Cargando…

Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa

OBJECTIVE: In this study, by comparing coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning in treating tongue cancer, the significance of noncoplanar fields in the protection of the lip and buccal mucosa was determined, and a reasonable solution was selected. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lao, Zheng, Bi, Fan, Fan, Wenhui, Xu, Xuanli, Tu, Wenyong, Shi, Huifeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211019511
_version_ 1783701340338257920
author Lao, Zheng
Bi, Fan
Fan, Wenhui
Xu, Xuanli
Tu, Wenyong
Shi, Huifeng
author_facet Lao, Zheng
Bi, Fan
Fan, Wenhui
Xu, Xuanli
Tu, Wenyong
Shi, Huifeng
author_sort Lao, Zheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In this study, by comparing coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning in treating tongue cancer, the significance of noncoplanar fields in the protection of the lip and buccal mucosa was determined, and a reasonable solution was selected. METHODS: Forty-eight tongue cancer patients treated from June 2019 to February 2021 were selected and randomly divided into a coplanar field group and a noncoplanar field group. The mucosal dose limit changed from 15 Gy to 45 Gy for comparison of the two treatment plans. The evaluation indicators (conformal index (CI); homogeneity index (HI); D5, D50, and D98 of the target volume; and the dose of normal tissues) were calculated under different mucosal dose limits. The clinical observation of the lip and buccal mucosa of 48 cases was monitored and graded carefully according to NCI-CTCAE V4.0. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The differences in CI, HI, D98, D50 and D5 between the two groups in the target volume tended to decrease when the mucosal dose limit was less than 30 Gy, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). When the limit exceeded 30 Gy, significant differences in other indicators except CI (P < 0.05) were still noted. In normal tissue, differences in doses between the two groups existed when the mucosal limit was less than 20 Gy, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). When the limit exceeded 20 Gy, no significant difference was noted. Patients in the noncoplanar group showed significantly better results than those in the other group in terms of the radiation-related toxicity of the lip and cheek membrane(P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with coplanar field radiotherapy, noncoplanar field radiotherapy can effectively reduce the exposure dose to the lip and buccal mucosa. The application of noncoplanar treatment plans exhibits good clinical significance and deserves to be promoted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8165526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81655262021-06-07 Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa Lao, Zheng Bi, Fan Fan, Wenhui Xu, Xuanli Tu, Wenyong Shi, Huifeng Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article OBJECTIVE: In this study, by comparing coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning in treating tongue cancer, the significance of noncoplanar fields in the protection of the lip and buccal mucosa was determined, and a reasonable solution was selected. METHODS: Forty-eight tongue cancer patients treated from June 2019 to February 2021 were selected and randomly divided into a coplanar field group and a noncoplanar field group. The mucosal dose limit changed from 15 Gy to 45 Gy for comparison of the two treatment plans. The evaluation indicators (conformal index (CI); homogeneity index (HI); D5, D50, and D98 of the target volume; and the dose of normal tissues) were calculated under different mucosal dose limits. The clinical observation of the lip and buccal mucosa of 48 cases was monitored and graded carefully according to NCI-CTCAE V4.0. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The differences in CI, HI, D98, D50 and D5 between the two groups in the target volume tended to decrease when the mucosal dose limit was less than 30 Gy, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). When the limit exceeded 30 Gy, significant differences in other indicators except CI (P < 0.05) were still noted. In normal tissue, differences in doses between the two groups existed when the mucosal limit was less than 20 Gy, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). When the limit exceeded 20 Gy, no significant difference was noted. Patients in the noncoplanar group showed significantly better results than those in the other group in terms of the radiation-related toxicity of the lip and cheek membrane(P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with coplanar field radiotherapy, noncoplanar field radiotherapy can effectively reduce the exposure dose to the lip and buccal mucosa. The application of noncoplanar treatment plans exhibits good clinical significance and deserves to be promoted. SAGE Publications 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8165526/ /pubmed/34044671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211019511 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lao, Zheng
Bi, Fan
Fan, Wenhui
Xu, Xuanli
Tu, Wenyong
Shi, Huifeng
Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title_full Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title_fullStr Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title_full_unstemmed Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title_short Noncoplanar Versus Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Protection of the Lip and Buccal Mucosa
title_sort noncoplanar versus coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (imrt) for protection of the lip and buccal mucosa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211019511
work_keys_str_mv AT laozheng noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa
AT bifan noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa
AT fanwenhui noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa
AT xuxuanli noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa
AT tuwenyong noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa
AT shihuifeng noncoplanarversuscoplanarintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtforprotectionofthelipandbuccalmucosa