Cargando…
Claims of ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in Cochrane and other systematic reviews
Estimates of treatment effects/differences derived from controlled comparisons are subject to uncertainty, both because of the quality of the data and the play of chance. Despite this, authors sometimes use statistical significance testing to make definitive statements that ‘no difference exists bet...
Autores principales: | Marson Smith, Phoebe Rose, Ware, Lynda, Adams, Clive, Chalmers, Iain |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111257 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer
por: Goldkuhle, Marius, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The Cochrane Collaboration withdraws a review on methylphenidate for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
por: Boesen, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study
por: Turner, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2020)