Cargando…

Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization

Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Minal K., Bergeri, Isabel, Bresee, Joseph S., Cowling, Benjamin J., Crowcroft, Natasha S., Fahmy, Kamal, Hirve, Siddhivinayak, Kang, Gagandeep, Katz, Mark A., Lanata, Claudio F., L'Azou Jackson, Maïna, Joshi, Sudhir, Lipsitch, Marc, Mwenda, Jason M., Nogareda, Francisco, Orenstein, Walter A., Ortiz, Justin R., Pebody, Richard, Schrag, Stephanie J., Smith, Peter G., Srikantiah, Padmini, Subissi, Lorenzo, Valenciano, Marta, Vaughn, David W., Verani, Jennifer R., Wilder-Smith, Annelies, Feikin, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099
_version_ 1783701522508414976
author Patel, Minal K.
Bergeri, Isabel
Bresee, Joseph S.
Cowling, Benjamin J.
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
Fahmy, Kamal
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Kang, Gagandeep
Katz, Mark A.
Lanata, Claudio F.
L'Azou Jackson, Maïna
Joshi, Sudhir
Lipsitch, Marc
Mwenda, Jason M.
Nogareda, Francisco
Orenstein, Walter A.
Ortiz, Justin R.
Pebody, Richard
Schrag, Stephanie J.
Smith, Peter G.
Srikantiah, Padmini
Subissi, Lorenzo
Valenciano, Marta
Vaughn, David W.
Verani, Jennifer R.
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Feikin, Daniel R.
author_facet Patel, Minal K.
Bergeri, Isabel
Bresee, Joseph S.
Cowling, Benjamin J.
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
Fahmy, Kamal
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Kang, Gagandeep
Katz, Mark A.
Lanata, Claudio F.
L'Azou Jackson, Maïna
Joshi, Sudhir
Lipsitch, Marc
Mwenda, Jason M.
Nogareda, Francisco
Orenstein, Walter A.
Ortiz, Justin R.
Pebody, Richard
Schrag, Stephanie J.
Smith, Peter G.
Srikantiah, Padmini
Subissi, Lorenzo
Valenciano, Marta
Vaughn, David W.
Verani, Jennifer R.
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Feikin, Daniel R.
author_sort Patel, Minal K.
collection PubMed
description Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during the clinical trials, strict eligibility criteria, emerging variants of concern, and the changing epidemiology of the pandemic, many questions still remain unanswered regarding vaccine performance. Post-introduction vaccine effectiveness evaluations can help us to understand the vaccine's effect on reducing infection and disease when used in real-world conditions. They can also address important questions that were either not studied or were incompletely studied in the trials and that will inform evolving vaccine policy, including assessment of the duration of effectiveness; effectiveness in key subpopulations, such as the very old or immunocompromised; against severe disease and death due to COVID-19; against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern; and with different vaccination schedules, such as number of doses and varying dosing intervals. WHO convened an expert panel to develop interim best practice guidance for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness evaluations. We present a summary of the interim guidance, including discussion of different study designs, priority outcomes to evaluate, potential biases, existing surveillance platforms that can be used, and recommendations for reporting results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81665252021-06-01 Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization Patel, Minal K. Bergeri, Isabel Bresee, Joseph S. Cowling, Benjamin J. Crowcroft, Natasha S. Fahmy, Kamal Hirve, Siddhivinayak Kang, Gagandeep Katz, Mark A. Lanata, Claudio F. L'Azou Jackson, Maïna Joshi, Sudhir Lipsitch, Marc Mwenda, Jason M. Nogareda, Francisco Orenstein, Walter A. Ortiz, Justin R. Pebody, Richard Schrag, Stephanie J. Smith, Peter G. Srikantiah, Padmini Subissi, Lorenzo Valenciano, Marta Vaughn, David W. Verani, Jennifer R. Wilder-Smith, Annelies Feikin, Daniel R. Vaccine Conference Report Phase 3 randomized-controlled trials have provided promising results of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, ranging from 50 to 95% against symptomatic disease as the primary endpoints, resulting in emergency use authorization/listing for several vaccines. However, given the short duration of follow-up during the clinical trials, strict eligibility criteria, emerging variants of concern, and the changing epidemiology of the pandemic, many questions still remain unanswered regarding vaccine performance. Post-introduction vaccine effectiveness evaluations can help us to understand the vaccine's effect on reducing infection and disease when used in real-world conditions. They can also address important questions that were either not studied or were incompletely studied in the trials and that will inform evolving vaccine policy, including assessment of the duration of effectiveness; effectiveness in key subpopulations, such as the very old or immunocompromised; against severe disease and death due to COVID-19; against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern; and with different vaccination schedules, such as number of doses and varying dosing intervals. WHO convened an expert panel to develop interim best practice guidance for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness evaluations. We present a summary of the interim guidance, including discussion of different study designs, priority outcomes to evaluate, potential biases, existing surveillance platforms that can be used, and recommendations for reporting results. Elsevier Science 2021-07-05 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8166525/ /pubmed/34119350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Conference Report
Patel, Minal K.
Bergeri, Isabel
Bresee, Joseph S.
Cowling, Benjamin J.
Crowcroft, Natasha S.
Fahmy, Kamal
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Kang, Gagandeep
Katz, Mark A.
Lanata, Claudio F.
L'Azou Jackson, Maïna
Joshi, Sudhir
Lipsitch, Marc
Mwenda, Jason M.
Nogareda, Francisco
Orenstein, Walter A.
Ortiz, Justin R.
Pebody, Richard
Schrag, Stephanie J.
Smith, Peter G.
Srikantiah, Padmini
Subissi, Lorenzo
Valenciano, Marta
Vaughn, David W.
Verani, Jennifer R.
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Feikin, Daniel R.
Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title_full Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title_fullStr Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title_short Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization
title_sort evaluation of post-introduction covid-19 vaccine effectiveness: summary of interim guidance of the world health organization
topic Conference Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.099
work_keys_str_mv AT patelminalk evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT bergeriisabel evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT breseejosephs evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT cowlingbenjaminj evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT crowcroftnatashas evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT fahmykamal evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT hirvesiddhivinayak evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT kanggagandeep evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT katzmarka evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT lanataclaudiof evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT lazoujacksonmaina evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT joshisudhir evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT lipsitchmarc evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT mwendajasonm evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT nogaredafrancisco evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT orensteinwaltera evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT ortizjustinr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT pebodyrichard evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT schragstephaniej evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT smithpeterg evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT srikantiahpadmini evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT subissilorenzo evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT valencianomarta evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT vaughndavidw evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT veranijenniferr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT wildersmithannelies evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization
AT feikindanielr evaluationofpostintroductioncovid19vaccineeffectivenesssummaryofinterimguidanceoftheworldhealthorganization