Cargando…

Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management

INTRODUCTION: Pericardial access for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be gained either by an anterior-oriented or inferior-oriented epicardial puncture under fluoroscopical guidance. We retrospectively sought to assess the safety of these two puncture techniques and the incidence of epic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathew, Shibu, Feickert, Sebastian, Fink, Thomas, Rillig, Andreas, Reissmann, Bruno, Rottner, Laura, Hashiguchi, Naotaka, Wohlmuth, Peter, Maurer, Tilman, Lemes, Christine, Metzner, Andreas, Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Ouyang, Feifan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01711-z
_version_ 1783701546894098432
author Mathew, Shibu
Feickert, Sebastian
Fink, Thomas
Rillig, Andreas
Reissmann, Bruno
Rottner, Laura
Hashiguchi, Naotaka
Wohlmuth, Peter
Maurer, Tilman
Lemes, Christine
Metzner, Andreas
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Ouyang, Feifan
author_facet Mathew, Shibu
Feickert, Sebastian
Fink, Thomas
Rillig, Andreas
Reissmann, Bruno
Rottner, Laura
Hashiguchi, Naotaka
Wohlmuth, Peter
Maurer, Tilman
Lemes, Christine
Metzner, Andreas
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Ouyang, Feifan
author_sort Mathew, Shibu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pericardial access for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be gained either by an anterior-oriented or inferior-oriented epicardial puncture under fluoroscopical guidance. We retrospectively sought to assess the safety of these two puncture techniques and the incidence of epicardial adhesions and introduce our algorithm for management of pericardial tamponade. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 211 patients (61.4 ± 15.6 years, 179 males; 84.8%) 271 epicardial ablation procedures of VA were performed using either an anterior- or inferior-oriented approach for epicardial access. Puncture-related complications were systematically analyzed. Furthermore, the incidence of adhesions was evaluated during first and repeated procedures. A total of 34/271 (12.5%) major complications occurred and 23/271 (8.5%) were directly related to epicardial puncture. The incidence of puncture-related major complications in the anterior and inferior group was 4/82 (4.9%) and 19/189 (10.1%), respectively. Pericardial tamponade was the most common major complication (15/271; 5.5%). Collateral damages of adjacent structures such as liver, colon, gastric vessels and coronary arteries occurred in 6/189 (3.2%) patients and only within the inferior epicardial access group. Adhesions were documented in 19/211 (9%) patients during the first procedure and in 47.1% if patients had 2 or more procedures involving epicardial access. CONCLUSION: Anterior-oriented epicardial puncture shows an observed association to a reduced incidence of pericardial tamponades and overall puncture-related complications in epicardial ablation of VA. In cases of repeated epicardial access adhesions increase significantly and may lead to ablation failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81666842021-06-03 Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management Mathew, Shibu Feickert, Sebastian Fink, Thomas Rillig, Andreas Reissmann, Bruno Rottner, Laura Hashiguchi, Naotaka Wohlmuth, Peter Maurer, Tilman Lemes, Christine Metzner, Andreas Kuck, Karl-Heinz Ouyang, Feifan Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Pericardial access for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be gained either by an anterior-oriented or inferior-oriented epicardial puncture under fluoroscopical guidance. We retrospectively sought to assess the safety of these two puncture techniques and the incidence of epicardial adhesions and introduce our algorithm for management of pericardial tamponade. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 211 patients (61.4 ± 15.6 years, 179 males; 84.8%) 271 epicardial ablation procedures of VA were performed using either an anterior- or inferior-oriented approach for epicardial access. Puncture-related complications were systematically analyzed. Furthermore, the incidence of adhesions was evaluated during first and repeated procedures. A total of 34/271 (12.5%) major complications occurred and 23/271 (8.5%) were directly related to epicardial puncture. The incidence of puncture-related major complications in the anterior and inferior group was 4/82 (4.9%) and 19/189 (10.1%), respectively. Pericardial tamponade was the most common major complication (15/271; 5.5%). Collateral damages of adjacent structures such as liver, colon, gastric vessels and coronary arteries occurred in 6/189 (3.2%) patients and only within the inferior epicardial access group. Adhesions were documented in 19/211 (9%) patients during the first procedure and in 47.1% if patients had 2 or more procedures involving epicardial access. CONCLUSION: Anterior-oriented epicardial puncture shows an observed association to a reduced incidence of pericardial tamponades and overall puncture-related complications in epicardial ablation of VA. In cases of repeated epicardial access adhesions increase significantly and may lead to ablation failure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8166684/ /pubmed/32719917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01711-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mathew, Shibu
Feickert, Sebastian
Fink, Thomas
Rillig, Andreas
Reissmann, Bruno
Rottner, Laura
Hashiguchi, Naotaka
Wohlmuth, Peter
Maurer, Tilman
Lemes, Christine
Metzner, Andreas
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Ouyang, Feifan
Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title_full Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title_fullStr Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title_full_unstemmed Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title_short Epicardial access for VT ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
title_sort epicardial access for vt ablation: analysis of two different puncture techniques, incidence of adhesions and complication management
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01711-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewshibu epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT feickertsebastian epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT finkthomas epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT rilligandreas epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT reissmannbruno epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT rottnerlaura epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT hashiguchinaotaka epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT wohlmuthpeter epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT maurertilman epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT lemeschristine epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT metznerandreas epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT kuckkarlheinz epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement
AT ouyangfeifan epicardialaccessforvtablationanalysisoftwodifferentpuncturetechniquesincidenceofadhesionsandcomplicationmanagement