Cargando…

Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about optimal fluid therapy for patients with sepsis without shock who present to the ED. In this study, we aimed to quantify the effect of a fluid challenge on non-invasively measured Cardiac Index (CI) in patients presenting with sepsis without shock. METHODS: In a pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koopmans, Nienke K, Stolmeijer, Renate, Sijtsma, Ben C, van Beest, Paul A, Boerma, Christiaan E, Veeger, Nic J, ter Avest, Ewoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209771
_version_ 1783701252185522176
author Koopmans, Nienke K
Stolmeijer, Renate
Sijtsma, Ben C
van Beest, Paul A
Boerma, Christiaan E
Veeger, Nic J
ter Avest, Ewoud
author_facet Koopmans, Nienke K
Stolmeijer, Renate
Sijtsma, Ben C
van Beest, Paul A
Boerma, Christiaan E
Veeger, Nic J
ter Avest, Ewoud
author_sort Koopmans, Nienke K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about optimal fluid therapy for patients with sepsis without shock who present to the ED. In this study, we aimed to quantify the effect of a fluid challenge on non-invasively measured Cardiac Index (CI) in patients presenting with sepsis without shock. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, CI, stroke volume (SV) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured non-invasively in 30 patients presenting with sepsis without shock to the ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between May 2018 and March 2019 using the ClearSight system. After baseline measurements were performed, a passive leg raise (PLR) was done to simulate a fluid bolus. Measurements were then repeated 30, 60, 90 and 120 s after PLR. Finally, a standardised 500 mL NaCl 0.9% intravenous bolus was administered after which final measurements were done. Fluid responsiveness was defined as >15% increase in CI after a standardised fluid challenge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven out of 30 (23%) patients demonstrated a >15% increase in CI after PLR and after a 500 mL fluid bolus. Fluid responders had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (64 (44–78) vs 37 (23–47), p=0.009) but otherwise similar patient and treatment characteristics as non-responders. Baseline measurements of cardiac output (CO), CI, SV and SVR were unrelated to PLR fluid responsiveness. The change in CI after PLR was strongly positive correlated to the change in CI after a 500 mL NaCl 0.9% fluid bolus (r=0.88, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that in patients with sepsis in the absence of shock, three out of four patients do not demonstrate a clinically relevant increase in CI after a standardised fluid challenge. Non-invasive CO monitoring in combination with a PLR test has the potential to identify patients who might benefit from fluid resuscitation and may contribute to a better tailored treatment of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81651412021-06-14 Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study Koopmans, Nienke K Stolmeijer, Renate Sijtsma, Ben C van Beest, Paul A Boerma, Christiaan E Veeger, Nic J ter Avest, Ewoud Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about optimal fluid therapy for patients with sepsis without shock who present to the ED. In this study, we aimed to quantify the effect of a fluid challenge on non-invasively measured Cardiac Index (CI) in patients presenting with sepsis without shock. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, CI, stroke volume (SV) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured non-invasively in 30 patients presenting with sepsis without shock to the ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between May 2018 and March 2019 using the ClearSight system. After baseline measurements were performed, a passive leg raise (PLR) was done to simulate a fluid bolus. Measurements were then repeated 30, 60, 90 and 120 s after PLR. Finally, a standardised 500 mL NaCl 0.9% intravenous bolus was administered after which final measurements were done. Fluid responsiveness was defined as >15% increase in CI after a standardised fluid challenge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven out of 30 (23%) patients demonstrated a >15% increase in CI after PLR and after a 500 mL fluid bolus. Fluid responders had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (64 (44–78) vs 37 (23–47), p=0.009) but otherwise similar patient and treatment characteristics as non-responders. Baseline measurements of cardiac output (CO), CI, SV and SVR were unrelated to PLR fluid responsiveness. The change in CI after PLR was strongly positive correlated to the change in CI after a 500 mL NaCl 0.9% fluid bolus (r=0.88, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that in patients with sepsis in the absence of shock, three out of four patients do not demonstrate a clinically relevant increase in CI after a standardised fluid challenge. Non-invasive CO monitoring in combination with a PLR test has the potential to identify patients who might benefit from fluid resuscitation and may contribute to a better tailored treatment of these patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8165141/ /pubmed/33888514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209771 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Koopmans, Nienke K
Stolmeijer, Renate
Sijtsma, Ben C
van Beest, Paul A
Boerma, Christiaan E
Veeger, Nic J
ter Avest, Ewoud
Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title_full Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title_short Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
title_sort non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209771
work_keys_str_mv AT koopmansnienkek noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT stolmeijerrenate noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sijtsmabenc noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vanbeestpaula noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT boermachristiaane noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT veegernicj noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT teravestewoud noninvasiveassessmentoffluidresponsivenesstoguidefluidtherapyinpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivecohortstudy