Cargando…

Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND: Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma is vital for disease control. However, obtaining reliable and clinically useful measures of adherence remains a major challenge. We investigated the association between patient-reported adherence and objectively measured adherence base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Frodi Fridason, Håkansson, Kjell E. J., Overgaard Nielsen, Britt, Weinreich, Ulla Møller, Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00072-2
_version_ 1783701428431224832
author Jensen, Frodi Fridason
Håkansson, Kjell E. J.
Overgaard Nielsen, Britt
Weinreich, Ulla Møller
Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli
author_facet Jensen, Frodi Fridason
Håkansson, Kjell E. J.
Overgaard Nielsen, Britt
Weinreich, Ulla Møller
Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli
author_sort Jensen, Frodi Fridason
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma is vital for disease control. However, obtaining reliable and clinically useful measures of adherence remains a major challenge. We investigated the association between patient-reported adherence and objectively measured adherence based on filled prescriptions with inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma. METHODS: In total, 178 patients with asthma were asked to self-assess adherence during routine visits at a respiratory outpatient clinic. Self-assessment was performed using Foster score (“How many days in a 7-day week do you take your medication as prescribed?”, with the answer divided by 7). Objective adherence was calculated as medication possession ratio (MPR). Bivariate and multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, FEV(1), GINA treatment step, excessive use of SABA, and history of exacerbations were used for analyses. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 87.6% reported a Foster score of 100%, while the mean ICS MPR was 54.0% (SD 25%). Complex regimens such as twice-daily dosing or dual inhaler-use were associated with lower adherence (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). Foster score was predictive of ICS MPR, with an absolute 32% increase in MPR between patients reporting Foster scores of 0 and 100% (95% CI 13–50%, p < 0.001). Female sex predicted higher ICS MPR (p = 0.019). Previous asthma-related hospitalization(s) predicted lower ICS MPR (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Although a weak association was found between Foster score and ICS MPR, findings do not support the use of Foster score, and by that self-reported adherence, as a reliable marker of controller adherence in asthma due to significant mismatch between patient-reported adherence and MPR. Future studies should address the complex interplay between patient-reported and objectively assessed adherence to controller medication in asthma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40733-021-00072-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81660042021-06-02 Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma Jensen, Frodi Fridason Håkansson, Kjell E. J. Overgaard Nielsen, Britt Weinreich, Ulla Møller Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli Asthma Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma is vital for disease control. However, obtaining reliable and clinically useful measures of adherence remains a major challenge. We investigated the association between patient-reported adherence and objectively measured adherence based on filled prescriptions with inhaled corticosteroids in adults with asthma. METHODS: In total, 178 patients with asthma were asked to self-assess adherence during routine visits at a respiratory outpatient clinic. Self-assessment was performed using Foster score (“How many days in a 7-day week do you take your medication as prescribed?”, with the answer divided by 7). Objective adherence was calculated as medication possession ratio (MPR). Bivariate and multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, FEV(1), GINA treatment step, excessive use of SABA, and history of exacerbations were used for analyses. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 87.6% reported a Foster score of 100%, while the mean ICS MPR was 54.0% (SD 25%). Complex regimens such as twice-daily dosing or dual inhaler-use were associated with lower adherence (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). Foster score was predictive of ICS MPR, with an absolute 32% increase in MPR between patients reporting Foster scores of 0 and 100% (95% CI 13–50%, p < 0.001). Female sex predicted higher ICS MPR (p = 0.019). Previous asthma-related hospitalization(s) predicted lower ICS MPR (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Although a weak association was found between Foster score and ICS MPR, findings do not support the use of Foster score, and by that self-reported adherence, as a reliable marker of controller adherence in asthma due to significant mismatch between patient-reported adherence and MPR. Future studies should address the complex interplay between patient-reported and objectively assessed adherence to controller medication in asthma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40733-021-00072-2. BioMed Central 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8166004/ /pubmed/34059120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00072-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jensen, Frodi Fridason
Håkansson, Kjell E. J.
Overgaard Nielsen, Britt
Weinreich, Ulla Møller
Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli
Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title_full Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title_fullStr Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title_short Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
title_sort self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00072-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenfrodifridason selfreportedvsobjectivelyassessedadherencetoinhaledcorticosteroidsinasthma
AT hakanssonkjellej selfreportedvsobjectivelyassessedadherencetoinhaledcorticosteroidsinasthma
AT overgaardnielsenbritt selfreportedvsobjectivelyassessedadherencetoinhaledcorticosteroidsinasthma
AT weinreichullamøller selfreportedvsobjectivelyassessedadherencetoinhaledcorticosteroidsinasthma
AT ulrikcharlottesuppli selfreportedvsobjectivelyassessedadherencetoinhaledcorticosteroidsinasthma