Cargando…
Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099 |
_version_ | 1783701522508414976 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Minal K. Bergeri, Isabel Bresee, Joseph S. Cowling, Benjamin J. Crowcroft, Natasha S. Fahmy, Kamal Hirve, Siddhivinayak Kang, Gagandeep Katz, Mark A. Lanata, Claudio F. L'Azou Jackson, Maïna Joshi, Sudhir Lipsitch, Marc Mwenda, Jason M. Nogareda, Francisco Orenstein, Walter A. Ortiz, Justin R. Pebody, Richard Schrag, Stephanie J. Smith, Peter G. Srikantiah, Padmini Subissi, Lorenzo Valenciano, Marta Vaughn, David W. Verani, Jennifer R. Wilder-Smith, Annelies Feikin, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Patel, Minal K. Bergeri, Isabel Bresee, Joseph S. Cowling, Benjamin J. Crowcroft, Natasha S. Fahmy, Kamal Hirve, Siddhivinayak Kang, Gagandeep Katz, Mark A. Lanata, Claudio F. L'Azou Jackson, Maïna Joshi, Sudhir Lipsitch, Marc Mwenda, Jason M. Nogareda, Francisco Orenstein, Walter A. Ortiz, Justin R. Pebody, Richard Schrag, Stephanie J. Smith, Peter G. Srikantiah, Padmini Subissi, Lorenzo Valenciano, Marta Vaughn, David W. Verani, Jennifer R. Wilder-Smith, Annelies Feikin, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Patel, Minal K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during the clinical trials, strict eligibility criteria, emerging variants of concern, and the changing epidemiology of the pandemic, many questions still remain unanswered regarding vaccine performance. Post-introduction vaccine effectiveness evaluations can help us to understand the vaccine's effect on reducing infection and disease when used in real-world conditions. They can also address important questions that were either not studied or were incompletely studied in the trials and that will inform evolving vaccine policy, including assessment of the duration of effectiveness; effectiveness in key subpopulations, such as the very old or immunocompromised; against severe disease and death due to COVID-19; against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern; and with different vaccination schedules, such as number of doses and varying dosing intervals. WHO convened an expert panel to develop interim best practice guidance for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness evaluations. We present a summary of the interim guidance, including discussion of different study designs, priority outcomes to evaluate, potential biases, existing surveillance platforms that can be used, and recommendations for reporting results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8166525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81665252021-06-01 Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization Patel, Minal K. Bergeri, Isabel Bresee, Joseph S. Cowling, Benjamin J. Crowcroft, Natasha S. Fahmy, Kamal Hirve, Siddhivinayak Kang, Gagandeep Katz, Mark A. Lanata, Claudio F. L'Azou Jackson, Maïna Joshi, Sudhir Lipsitch, Marc Mwenda, Jason M. Nogareda, Francisco Orenstein, Walter A. Ortiz, Justin R. Pebody, Richard Schrag, Stephanie J. Smith, Peter G. Srikantiah, Padmini Subissi, Lorenzo Valenciano, Marta Vaughn, David W. Verani, Jennifer R. Wilder-Smith, Annelies Feikin, Daniel R. Vaccine Conference Report Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during the clinical trials, strict eligibility criteria, emerging variants of concern, and the changing epidemiology of the pandemic, many questions still remain unanswered regarding vaccine performance. Post-introduction vaccine effectiveness evaluations can help us to understand the vaccine's effect on reducing infection and disease when used in real-world conditions. They can also address important questions that were either not studied or were incompletely studied in the trials and that will inform evolving vaccine policy, including assessment of the duration of effectiveness; effectiveness in key subpopulations, such as the very old or immunocompromised; against severe disease and death due to COVID-19; against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern; and with different vaccination schedules, such as number of doses and varying dosing intervals. WHO convened an expert panel to develop interim best practice guidance for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness evaluations. We present a summary of the interim guidance, including discussion of different study designs, priority outcomes to evaluate, potential biases, existing surveillance platforms that can be used, and recommendations for reporting results. Elsevier Science 2021-07-05 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8166525/ /pubmed/34119350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Conference Report Patel, Minal K. Bergeri, Isabel Bresee, Joseph S. Cowling, Benjamin J. Crowcroft, Natasha S. Fahmy, Kamal Hirve, Siddhivinayak Kang, Gagandeep Katz, Mark A. Lanata, Claudio F. L'Azou Jackson, Maïna Joshi, Sudhir Lipsitch, Marc Mwenda, Jason M. Nogareda, Francisco Orenstein, Walter A. Ortiz, Justin R. Pebody, Richard Schrag, Stephanie J. Smith, Peter G. Srikantiah, Padmini Subissi, Lorenzo Valenciano, Marta Vaughn, David W. Verani, Jennifer R. Wilder-Smith, Annelies Feikin, Daniel R. Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title | Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title_full | Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title_short | Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization |
title_sort | evaluation of post-introduction covid-19 vaccine effectiveness: summary of interim guidance of the world health organization |
topic | Conference Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelminalk evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT bergeriisabel evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT breseejosephs evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT cowlingbenjaminj evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT crowcroftnatashas evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT fahmykamal evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT hirvesiddhivinayak evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT kanggagandeep evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT katzmarka evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT lanataclaudiof evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT lazoujacksonmaina evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT joshisudhir evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT lipsitchmarc evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT mwendajasonm evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT nogaredafrancisco evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT orensteinwaltera evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT ortizjustinr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT pebodyrichard evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT schragstephaniej evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT smithpeterg evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT srikantiahpadmini evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT subissilorenzo evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT valencianomarta evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT vaughndavidw evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT veranijenniferr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT wildersmithannelies evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization AT feikindanielr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization |