Cargando…

A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)

PURPOSE: To determine patient preference and treatment outcomes with an intracanalicular dexamethasone (0.4 mg) insert compared to standard steroid drop regimen in the contralateral eye following bilateral RLE surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, interventional, randomized, controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Jacob, Whitt, Travis, Parker, Briana, Swan, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079218
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S311070
_version_ 1783701479690862592
author Larsen, Jacob
Whitt, Travis
Parker, Briana
Swan, Russell
author_facet Larsen, Jacob
Whitt, Travis
Parker, Briana
Swan, Russell
author_sort Larsen, Jacob
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine patient preference and treatment outcomes with an intracanalicular dexamethasone (0.4 mg) insert compared to standard steroid drop regimen in the contralateral eye following bilateral RLE surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, interventional, randomized, controlled study in 20 subjects who underwent bilateral RLE. Each patient served as their own control with one eye randomized to the intracanalicular insert (Group A) placed at the time of surgery and the contralateral randomized to topical corticosteroid drops (Group B). All eyes received intracameral moxifloxacin at the time of surgery, and post-operatively, topical moxifloxacin QID for one week and topical NSAID daily for four weeks. Post-operative evaluations were performed on Day 1, Week 1, and Week 4–8. RESULTS: Twenty patients participated. At 4–8 weeks post-operation, 90% of patients evaluated with the COMTOL questionnaire preferred the intracanalicular insert while 10% preferred the topical steroid. Comparative analysis using the visual analog scale showed no difference in pain between the study and control group. No statistical difference was shown in post-operative corneal staining, anterior chamber cell count, anterior chamber flare or intraocular pressure. Mean LogMAR UCVA at 4–8 weeks post-operation was 0.06 (± 0.230) in the study group and 0.065 (± 0.241) in the control group, which was not statistically or clinically different (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing bilateral RLE expressed a strong preference towards the use of an intracanalicular insert over a topical steroid for post-operative steroid treatment. There was no clinically or statistically significant difference in outcomes, including rate of cystoid macular edema, visual acuity and elevation of intraocular pressure. NATIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: 04549935.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81663142021-06-01 A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE) Larsen, Jacob Whitt, Travis Parker, Briana Swan, Russell Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To determine patient preference and treatment outcomes with an intracanalicular dexamethasone (0.4 mg) insert compared to standard steroid drop regimen in the contralateral eye following bilateral RLE surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, interventional, randomized, controlled study in 20 subjects who underwent bilateral RLE. Each patient served as their own control with one eye randomized to the intracanalicular insert (Group A) placed at the time of surgery and the contralateral randomized to topical corticosteroid drops (Group B). All eyes received intracameral moxifloxacin at the time of surgery, and post-operatively, topical moxifloxacin QID for one week and topical NSAID daily for four weeks. Post-operative evaluations were performed on Day 1, Week 1, and Week 4–8. RESULTS: Twenty patients participated. At 4–8 weeks post-operation, 90% of patients evaluated with the COMTOL questionnaire preferred the intracanalicular insert while 10% preferred the topical steroid. Comparative analysis using the visual analog scale showed no difference in pain between the study and control group. No statistical difference was shown in post-operative corneal staining, anterior chamber cell count, anterior chamber flare or intraocular pressure. Mean LogMAR UCVA at 4–8 weeks post-operation was 0.06 (± 0.230) in the study group and 0.065 (± 0.241) in the control group, which was not statistically or clinically different (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing bilateral RLE expressed a strong preference towards the use of an intracanalicular insert over a topical steroid for post-operative steroid treatment. There was no clinically or statistically significant difference in outcomes, including rate of cystoid macular edema, visual acuity and elevation of intraocular pressure. NATIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: 04549935. Dove 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8166314/ /pubmed/34079218 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S311070 Text en © 2021 Larsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Larsen, Jacob
Whitt, Travis
Parker, Briana
Swan, Russell
A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title_full A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title_fullStr A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title_short A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert (0.4 Mg) for the Treatment of Post-Operative Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE)
title_sort randomized, controlled, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of an intracanalicular dexamethasone ophthalmic insert (0.4 mg) for the treatment of post-operative inflammation in patients undergoing refractive lens exchange (rle)
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34079218
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S311070
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenjacob arandomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT whitttravis arandomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT parkerbriana arandomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT swanrussell arandomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT larsenjacob randomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT whitttravis randomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT parkerbriana randomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle
AT swanrussell randomizedcontrolledprospectivestudyoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofanintracanaliculardexamethasoneophthalmicinsert04mgforthetreatmentofpostoperativeinflammationinpatientsundergoingrefractivelensexchangerle