Cargando…

Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to train a large number of healthcare workers (HCW) within a limited time to ensure adequate human resources during an epidemic. There remains an urgent need for best practices on development and implementation of training programmes. OBJECTIVE: To explore published liter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayahangan, Leizl Joy, Konge, Lars, Russell, Lene, Andersen, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044111
_version_ 1783701536761708544
author Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
Konge, Lars
Russell, Lene
Andersen, Steven
author_facet Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
Konge, Lars
Russell, Lene
Andersen, Steven
author_sort Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is necessary to train a large number of healthcare workers (HCW) within a limited time to ensure adequate human resources during an epidemic. There remains an urgent need for best practices on development and implementation of training programmes. OBJECTIVE: To explore published literature in relation to training and education for viral epidemics as well as the effect of these interventions to inform training of HCW. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches in five databases performed between 1 January 2000 and 24 April 2020 for studies reporting on educational interventions in response to major viral epidemics. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies on educational interventions developed, implemented and evaluated in response to major global viral outbreaks from 2000 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers. INTERVENTIONS: Educational or training interventions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Descriptive information were extracted and synthesised according to content, competency category, educational methodology, educational effects and level of educational outcome. Quality appraisal was performed using a criterion-based checklist. RESULTS: A total of 15 676 records were identified and 46 studies were included. Most studies were motivated by the Ebola virus outbreak with doctors and nurses as primary learners. Traditional didactic methods were commonly used to teach theoretical knowledge. Simulation-based training was used mainly for training of technical skills, such as donning and doffing of personal protective equipment. Evaluation of the interventions consisted mostly of surveys on learner satisfaction and confidence or tests of knowledge and skills. Only three studies investigated transfer to the clinical setting or effect on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: The included studies describe important educational experiences from past epidemics with a variety of educational content, design and modes of delivery. High-level educational evidence is limited. Evidence-based and standardised training programmes that are easily adapted locally are recommended in preparation for future outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81666302021-06-14 Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review Nayahangan, Leizl Joy Konge, Lars Russell, Lene Andersen, Steven BMJ Open Medical Education and Training BACKGROUND: It is necessary to train a large number of healthcare workers (HCW) within a limited time to ensure adequate human resources during an epidemic. There remains an urgent need for best practices on development and implementation of training programmes. OBJECTIVE: To explore published literature in relation to training and education for viral epidemics as well as the effect of these interventions to inform training of HCW. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches in five databases performed between 1 January 2000 and 24 April 2020 for studies reporting on educational interventions in response to major viral epidemics. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies on educational interventions developed, implemented and evaluated in response to major global viral outbreaks from 2000 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers. INTERVENTIONS: Educational or training interventions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Descriptive information were extracted and synthesised according to content, competency category, educational methodology, educational effects and level of educational outcome. Quality appraisal was performed using a criterion-based checklist. RESULTS: A total of 15 676 records were identified and 46 studies were included. Most studies were motivated by the Ebola virus outbreak with doctors and nurses as primary learners. Traditional didactic methods were commonly used to teach theoretical knowledge. Simulation-based training was used mainly for training of technical skills, such as donning and doffing of personal protective equipment. Evaluation of the interventions consisted mostly of surveys on learner satisfaction and confidence or tests of knowledge and skills. Only three studies investigated transfer to the clinical setting or effect on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: The included studies describe important educational experiences from past epidemics with a variety of educational content, design and modes of delivery. High-level educational evidence is limited. Evidence-based and standardised training programmes that are easily adapted locally are recommended in preparation for future outbreaks. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8166630/ /pubmed/34049907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044111 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
Konge, Lars
Russell, Lene
Andersen, Steven
Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title_full Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title_fullStr Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title_short Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
title_sort training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34049907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044111
work_keys_str_mv AT nayahanganleizljoy trainingandeducationofhealthcareworkersduringviralepidemicsasystematicreview
AT kongelars trainingandeducationofhealthcareworkersduringviralepidemicsasystematicreview
AT russelllene trainingandeducationofhealthcareworkersduringviralepidemicsasystematicreview
AT andersensteven trainingandeducationofhealthcareworkersduringviralepidemicsasystematicreview