Cargando…

NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemothera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haakensen, Vilde Drageset, Nowak, Anna K., Ellingsen, Espen Basmo, Farooqi, Saima Jamil, Bjaanæs, Maria Moksnes, Horndalsveen, Henrik, Mcculloch, Tine, Grundberg, Oscar, Cedres, Susana M., Helland, Åslaug
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3
_version_ 1783701335129980928
author Haakensen, Vilde Drageset
Nowak, Anna K.
Ellingsen, Espen Basmo
Farooqi, Saima Jamil
Bjaanæs, Maria Moksnes
Horndalsveen, Henrik
Mcculloch, Tine
Grundberg, Oscar
Cedres, Susana M.
Helland, Åslaug
author_facet Haakensen, Vilde Drageset
Nowak, Anna K.
Ellingsen, Espen Basmo
Farooqi, Saima Jamil
Bjaanæs, Maria Moksnes
Horndalsveen, Henrik
Mcculloch, Tine
Grundberg, Oscar
Cedres, Susana M.
Helland, Åslaug
author_sort Haakensen, Vilde Drageset
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients. METHODS: NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. DISCUSSION: Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81655042021-06-01 NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma Haakensen, Vilde Drageset Nowak, Anna K. Ellingsen, Espen Basmo Farooqi, Saima Jamil Bjaanæs, Maria Moksnes Horndalsveen, Henrik Mcculloch, Tine Grundberg, Oscar Cedres, Susana M. Helland, Åslaug J Transl Med Protocol BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients. METHODS: NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. DISCUSSION: Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1. BioMed Central 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8165504/ /pubmed/34059094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Haakensen, Vilde Drageset
Nowak, Anna K.
Ellingsen, Espen Basmo
Farooqi, Saima Jamil
Bjaanæs, Maria Moksnes
Horndalsveen, Henrik
Mcculloch, Tine
Grundberg, Oscar
Cedres, Susana M.
Helland, Åslaug
NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_full NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_fullStr NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_full_unstemmed NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_short NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
title_sort nipu: a randomised, open-label, phase ii study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with uv1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02905-3
work_keys_str_mv AT haakensenvildedrageset nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT nowakannak nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT ellingsenespenbasmo nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT farooqisaimajamil nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT bjaanæsmariamoksnes nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT horndalsveenhenrik nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT mccullochtine nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT grundbergoscar nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT cedressusanam nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma
AT hellandaslaug nipuarandomisedopenlabelphaseiistudyevaluatingnivolumabandipilimumabcombinedwithuv1vaccinationassecondlinetreatmentinpatientswithmalignantmesothelioma