Cargando…

Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy

PURPOSE: This Lyme disease early detection economic model, for patients with suspected Lyme disease without erythema migrans (EM), compares outcomes of standard two-tier testing (sTTT), modified two-tier testing (mTTT) and the DiaSorin Lyme Detection Algorithm (LDA), a combination of both serology t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradelli, Lorenzo, Pinciroli, Matteo, Houshmand, Hirad, Grassi, Beatrice, Bonelli, Fabrizio, Calleri, Mariella, Ruscio, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S306391
_version_ 1783701242066763776
author Pradelli, Lorenzo
Pinciroli, Matteo
Houshmand, Hirad
Grassi, Beatrice
Bonelli, Fabrizio
Calleri, Mariella
Ruscio, Maurizio
author_facet Pradelli, Lorenzo
Pinciroli, Matteo
Houshmand, Hirad
Grassi, Beatrice
Bonelli, Fabrizio
Calleri, Mariella
Ruscio, Maurizio
author_sort Pradelli, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This Lyme disease early detection economic model, for patients with suspected Lyme disease without erythema migrans (EM), compares outcomes of standard two-tier testing (sTTT), modified two-tier testing (mTTT) and the DiaSorin Lyme Detection Algorithm (LDA), a combination of both serology tests and Interferon-ɤ Release Assay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A patient-level simulation model was built to incorporate effectiveness estimation from a structured focused literature review, and health-care cost inputs for the United States, Germany, and Italy. Simulated clinical outcomes were 1) percent of patients with timely and correct diagnosis, 2) patients appropriately treated and exposed to antibiotics therapy, and 3) patients with late Lyme disease manifestations. Expected health outcomes were expressed in terms of differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) due to disseminated Lyme disease and persisting symptoms, and economic outcomes were analyzed from a third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: The DiaSorin LDA resulted in a better sensitivity compared to sTTT and mTTT, 84% vs 49% and 45%, respectively, in the base case (13% of infected patients in the tested population). Due to the improved diagnostic performance, the LDA-based strategy is expected to be more effective, providing mean incremental 0.024 QALYs per tested patient, or 0.19 per infected patient. Furthermore, from a third-party payer perspective, the adoption of the LDA-based strategy would reduce the expected health-care cost for suspected and confirmed Lyme disease by roughly 40%, ie about $410, €130, and €170 per tested patient in the United States, Germany, and Italy, respectively, compared to sTTT. The results are most sensitive to the infection rate in the tested population, with LDA maintaining a cost advantage for Lyme disease active infection rates ≥0.8-2.5%. CONCLUSION: LDA early diagnostic testing and subsequent treatment of subjects with early Lyme disease without EM are expected to outperform traditional management strategies both clinically and economically in the US, Germany, and Italy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81650992021-06-01 Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy Pradelli, Lorenzo Pinciroli, Matteo Houshmand, Hirad Grassi, Beatrice Bonelli, Fabrizio Calleri, Mariella Ruscio, Maurizio Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: This Lyme disease early detection economic model, for patients with suspected Lyme disease without erythema migrans (EM), compares outcomes of standard two-tier testing (sTTT), modified two-tier testing (mTTT) and the DiaSorin Lyme Detection Algorithm (LDA), a combination of both serology tests and Interferon-ɤ Release Assay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A patient-level simulation model was built to incorporate effectiveness estimation from a structured focused literature review, and health-care cost inputs for the United States, Germany, and Italy. Simulated clinical outcomes were 1) percent of patients with timely and correct diagnosis, 2) patients appropriately treated and exposed to antibiotics therapy, and 3) patients with late Lyme disease manifestations. Expected health outcomes were expressed in terms of differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) due to disseminated Lyme disease and persisting symptoms, and economic outcomes were analyzed from a third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: The DiaSorin LDA resulted in a better sensitivity compared to sTTT and mTTT, 84% vs 49% and 45%, respectively, in the base case (13% of infected patients in the tested population). Due to the improved diagnostic performance, the LDA-based strategy is expected to be more effective, providing mean incremental 0.024 QALYs per tested patient, or 0.19 per infected patient. Furthermore, from a third-party payer perspective, the adoption of the LDA-based strategy would reduce the expected health-care cost for suspected and confirmed Lyme disease by roughly 40%, ie about $410, €130, and €170 per tested patient in the United States, Germany, and Italy, respectively, compared to sTTT. The results are most sensitive to the infection rate in the tested population, with LDA maintaining a cost advantage for Lyme disease active infection rates ≥0.8-2.5%. CONCLUSION: LDA early diagnostic testing and subsequent treatment of subjects with early Lyme disease without EM are expected to outperform traditional management strategies both clinically and economically in the US, Germany, and Italy. Dove 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8165099/ /pubmed/34079307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S306391 Text en © 2021 Pradelli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Pinciroli, Matteo
Houshmand, Hirad
Grassi, Beatrice
Bonelli, Fabrizio
Calleri, Mariella
Ruscio, Maurizio
Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title_full Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title_fullStr Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title_short Comparative Cost and Effectiveness of a New Algorithm for Early Lyme Disease Diagnosis: Evaluation in US, Germany, and Italy
title_sort comparative cost and effectiveness of a new algorithm for early lyme disease diagnosis: evaluation in us, germany, and italy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S306391
work_keys_str_mv AT pradellilorenzo comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT pincirolimatteo comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT houshmandhirad comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT grassibeatrice comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT bonellifabrizio comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT callerimariella comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly
AT rusciomaurizio comparativecostandeffectivenessofanewalgorithmforearlylymediseasediagnosisevaluationinusgermanyanditaly