Cargando…

Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide. Here, we evaluated the performance of two quantitative antigen (Ag) tests, the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests, using automated platforms. METHODS: We collected 637 nasopharyngeal swab samples from 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirotsu, Yosuke, Sugiura, Hiroki, Maejima, Makoto, Hayakawa, Miyoko, Mochizuki, Hitoshi, Tsutsui, Toshiharu, Kakizaki, Yumiko, Miyashita, Yoshihiro, Omata, Masao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.067
_version_ 1783701506308964352
author Hirotsu, Yosuke
Sugiura, Hiroki
Maejima, Makoto
Hayakawa, Miyoko
Mochizuki, Hitoshi
Tsutsui, Toshiharu
Kakizaki, Yumiko
Miyashita, Yoshihiro
Omata, Masao
author_facet Hirotsu, Yosuke
Sugiura, Hiroki
Maejima, Makoto
Hayakawa, Miyoko
Mochizuki, Hitoshi
Tsutsui, Toshiharu
Kakizaki, Yumiko
Miyashita, Yoshihiro
Omata, Masao
author_sort Hirotsu, Yosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide. Here, we evaluated the performance of two quantitative antigen (Ag) tests, the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests, using automated platforms. METHODS: We collected 637 nasopharyngeal swab samples from 274 individuals. Samples were subjected to quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), the Roche Ag test and Lumipulse Ag test. RESULTS: When RT-qPCR was used as a reference, the overall concordance rate of the Roche Ag test was 77.1% (491/637) with 70.0% (341/487) sensitivity and 100% specificity (150/150). When inconclusive results of the Lumipulse Ag test were excluded, the overall concordance rate of the Lumipulse Ag test was 88.3% (467/529) with 84.8% (330/389) sensitivity and 97.9% (137/140) specificity. The overall concordance rate between the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests was 97.9% (518/529) with 96.7% (322/333) sensitivity and 100% (196/196) specificity. Quantitative Ag levels determined using the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.922). The Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests showed high concordance up to nine days after symptom onset, with progressively lower concordance after that. CONCLUSIONS: The Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests showed equivalent assay performance and represent promising approaches for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81664572021-06-01 Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19 Hirotsu, Yosuke Sugiura, Hiroki Maejima, Makoto Hayakawa, Miyoko Mochizuki, Hitoshi Tsutsui, Toshiharu Kakizaki, Yumiko Miyashita, Yoshihiro Omata, Masao Int J Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide. Here, we evaluated the performance of two quantitative antigen (Ag) tests, the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests, using automated platforms. METHODS: We collected 637 nasopharyngeal swab samples from 274 individuals. Samples were subjected to quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), the Roche Ag test and Lumipulse Ag test. RESULTS: When RT-qPCR was used as a reference, the overall concordance rate of the Roche Ag test was 77.1% (491/637) with 70.0% (341/487) sensitivity and 100% specificity (150/150). When inconclusive results of the Lumipulse Ag test were excluded, the overall concordance rate of the Lumipulse Ag test was 88.3% (467/529) with 84.8% (330/389) sensitivity and 97.9% (137/140) specificity. The overall concordance rate between the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests was 97.9% (518/529) with 96.7% (322/333) sensitivity and 100% (196/196) specificity. Quantitative Ag levels determined using the Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.922). The Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests showed high concordance up to nine days after symptom onset, with progressively lower concordance after that. CONCLUSIONS: The Roche and Lumipulse Ag tests showed equivalent assay performance and represent promising approaches for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-07 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8166457/ /pubmed/34082089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.067 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Hirotsu, Yosuke
Sugiura, Hiroki
Maejima, Makoto
Hayakawa, Miyoko
Mochizuki, Hitoshi
Tsutsui, Toshiharu
Kakizaki, Yumiko
Miyashita, Yoshihiro
Omata, Masao
Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_fullStr Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_short Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_sort comparison of roche and lumipulse quantitative sars-cov-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.067
work_keys_str_mv AT hirotsuyosuke comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT sugiurahiroki comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT maejimamakoto comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT hayakawamiyoko comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT mochizukihitoshi comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT tsutsuitoshiharu comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT kakizakiyumiko comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT miyashitayoshihiro comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19
AT omatamasao comparisonofrocheandlumipulsequantitativesarscov2antigentestperformanceusingautomatedsystemsforthediagnosisofcovid19