Cargando…
Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856 |
_version_ | 1783701310952964096 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Xin Xue, Tao Wang, Zilan Chen, Zhouqing Zhang, Xuwei Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhong |
author_facet | Wu, Xin Xue, Tao Wang, Zilan Chen, Zhouqing Zhang, Xuwei Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhong |
author_sort | Wu, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dose of 0.5 mg/d is the optimal one still remains to be solved. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the four existing doses of fingolimod in the treatment of RRMS, especially the dose of 0.5 mg/d. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for RCTs which were performed to evaluate different doses of fingolimod and the corresponding control (placebo or DMTs) up to October 2020. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Results: We pooled 7184 patients from 11 RCTs. Fingolimod 0.5 mg/d was superior to control group in all eight efficacy outcomes including annualized relapse rate (ARR) (MD −0.22, 95%CI −0.29 to −0.14, p < 0.00001) but surprisingly showed a higher risk of basal-cell carcinoma (RR 4.40, 95%CI 1.58 to 12.24, p = 0.004). Although 1.25 mg/d is more than twice the dose of 0.5 mg/d, the effect size was almost similar between them. Dose of 5 mg/d obtained an unsatisfactory efficacy while showing a greater risk of adverse events than other three doses (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.30, p = 0.003). Additionally, fingolimod 0.25 mg/d not only showed a better performance in delaying the disease progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but also achieved a certain degree of patient treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: At present, 0.5 mg/d remains to be the optimal dose of fingolimod for RRMS patients but trials of a lower dose are still of great clinical significance and should be paid more attentions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8165387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81653872021-06-01 Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Wu, Xin Xue, Tao Wang, Zilan Chen, Zhouqing Zhang, Xuwei Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The efficacy and safety of fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) had been well verified in several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) during the past decade. However, there are fewer systematic comparisons of different doses of fingolimod and whether the dose of 0.5 mg/d is the optimal one still remains to be solved. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the four existing doses of fingolimod in the treatment of RRMS, especially the dose of 0.5 mg/d. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for RCTs which were performed to evaluate different doses of fingolimod and the corresponding control (placebo or DMTs) up to October 2020. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Results: We pooled 7184 patients from 11 RCTs. Fingolimod 0.5 mg/d was superior to control group in all eight efficacy outcomes including annualized relapse rate (ARR) (MD −0.22, 95%CI −0.29 to −0.14, p < 0.00001) but surprisingly showed a higher risk of basal-cell carcinoma (RR 4.40, 95%CI 1.58 to 12.24, p = 0.004). Although 1.25 mg/d is more than twice the dose of 0.5 mg/d, the effect size was almost similar between them. Dose of 5 mg/d obtained an unsatisfactory efficacy while showing a greater risk of adverse events than other three doses (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.30, p = 0.003). Additionally, fingolimod 0.25 mg/d not only showed a better performance in delaying the disease progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but also achieved a certain degree of patient treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: At present, 0.5 mg/d remains to be the optimal dose of fingolimod for RRMS patients but trials of a lower dose are still of great clinical significance and should be paid more attentions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8165387/ /pubmed/34079453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu, Xue, Wang, Chen, Zhang, Zhang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Wu, Xin Xue, Tao Wang, Zilan Chen, Zhouqing Zhang, Xuwei Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhong Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Different Doses of Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | different doses of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuxin differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xuetao differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangzilan differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenzhouqing differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangxuwei differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangwei differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangzhong differentdosesoffingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |