Cargando…

Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations

The most common cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain is chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). MPS often presents with increased muscle stiffness, and the myofascial trigger point (MTrP). Imaging modalities have been used to identify the MTrP, but their role in the detection and diagnosis of MPS r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Valerie, Behr, Michael, Gangwar, Anshika, Noseworthy, Michael D, Kumbhare, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S302683
_version_ 1783701473723416576
author Evans, Valerie
Behr, Michael
Gangwar, Anshika
Noseworthy, Michael D
Kumbhare, Dinesh
author_facet Evans, Valerie
Behr, Michael
Gangwar, Anshika
Noseworthy, Michael D
Kumbhare, Dinesh
author_sort Evans, Valerie
collection PubMed
description The most common cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain is chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). MPS often presents with increased muscle stiffness, and the myofascial trigger point (MTrP). Imaging modalities have been used to identify the MTrP, but their role in the detection and diagnosis of MPS remains unclear. The purpose of this review was to identify evidence in literature for the use of imaging in the role of classifying and explaining the physiology of MTrPs. Since few imaging techniques have been performed on MTrPs, we explored the imaging techniques that can effectively image complex skeletal muscle microstructure, and how they could be used. As part of a scoping review, we conducted a systematic search from three medical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE) from year to year to analyze past MTrP imaging, as well as analyzing imaging techniques performed on the microstructure of muscle. Previously, ultrasound has been used to differentiate active, latent MTrPs, but these studies do not adequately address their underlying anatomical structure. MRI remains the standard method of imaging skeletal muscle. The existing MRI literature suggests that the DTI technique can quantify muscle injury, strain, and structure. However, theoretically, HARDI and DKI techniques seem to provide more information for complex structural areas, although these modalities have a disadvantage of longer scan times and have not been widely used on skeletal muscle. Our review suggests that DTI is the most effective imaging modality that has been used to define the microstructure of muscle and hence, could be optimal to image the MTrP. HARDI and DKI are techniques with theoretical potential for analysis of muscle, which may provide more detailed information representative of finer muscle structural features. Future research utilizing MRI techniques to image muscle are necessary to provide a more robust means of imaging skeletal muscle and the MTrP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81662772021-06-01 Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations Evans, Valerie Behr, Michael Gangwar, Anshika Noseworthy, Michael D Kumbhare, Dinesh J Pain Res Review The most common cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain is chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). MPS often presents with increased muscle stiffness, and the myofascial trigger point (MTrP). Imaging modalities have been used to identify the MTrP, but their role in the detection and diagnosis of MPS remains unclear. The purpose of this review was to identify evidence in literature for the use of imaging in the role of classifying and explaining the physiology of MTrPs. Since few imaging techniques have been performed on MTrPs, we explored the imaging techniques that can effectively image complex skeletal muscle microstructure, and how they could be used. As part of a scoping review, we conducted a systematic search from three medical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE) from year to year to analyze past MTrP imaging, as well as analyzing imaging techniques performed on the microstructure of muscle. Previously, ultrasound has been used to differentiate active, latent MTrPs, but these studies do not adequately address their underlying anatomical structure. MRI remains the standard method of imaging skeletal muscle. The existing MRI literature suggests that the DTI technique can quantify muscle injury, strain, and structure. However, theoretically, HARDI and DKI techniques seem to provide more information for complex structural areas, although these modalities have a disadvantage of longer scan times and have not been widely used on skeletal muscle. Our review suggests that DTI is the most effective imaging modality that has been used to define the microstructure of muscle and hence, could be optimal to image the MTrP. HARDI and DKI are techniques with theoretical potential for analysis of muscle, which may provide more detailed information representative of finer muscle structural features. Future research utilizing MRI techniques to image muscle are necessary to provide a more robust means of imaging skeletal muscle and the MTrP. Dove 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8166277/ /pubmed/34079365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S302683 Text en © 2021 Evans et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Evans, Valerie
Behr, Michael
Gangwar, Anshika
Noseworthy, Michael D
Kumbhare, Dinesh
Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title_full Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title_fullStr Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title_short Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations
title_sort potential role of mri imaging for myofascial pain: a scoping review for the clinicians and theoretical considerations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S302683
work_keys_str_mv AT evansvalerie potentialroleofmriimagingformyofascialpainascopingreviewforthecliniciansandtheoreticalconsiderations
AT behrmichael potentialroleofmriimagingformyofascialpainascopingreviewforthecliniciansandtheoreticalconsiderations
AT gangwaranshika potentialroleofmriimagingformyofascialpainascopingreviewforthecliniciansandtheoreticalconsiderations
AT noseworthymichaeld potentialroleofmriimagingformyofascialpainascopingreviewforthecliniciansandtheoreticalconsiderations
AT kumbharedinesh potentialroleofmriimagingformyofascialpainascopingreviewforthecliniciansandtheoreticalconsiderations