Cargando…

Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine how successful reconstruction of the mandible can recover the symmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical treatment for unilateral mandibular reconstruction in 4 years were retrospectively examined. Bilateral differences of gonion (G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh, Khojastepour, Leila, Ahmadi, Hanie, Tavanafar, Saeid, Ebrahimi, Alireza, Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00299-2
_version_ 1783701607153664000
author Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh
Khojastepour, Leila
Ahmadi, Hanie
Tavanafar, Saeid
Ebrahimi, Alireza
Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, Mohammad
author_facet Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh
Khojastepour, Leila
Ahmadi, Hanie
Tavanafar, Saeid
Ebrahimi, Alireza
Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, Mohammad
author_sort Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine how successful reconstruction of the mandible can recover the symmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical treatment for unilateral mandibular reconstruction in 4 years were retrospectively examined. Bilateral differences of gonion (GO) positions were measured in 3 dimensions based on immediate postoperative computed tomography. The data collected was analyzed in 3 ways: First, the comparison of bilateral differences of GO in 3 dimensions. Second, the mean Asymmetry Index in control subjects was used to divide all cases into three groups: “Symmetry,” “Asymmetry,” and “Marked asymmetry.” Third, “maximum normal asymmetry” was calculated, and all cases were categorized as below and above maximum normal asymmetry. The difference between two gonial angles was used to determine the amount of asymmetry. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients and 47 normal adults were enrolled. The mean bilateral GO difference in the control group was higher than in the study group patients, but it was not statistically significant. The mean Asymmetry Index for the control group was not also significantly higher than the study cases. The study group was “Symmetric” in 78.7% of the cases whereas the control group in 91.4%, 19.1% of the study group and 8.5% of controls were “Asymmetric,” and 2.1% of study cases and 0% of controls were “Markedly Asymmetric.” Maximum normal asymmetry was 82.9% in the study group and 97.8% in the control group. The mean differences between the right and left gonial angles were higher in the study group, but it was not significant (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our study’s results showed that bilateral symmetry in mandibular reconstruction patients was satisfactory and similar to the normal individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8166985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81669852021-06-17 Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh Khojastepour, Leila Ahmadi, Hanie Tavanafar, Saeid Ebrahimi, Alireza Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, Mohammad Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine how successful reconstruction of the mandible can recover the symmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical treatment for unilateral mandibular reconstruction in 4 years were retrospectively examined. Bilateral differences of gonion (GO) positions were measured in 3 dimensions based on immediate postoperative computed tomography. The data collected was analyzed in 3 ways: First, the comparison of bilateral differences of GO in 3 dimensions. Second, the mean Asymmetry Index in control subjects was used to divide all cases into three groups: “Symmetry,” “Asymmetry,” and “Marked asymmetry.” Third, “maximum normal asymmetry” was calculated, and all cases were categorized as below and above maximum normal asymmetry. The difference between two gonial angles was used to determine the amount of asymmetry. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients and 47 normal adults were enrolled. The mean bilateral GO difference in the control group was higher than in the study group patients, but it was not statistically significant. The mean Asymmetry Index for the control group was not also significantly higher than the study cases. The study group was “Symmetric” in 78.7% of the cases whereas the control group in 91.4%, 19.1% of the study group and 8.5% of controls were “Asymmetric,” and 2.1% of study cases and 0% of controls were “Markedly Asymmetric.” Maximum normal asymmetry was 82.9% in the study group and 97.8% in the control group. The mean differences between the right and left gonial angles were higher in the study group, but it was not significant (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our study’s results showed that bilateral symmetry in mandibular reconstruction patients was satisfactory and similar to the normal individuals. Springer Singapore 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8166985/ /pubmed/34059964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00299-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Khaghaninejad, Mohamad Saleh
Khojastepour, Leila
Ahmadi, Hanie
Tavanafar, Saeid
Ebrahimi, Alireza
Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, Mohammad
Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title_full Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title_fullStr Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title_short Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
title_sort analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8166985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00299-2
work_keys_str_mv AT khaghaninejadmohamadsaleh analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction
AT khojastepourleila analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction
AT ahmadihanie analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction
AT tavanafarsaeid analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction
AT ebrahimialireza analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction
AT mahjoorighasrodashtimohammad analysisofhardtissuefacialsymmetryafterunilateralmandibularreconstruction