Cargando…

Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xin, Xue, Tao, Wang, Zilan, Chen, Zhouqing, Zhang, Xuwei, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856
_version_ 1783701310952964096
author Wu, Xin
Xue, Tao
Wang, Zilan
Chen, Zhouqing
Zhang, Xuwei
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Zhong
author_facet Wu, Xin
Xue, Tao
Wang, Zilan
Chen, Zhouqing
Zhang, Xuwei
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Zhong
author_sort Wu, Xin
collection PubMed
description Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dose of 0.5 mg/d is the optimal one still remains to be solved. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the four existing doses of fingolimod in the treatment of RRMS, especially the dose of 0.5 mg/d. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for RCTs which were performed to evaluate different doses of fingolimod and the corresponding control (placebo or DMTs) up to October 2020. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Results: We pooled 7184 patients from 11 RCTs. Fingolimod 0.5 mg/d was superior to control group in all eight efficacy outcomes including annualized relapse rate (ARR) (MD −0.22, 95%CI −0.29 to −0.14, p < 0.00001) but surprisingly showed a higher risk of basal-cell carcinoma (RR 4.40, 95%CI 1.58 to 12.24, p = 0.004). Although 1.25 mg/d is more than twice the dose of 0.5 mg/d, the effect size was almost similar between them. Dose of 5 mg/d obtained an unsatisfactory efficacy while showing a greater risk of adverse events than other three doses (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.30, p = 0.003). Additionally, fingolimod 0.25 mg/d not only showed a better performance in delaying the disease progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but also achieved a certain degree of patient treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: At present, 0.5 mg/d remains to be the optimal dose of fingolimod for RRMS patients but trials of a lower dose are still of great clinical significance and should be paid more attentions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81653872021-06-01 Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Wu, Xin Xue, Tao Wang, Zilan Chen, Zhouqing Zhang, Xuwei Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dose of 0.5 mg/d is the optimal one still remains to be solved. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the four existing doses of fingolimod in the treatment of RRMS, especially the dose of 0.5 mg/d. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for RCTs which were performed to evaluate different doses of fingolimod and the corresponding control (placebo or DMTs) up to October 2020. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Results: We pooled 7184 patients from 11 RCTs. Fingolimod 0.5 mg/d was superior to control group in all eight efficacy outcomes including annualized relapse rate (ARR) (MD −0.22, 95%CI −0.29 to −0.14, p < 0.00001) but surprisingly showed a higher risk of basal-cell carcinoma (RR 4.40, 95%CI 1.58 to 12.24, p = 0.004). Although 1.25 mg/d is more than twice the dose of 0.5 mg/d, the effect size was almost similar between them. Dose of 5 mg/d obtained an unsatisfactory efficacy while showing a greater risk of adverse events than other three doses (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.30, p = 0.003). Additionally, fingolimod 0.25 mg/d not only showed a better performance in delaying the disease progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but also achieved a certain degree of patient treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: At present, 0.5 mg/d remains to be the optimal dose of fingolimod for RRMS patients but trials of a lower dose are still of great clinical significance and should be paid more attentions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8165387/ /pubmed/34079453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu, Xue, Wang, Chen, Zhang, Zhang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Wu, Xin
Xue, Tao
Wang, Zilan
Chen, Zhouqing
Zhang, Xuwei
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Zhong
Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort different doses of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxin differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuetao differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangzilan differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenzhouqing differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangxuwei differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangwei differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangzhong differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials