Cargando…
Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness
Postural sway is a result of a complex action–reaction feedback mechanism generated by the interplay between the environment, the sensory perception, the neural system and the musculation. Postural oscillations are complex, possibly even chaotic. Therefore fitting deterministic models on measured ti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90305-4 |
_version_ | 1783701621673295872 |
---|---|
author | Zelei, Ambrus Milton, John Stepan, Gabor Insperger, Tamas |
author_facet | Zelei, Ambrus Milton, John Stepan, Gabor Insperger, Tamas |
author_sort | Zelei, Ambrus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postural sway is a result of a complex action–reaction feedback mechanism generated by the interplay between the environment, the sensory perception, the neural system and the musculation. Postural oscillations are complex, possibly even chaotic. Therefore fitting deterministic models on measured time signals is ambiguous. Here we analyse the response to large enough perturbations during quiet standing such that the resulting responses can clearly be distinguished from the local postural sway. Measurements show that typical responses very closely resemble those of a critically damped oscillator. The recovery dynamics are modelled by an inverted pendulum subject to delayed state feedback and is described in the space of the control parameters. We hypothesize that the control gains are tuned such that (H1) the response is at the border of oscillatory and nonoscillatory motion similarly to the critically damped oscillator; (H2) the response is the fastest possible; (H3) the response is a result of a combined optimization of fast response and robustness to sensory perturbations. Parameter fitting shows that H1 and H3 are accepted while H2 is rejected. Thus, the responses of human postural balance to “large” perturbations matches a delayed feedback mechanism that is optimized for a combination of performance and robustness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8167093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81670932021-06-02 Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness Zelei, Ambrus Milton, John Stepan, Gabor Insperger, Tamas Sci Rep Article Postural sway is a result of a complex action–reaction feedback mechanism generated by the interplay between the environment, the sensory perception, the neural system and the musculation. Postural oscillations are complex, possibly even chaotic. Therefore fitting deterministic models on measured time signals is ambiguous. Here we analyse the response to large enough perturbations during quiet standing such that the resulting responses can clearly be distinguished from the local postural sway. Measurements show that typical responses very closely resemble those of a critically damped oscillator. The recovery dynamics are modelled by an inverted pendulum subject to delayed state feedback and is described in the space of the control parameters. We hypothesize that the control gains are tuned such that (H1) the response is at the border of oscillatory and nonoscillatory motion similarly to the critically damped oscillator; (H2) the response is the fastest possible; (H3) the response is a result of a combined optimization of fast response and robustness to sensory perturbations. Parameter fitting shows that H1 and H3 are accepted while H2 is rejected. Thus, the responses of human postural balance to “large” perturbations matches a delayed feedback mechanism that is optimized for a combination of performance and robustness. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8167093/ /pubmed/34059718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90305-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zelei, Ambrus Milton, John Stepan, Gabor Insperger, Tamas Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title | Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title_full | Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title_fullStr | Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title_short | Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
title_sort | response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34059718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90305-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeleiambrus responsetoperturbationduringquietstandingresemblesdelayedstatefeedbackoptimizedforperformanceandrobustness AT miltonjohn responsetoperturbationduringquietstandingresemblesdelayedstatefeedbackoptimizedforperformanceandrobustness AT stepangabor responsetoperturbationduringquietstandingresemblesdelayedstatefeedbackoptimizedforperformanceandrobustness AT inspergertamas responsetoperturbationduringquietstandingresemblesdelayedstatefeedbackoptimizedforperformanceandrobustness |