromyographyinsynkinesisinunilateralvocalfoldparalysis
AT schneidersticklerberit diagnosticlimitationoflaryngostroboscopyincomparisontolaryngealelectromyographyinsynkinesisinunilateralvocalfoldparalysis