Cargando…

Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes

PURPOSE: Exercise is efficacious for people living after a cancer diagnosis. However, implementation of exercise interventions in real-world settings is challenging. Implementation outcomes are defined as ‘the effects of deliberate and purposive actions to implement new treatments, practices, and se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Czosnek, Louise, Richards, Justin, Zopf, Eva, Cormie, Prue, Rosenbaum, Simon, Rankin, Nicole M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34053445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08196-7
_version_ 1783701439801982976
author Czosnek, Louise
Richards, Justin
Zopf, Eva
Cormie, Prue
Rosenbaum, Simon
Rankin, Nicole M.
author_facet Czosnek, Louise
Richards, Justin
Zopf, Eva
Cormie, Prue
Rosenbaum, Simon
Rankin, Nicole M.
author_sort Czosnek, Louise
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Exercise is efficacious for people living after a cancer diagnosis. However, implementation of exercise interventions in real-world settings is challenging. Implementation outcomes are defined as ‘the effects of deliberate and purposive actions to implement new treatments, practices, and services’. Measuring implementation outcomes is a practical way of evaluating implementation success. This systematic review explores the implementation outcomes of exercise interventions evaluated under real-world conditions for cancer care. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search of Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, SportsDiscus, Scopus and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2020. The Moving through Cancer registry was hand searched. The Implementation Outcomes Framework guided data extraction. Inclusion criteria were adult populations with a cancer diagnosis. Efficacy studies were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles that described 31 unique programs met the inclusion criteria. Implementation outcomes commonly evaluated were feasibility (unique programs n = 17, 54.8%) and adoption (unique programs n = 14, 45.2%). Interventions were typically delivered in the community (unique programs n = 17, 58.6%), in groups (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%) and supervised by a qualified health professional (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%). Implementation outcomes infrequently evaluated were penetration (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%) and sustainability (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise studies need to measure and evaluate implementation outcomes under real-world conditions. Robust measurement and reporting of implementation outcomes can help to identify what strategies are essential for successful implementation of exercise interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding how exercise interventions can be successful implemented is important so that people living after a cancer diagnosis can derive the benefits of exercise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08196-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81660652021-06-02 Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes Czosnek, Louise Richards, Justin Zopf, Eva Cormie, Prue Rosenbaum, Simon Rankin, Nicole M. BMC Cancer Research Article PURPOSE: Exercise is efficacious for people living after a cancer diagnosis. However, implementation of exercise interventions in real-world settings is challenging. Implementation outcomes are defined as ‘the effects of deliberate and purposive actions to implement new treatments, practices, and services’. Measuring implementation outcomes is a practical way of evaluating implementation success. This systematic review explores the implementation outcomes of exercise interventions evaluated under real-world conditions for cancer care. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search of Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, SportsDiscus, Scopus and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2020. The Moving through Cancer registry was hand searched. The Implementation Outcomes Framework guided data extraction. Inclusion criteria were adult populations with a cancer diagnosis. Efficacy studies were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles that described 31 unique programs met the inclusion criteria. Implementation outcomes commonly evaluated were feasibility (unique programs n = 17, 54.8%) and adoption (unique programs n = 14, 45.2%). Interventions were typically delivered in the community (unique programs n = 17, 58.6%), in groups (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%) and supervised by a qualified health professional (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%). Implementation outcomes infrequently evaluated were penetration (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%) and sustainability (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise studies need to measure and evaluate implementation outcomes under real-world conditions. Robust measurement and reporting of implementation outcomes can help to identify what strategies are essential for successful implementation of exercise interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding how exercise interventions can be successful implemented is important so that people living after a cancer diagnosis can derive the benefits of exercise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08196-7. BioMed Central 2021-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8166065/ /pubmed/34053445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08196-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Czosnek, Louise
Richards, Justin
Zopf, Eva
Cormie, Prue
Rosenbaum, Simon
Rankin, Nicole M.
Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title_full Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title_fullStr Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title_short Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
title_sort exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34053445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08196-7
work_keys_str_mv AT czosneklouise exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes
AT richardsjustin exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes
AT zopfeva exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes
AT cormieprue exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes
AT rosenbaumsimon exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes
AT rankinnicolem exerciseinterventionsforpeoplediagnosedwithcancerasystematicreviewofimplementationoutcomes