Cargando…
Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores
Some organizations such as 23andMe and the UK Biobank have large genomic databases that they re-use for multiple different genome-wide association studies. Even research studies that compile smaller genomic databases often utilize these databases to investigate many related traits. It is common for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2020.0445 |
_version_ | 1783701328903536640 |
---|---|
author | Paige, Brooks Bell, James Bellet, Aurélien Gascón, Adrià Ezer, Daphne |
author_facet | Paige, Brooks Bell, James Bellet, Aurélien Gascón, Adrià Ezer, Daphne |
author_sort | Paige, Brooks |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some organizations such as 23andMe and the UK Biobank have large genomic databases that they re-use for multiple different genome-wide association studies. Even research studies that compile smaller genomic databases often utilize these databases to investigate many related traits. It is common for the study to report a genetic risk score (GRS) model for each trait within the publication. Here, we show that under some circumstances, these GRS models can be used to recover the genetic variants of individuals in these genomic databases—a reconstruction attack. In particular, if two GRS models are trained by using a largely overlapping set of participants, it is often possible to determine the genotype for each of the individuals who were used to train one GRS model, but not the other. We demonstrate this theoretically and experimentally by analyzing the Cornell Dog Genome database. The accuracy of our reconstruction attack depends on how accurately we can estimate the rate of co-occurrence of pairs of single nucleotide polymorphisms within the private database, so if this aggregate information is ever released, it would drastically reduce the security of a private genomic database. Caution should be applied when using the same database for multiple analysis, especially when a small number of individuals are included or excluded from one part of the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8165474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81654742021-06-01 Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores Paige, Brooks Bell, James Bellet, Aurélien Gascón, Adrià Ezer, Daphne J Comput Biol Preface Some organizations such as 23andMe and the UK Biobank have large genomic databases that they re-use for multiple different genome-wide association studies. Even research studies that compile smaller genomic databases often utilize these databases to investigate many related traits. It is common for the study to report a genetic risk score (GRS) model for each trait within the publication. Here, we show that under some circumstances, these GRS models can be used to recover the genetic variants of individuals in these genomic databases—a reconstruction attack. In particular, if two GRS models are trained by using a largely overlapping set of participants, it is often possible to determine the genotype for each of the individuals who were used to train one GRS model, but not the other. We demonstrate this theoretically and experimentally by analyzing the Cornell Dog Genome database. The accuracy of our reconstruction attack depends on how accurately we can estimate the rate of co-occurrence of pairs of single nucleotide polymorphisms within the private database, so if this aggregate information is ever released, it would drastically reduce the security of a private genomic database. Caution should be applied when using the same database for multiple analysis, especially when a small number of individuals are included or excluded from one part of the study. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-05-01 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8165474/ /pubmed/33400590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2020.0445 Text en © Brooks Paige, et al., 2021. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Preface Paige, Brooks Bell, James Bellet, Aurélien Gascón, Adrià Ezer, Daphne Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title | Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title_full | Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title_fullStr | Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title_short | Reconstructing Genotypes in Private Genomic Databases from Genetic Risk Scores |
title_sort | reconstructing genotypes in private genomic databases from genetic risk scores |
topic | Preface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33400590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2020.0445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paigebrooks reconstructinggenotypesinprivategenomicdatabasesfromgeneticriskscores AT belljames reconstructinggenotypesinprivategenomicdatabasesfromgeneticriskscores AT belletaurelien reconstructinggenotypesinprivategenomicdatabasesfromgeneticriskscores AT gasconadria reconstructinggenotypesinprivategenomicdatabasesfromgeneticriskscores AT ezerdaphne reconstructinggenotypesinprivategenomicdatabasesfromgeneticriskscores |