Cargando…
Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835034 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479 |
_version_ | 1783701731292479488 |
---|---|
author | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip O'Connor, Siobhan Akinlua, James Tosin Wark, Petra A Gallagher, Joseph Carroll, Christopher Car, Josip Majeed, Azeem O'Donoghue, John |
author_facet | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip O'Connor, Siobhan Akinlua, James Tosin Wark, Petra A Gallagher, Joseph Carroll, Christopher Car, Josip Majeed, Azeem O'Donoghue, John |
author_sort | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. METHODS: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. RESULTS: We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8167621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81676212021-06-11 Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip O'Connor, Siobhan Akinlua, James Tosin Wark, Petra A Gallagher, Joseph Carroll, Christopher Car, Josip Majeed, Azeem O'Donoghue, John J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. METHODS: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. RESULTS: We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722 JMIR Publications 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8167621/ /pubmed/33835034 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479 Text en ©Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Siobhan O'Connor, James Tosin Akinlua, Petra A Wark, Joseph Gallagher, Christopher Carroll, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, John O'Donoghue. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip O'Connor, Siobhan Akinlua, James Tosin Wark, Petra A Gallagher, Joseph Carroll, Christopher Car, Josip Majeed, Azeem O'Donoghue, John Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title | Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title_full | Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title_short | Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review |
title_sort | information quality frameworks for digital health technologies: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835034 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fadahunsikayodephilip informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT oconnorsiobhan informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT akinluajamestosin informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT warkpetraa informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT gallagherjoseph informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT carrollchristopher informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT carjosip informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT majeedazeem informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview AT odonoghuejohn informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview |