Cargando…

Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos

OBJECTIVE: To compare the basic airway and the advanced airway with the supraglottic device I-Gel®, by means of capnography during intermediate CPR. DESIGN: Randomized experimental pilot study by groups. SETTING: Out-hospital care basic life support units on the Island of Mallorca. PARTICIPANTS: Adu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José, Clar-Terradas, Juan, Moros-Albert, Rut, Mascaró-Galmés, Andreu, Navarro-Miró, Miguel, Molina-Mula, Jesús
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102062
_version_ 1783701636811587584
author Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José
Clar-Terradas, Juan
Moros-Albert, Rut
Mascaró-Galmés, Andreu
Navarro-Miró, Miguel
Molina-Mula, Jesús
author_facet Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José
Clar-Terradas, Juan
Moros-Albert, Rut
Mascaró-Galmés, Andreu
Navarro-Miró, Miguel
Molina-Mula, Jesús
author_sort Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the basic airway and the advanced airway with the supraglottic device I-Gel®, by means of capnography during intermediate CPR. DESIGN: Randomized experimental pilot study by groups. SETTING: Out-hospital care basic life support units on the Island of Mallorca. PARTICIPANTS: Adults attended after cardiorespiratory arrest of non-traumatic origin. INTERVENTIONS: Advanced airway management during instrumental CPR with I-Gel® or basic CPR with bag-valve-mask, under capnographic monitoring. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Capnometric levels obtained according to the device used, number of insertions of the I-Gel®, cases without achieving correct insertion/ventilation by branches, achievement of ROSC in CPR and number of hospital live admissions. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases were recruited for analysis. The insertion success rate of the I-Gel® was 92.9% at the first attempt, the mean capnometric values were 16.3 mmHg in the control group and 27.4% in the intervention group. 34.8% (n = 8) of the patients achieved spontaneous circulation recovery at some point and 26.1% (n = 6) were admitted to hospital alive. The survival analysis, taking into account the arrival of the unit and the first minute of ventilations recorded together with the variable hospital admission, suggests a certain trend of greater survival in the intervention branch (P = .066). CONCLUSIONS: The use of I-Gel® raises an improvement in the ventilation of the patients in PCR, evidenced by the mean capnometric values in the intervention group, finding no correlation with CPR outcome variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81671612021-06-05 Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José Clar-Terradas, Juan Moros-Albert, Rut Mascaró-Galmés, Andreu Navarro-Miró, Miguel Molina-Mula, Jesús Aten Primaria Original OBJECTIVE: To compare the basic airway and the advanced airway with the supraglottic device I-Gel®, by means of capnography during intermediate CPR. DESIGN: Randomized experimental pilot study by groups. SETTING: Out-hospital care basic life support units on the Island of Mallorca. PARTICIPANTS: Adults attended after cardiorespiratory arrest of non-traumatic origin. INTERVENTIONS: Advanced airway management during instrumental CPR with I-Gel® or basic CPR with bag-valve-mask, under capnographic monitoring. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Capnometric levels obtained according to the device used, number of insertions of the I-Gel®, cases without achieving correct insertion/ventilation by branches, achievement of ROSC in CPR and number of hospital live admissions. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases were recruited for analysis. The insertion success rate of the I-Gel® was 92.9% at the first attempt, the mean capnometric values were 16.3 mmHg in the control group and 27.4% in the intervention group. 34.8% (n = 8) of the patients achieved spontaneous circulation recovery at some point and 26.1% (n = 6) were admitted to hospital alive. The survival analysis, taking into account the arrival of the unit and the first minute of ventilations recorded together with the variable hospital admission, suggests a certain trend of greater survival in the intervention branch (P = .066). CONCLUSIONS: The use of I-Gel® raises an improvement in the ventilation of the patients in PCR, evidenced by the mean capnometric values in the intervention group, finding no correlation with CPR outcome variables. Elsevier 2021-11 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8167161/ /pubmed/34044355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102062 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original
Cereceda-Sánchez, Francisco José
Clar-Terradas, Juan
Moros-Albert, Rut
Mascaró-Galmés, Andreu
Navarro-Miró, Miguel
Molina-Mula, Jesús
Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title_full Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title_fullStr Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title_full_unstemmed Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title_short Máscara laríngea I-Gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
title_sort máscara laríngea i-gel® versus bolsa-válvula-mascarilla en la reanimación cardiopulmonar instrumental bajo monitorización capnográfica: ensayo clínico piloto aleatorizado por grupos
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34044355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102062
work_keys_str_mv AT cerecedasanchezfranciscojose mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos
AT clarterradasjuan mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos
AT morosalbertrut mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos
AT mascarogalmesandreu mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos
AT navarromiromiguel mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos
AT molinamulajesus mascaralaringeaigelversusbolsavalvulamascarillaenlareanimacioncardiopulmonarinstrumentalbajomonitorizacioncapnograficaensayoclinicopilotoaleatorizadoporgrupos