Cargando…

Epidemiology of Vitiligo – A Dual Population-Based Approach

BACKGROUND: Most epidemiological data on vitiligo refer to selected environments or focus on the prevalence of comorbidity unrelated to the population. OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to gain robust representative prevalence data on vitiligo and on associated dermatologic comorbidity in the German a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Nicole, Petersen, Jana, Kirsten, Natalia, Augustin, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079380
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S304155
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Most epidemiological data on vitiligo refer to selected environments or focus on the prevalence of comorbidity unrelated to the population. OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to gain robust representative prevalence data on vitiligo and on associated dermatologic comorbidity in the German adult population. METHODS: A dual population-based approach was applied with 1) primary data obtained between 2004 and 2014 from dermatological exams in the general working population; 2) claims data from a large German statutory health insurance, reference year 2010. RESULTS: In the working cohort (N = 121,783; 57% male; mean age 43 years), the prevalence of vitiligo was 0.77% (0.84% in men; 0.67% in women). In the claims data (N = 1,619,678; 38% male; mean age 46 years), prevalence was 0.17% (0.14% in men; 0.18% in women). In the working cohort, vitiligo was significantly more common in people with fair skin type, ephelides and port-wine stains and less common in people with acne and solar lentigines. In the claims data, vitiligo was associated with a variety of skin conditions, eg, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and alopecia areata. CONCLUSION: The resulting discrepancy of claims vs primary data between 0.17% and 0.77% indicates the most probable spectrum of vitiligo prevalence in Germany. It is more frequently observed in clinical exams than recorded in claims data, indicating a marked proportion of people seeking no medical help. Such nonattendance may result from the fact that many treatment options do not provide satisfying benefits to the patients.