Cargando…

The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of amalgam contamination, different surface treatments, and adhesive protocols on dentin shear bond strength (SBS) to bulk-fill composite resin material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty teeth were fixed in molds, and the dentin was exposed and then polished. Sixty teeth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshehri, Nojoud, Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079382
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S307545
_version_ 1783701470160355328
author Alshehri, Nojoud
Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
author_facet Alshehri, Nojoud
Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
author_sort Alshehri, Nojoud
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of amalgam contamination, different surface treatments, and adhesive protocols on dentin shear bond strength (SBS) to bulk-fill composite resin material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty teeth were fixed in molds, and the dentin was exposed and then polished. Sixty teeth were restored by amalgam and thermocycled to 10,000 cycles (5°C and 55°C, 30-second dwell time). The rest were restored with composite materials without amalgam predecessor. The samples were divided into G1 (with dentin pretreatment with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate), G2 (0.5 mm of dentin was removed), G3 (no surface modification), and G4 (samples were restored with bulk-fill composite). The bonded specimens were subdivided based on the adhesive protocol of the universal adhesive system used into etch-and-rinse and self-etch groups. Acid etching was done using 32% phosphoric acid. Composite resin was used for build-up using mold and glass. Specimens were cured and left for 24 h in distilled water at room temperature for polymerization reaction, underwent thermocycling for 5000 cycles, and were subjected to knife-edge shear bond testing. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and one-way analysis of variance followed by pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The highest mean SBS values were found in the control group where acid etching was used (24.46±2.24 MPa), followed by self-etching in the same group (21.92±2.54 MPa). Lower SBS values were associated with the amalgam-contaminated group. The lowest values were found in the dentin refreshment group when the self-etching mode was used (13.59±1.73 MPa). Chlorhexidine treatment improved the mean SBS value compared with the no treatment or dentin refreshment groups for both adhesive protocols. CONCLUSION: Amalgam contamination may affect SBS values. Acid etching improved SBS for non-contaminated dentin. Chlorhexidine improved SBS for amalgam-contaminated dentin as a surface treatment but had no significant effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81662602021-06-01 The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols Alshehri, Nojoud Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of amalgam contamination, different surface treatments, and adhesive protocols on dentin shear bond strength (SBS) to bulk-fill composite resin material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty teeth were fixed in molds, and the dentin was exposed and then polished. Sixty teeth were restored by amalgam and thermocycled to 10,000 cycles (5°C and 55°C, 30-second dwell time). The rest were restored with composite materials without amalgam predecessor. The samples were divided into G1 (with dentin pretreatment with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate), G2 (0.5 mm of dentin was removed), G3 (no surface modification), and G4 (samples were restored with bulk-fill composite). The bonded specimens were subdivided based on the adhesive protocol of the universal adhesive system used into etch-and-rinse and self-etch groups. Acid etching was done using 32% phosphoric acid. Composite resin was used for build-up using mold and glass. Specimens were cured and left for 24 h in distilled water at room temperature for polymerization reaction, underwent thermocycling for 5000 cycles, and were subjected to knife-edge shear bond testing. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and one-way analysis of variance followed by pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The highest mean SBS values were found in the control group where acid etching was used (24.46±2.24 MPa), followed by self-etching in the same group (21.92±2.54 MPa). Lower SBS values were associated with the amalgam-contaminated group. The lowest values were found in the dentin refreshment group when the self-etching mode was used (13.59±1.73 MPa). Chlorhexidine treatment improved the mean SBS value compared with the no treatment or dentin refreshment groups for both adhesive protocols. CONCLUSION: Amalgam contamination may affect SBS values. Acid etching improved SBS for non-contaminated dentin. Chlorhexidine improved SBS for amalgam-contaminated dentin as a surface treatment but had no significant effect. Dove 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8166260/ /pubmed/34079382 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S307545 Text en © 2021 Alshehri and Bin-Shuwaish. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alshehri, Nojoud
Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title_full The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title_fullStr The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title_short The Effects of Amalgam Contamination and Different Surface Modifications on Dentin Shear Bond Strength When Using Different Adhesive Protocols
title_sort effects of amalgam contamination and different surface modifications on dentin shear bond strength when using different adhesive protocols
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079382
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S307545
work_keys_str_mv AT alshehrinojoud theeffectsofamalgamcontaminationanddifferentsurfacemodificationsondentinshearbondstrengthwhenusingdifferentadhesiveprotocols
AT binshuwaishmohammed theeffectsofamalgamcontaminationanddifferentsurfacemodificationsondentinshearbondstrengthwhenusingdifferentadhesiveprotocols
AT alshehrinojoud effectsofamalgamcontaminationanddifferentsurfacemodificationsondentinshearbondstrengthwhenusingdifferentadhesiveprotocols
AT binshuwaishmohammed effectsofamalgamcontaminationanddifferentsurfacemodificationsondentinshearbondstrengthwhenusingdifferentadhesiveprotocols