Cargando…

Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: A progressively growing number of rheumatologists have integrated musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as a prized tool in their daily clinical practice over the past two decades. Lately, YouTube is often used by healthcare professionals as an educational tool. This study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zengin, Orhan, Onder, Mustafa Erkut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05793-6
_version_ 1783701491850149888
author Zengin, Orhan
Onder, Mustafa Erkut
author_facet Zengin, Orhan
Onder, Mustafa Erkut
author_sort Zengin, Orhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: A progressively growing number of rheumatologists have integrated musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as a prized tool in their daily clinical practice over the past two decades. Lately, YouTube is often used by healthcare professionals as an educational tool. This study aimed to analyze the quality of educational information available on YouTube pertaining to MSUS. METHOD: We performed a search using the keyword “musculoskeletal ultrasound” on YouTube in January 2021. Of the first 200 videos screened, 147 met the inclusion criteria. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the global quality score (GQS) and modified DISCERN score, and their popularity was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Of the 147 videos evaluated, 58 (39.5%) were of high quality, 30 (20.4%) were of moderate quality, while 59 (40.1%) were of low quality. The modified DISCERN score and the duration of the videos were significantly higher in the high-quality videos than the moderate- and low-quality videos (p < 0.001 for all). The median number of views per day, likes, comments, and the popularity of the videos assessed with VPI were significantly higher in the high- and moderate-quality group compared to the low-quality videos (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The quality of YouTube videos as an educational source on MSUS is unsatisfactory. Professional organizations and physicians should consider creating more high-quality MSUS videos. YouTube should consider filtering out poor-quality videos in collaboration with experts in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81663702021-06-01 Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound Zengin, Orhan Onder, Mustafa Erkut Clin Rheumatol Original Article INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: A progressively growing number of rheumatologists have integrated musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as a prized tool in their daily clinical practice over the past two decades. Lately, YouTube is often used by healthcare professionals as an educational tool. This study aimed to analyze the quality of educational information available on YouTube pertaining to MSUS. METHOD: We performed a search using the keyword “musculoskeletal ultrasound” on YouTube in January 2021. Of the first 200 videos screened, 147 met the inclusion criteria. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the global quality score (GQS) and modified DISCERN score, and their popularity was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Of the 147 videos evaluated, 58 (39.5%) were of high quality, 30 (20.4%) were of moderate quality, while 59 (40.1%) were of low quality. The modified DISCERN score and the duration of the videos were significantly higher in the high-quality videos than the moderate- and low-quality videos (p < 0.001 for all). The median number of views per day, likes, comments, and the popularity of the videos assessed with VPI were significantly higher in the high- and moderate-quality group compared to the low-quality videos (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The quality of YouTube videos as an educational source on MSUS is unsatisfactory. Professional organizations and physicians should consider creating more high-quality MSUS videos. YouTube should consider filtering out poor-quality videos in collaboration with experts in the field. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8166370/ /pubmed/34059985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05793-6 Text en © International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zengin, Orhan
Onder, Mustafa Erkut
Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title_full Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title_fullStr Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title_short Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
title_sort educational quality of youtube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05793-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zenginorhan educationalqualityofyoutubevideosonmusculoskeletalultrasound
AT ondermustafaerkut educationalqualityofyoutubevideosonmusculoskeletalultrasound