Cargando…

The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Superior hypogastric neurolytic block is performed to block visceral pelvic pain. This could be performed through the anterior approach guided by CT or ultrasound and through a posterior approach, guided by fluoroscopy or CT. METHODS: Sixty adult patients with severe visceral pelvic pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelghafar, Ekramy M, Othman, Ahmed H, Soliman, Mahmoud Salem, Kilany, Ayman, Shaaban, Mohammed H, Shaker, Ehab H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079361
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S308743
_version_ 1783701479229489152
author Abdelghafar, Ekramy M
Othman, Ahmed H
Soliman, Mahmoud Salem
Kilany, Ayman
Shaaban, Mohammed H
Shaker, Ehab H
author_facet Abdelghafar, Ekramy M
Othman, Ahmed H
Soliman, Mahmoud Salem
Kilany, Ayman
Shaaban, Mohammed H
Shaker, Ehab H
author_sort Abdelghafar, Ekramy M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Superior hypogastric neurolytic block is performed to block visceral pelvic pain. This could be performed through the anterior approach guided by CT or ultrasound and through a posterior approach, guided by fluoroscopy or CT. METHODS: Sixty adult patients with severe visceral pelvic pain (VAS>70 mm) were randomly divided into two groups. Group S: SHP block was done ultrasound guided using the anterior approach and confirmed by fluoroscopy. Group F: SHP block was done fluoroscopic guided using the posterior oblique approach. The VAS (visual analog scale), duration of the technique, time of X-ray exposure, patient satisfaction score, patient global impression of change (PGIC), quality of life score, and daily morphine consumption (mg/day) were measured pre-procedure and at the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 12th week after the procedure. In addition, any side effects of the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in VAS between the two groups (P<0.01) (better in group S). The quality of life score was improved from the pre-procedure in both groups (P<0.05), and morphine consumption was significantly lower in group S than in group F (P<0.05) at the 1st, 4th, and 8th week and not significant at the 12th week. The two groups show a statistically significant difference as regards the duration of the procedure and X-ray exposure (P<0.01). There was a statistically significant difference in the satisfactory score between the two groups at the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 12th week (P<0.01). As regards the PGIC score, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In group S, no back pain was reported, while 11 patients of group F complained from post-procedure back pain (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The anterior ultrasound guided SHPB aided by fluoroscopy is suggested to be more superior to the standard fluoroscopic guided technique in relieving pelvic cancer pain and decreasing morphine consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81663122021-06-01 The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study Abdelghafar, Ekramy M Othman, Ahmed H Soliman, Mahmoud Salem Kilany, Ayman Shaaban, Mohammed H Shaker, Ehab H J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Superior hypogastric neurolytic block is performed to block visceral pelvic pain. This could be performed through the anterior approach guided by CT or ultrasound and through a posterior approach, guided by fluoroscopy or CT. METHODS: Sixty adult patients with severe visceral pelvic pain (VAS>70 mm) were randomly divided into two groups. Group S: SHP block was done ultrasound guided using the anterior approach and confirmed by fluoroscopy. Group F: SHP block was done fluoroscopic guided using the posterior oblique approach. The VAS (visual analog scale), duration of the technique, time of X-ray exposure, patient satisfaction score, patient global impression of change (PGIC), quality of life score, and daily morphine consumption (mg/day) were measured pre-procedure and at the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 12th week after the procedure. In addition, any side effects of the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in VAS between the two groups (P<0.01) (better in group S). The quality of life score was improved from the pre-procedure in both groups (P<0.05), and morphine consumption was significantly lower in group S than in group F (P<0.05) at the 1st, 4th, and 8th week and not significant at the 12th week. The two groups show a statistically significant difference as regards the duration of the procedure and X-ray exposure (P<0.01). There was a statistically significant difference in the satisfactory score between the two groups at the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 12th week (P<0.01). As regards the PGIC score, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In group S, no back pain was reported, while 11 patients of group F complained from post-procedure back pain (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The anterior ultrasound guided SHPB aided by fluoroscopy is suggested to be more superior to the standard fluoroscopic guided technique in relieving pelvic cancer pain and decreasing morphine consumption. Dove 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8166312/ /pubmed/34079361 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S308743 Text en © 2021 Abdelghafar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Abdelghafar, Ekramy M
Othman, Ahmed H
Soliman, Mahmoud Salem
Kilany, Ayman
Shaaban, Mohammed H
Shaker, Ehab H
The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title_full The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title_short The Role of Double Modality Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Treating Intractable Pelvic Cancer Pain: A Comparative Study
title_sort role of double modality ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guided superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis in treating intractable pelvic cancer pain: a comparative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079361
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S308743
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelghafarekramym theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT othmanahmedh theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT solimanmahmoudsalem theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT kilanyayman theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT shaabanmohammedh theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT shakerehabh theroleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT abdelghafarekramym roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT othmanahmedh roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT solimanmahmoudsalem roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT kilanyayman roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT shaabanmohammedh roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy
AT shakerehabh roleofdoublemodalityultrasonographicandfluoroscopicguidedsuperiorhypogastricplexusneurolysisintreatingintractablepelviccancerpainacomparativestudy