Cargando…

Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip, O'Connor, Siobhan, Akinlua, James Tosin, Wark, Petra A, Gallagher, Joseph, Carroll, Christopher, Car, Josip, Majeed, Azeem, O'Donoghue, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835034
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479
_version_ 1783701731292479488
author Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
O'Connor, Siobhan
Akinlua, James Tosin
Wark, Petra A
Gallagher, Joseph
Carroll, Christopher
Car, Josip
Majeed, Azeem
O'Donoghue, John
author_facet Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
O'Connor, Siobhan
Akinlua, James Tosin
Wark, Petra A
Gallagher, Joseph
Carroll, Christopher
Car, Josip
Majeed, Azeem
O'Donoghue, John
author_sort Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. METHODS: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. RESULTS: We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81676212021-06-11 Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip O'Connor, Siobhan Akinlua, James Tosin Wark, Petra A Gallagher, Joseph Carroll, Christopher Car, Josip Majeed, Azeem O'Donoghue, John J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. METHODS: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. RESULTS: We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722 JMIR Publications 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8167621/ /pubmed/33835034 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479 Text en ©Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Siobhan O'Connor, James Tosin Akinlua, Petra A Wark, Joseph Gallagher, Christopher Carroll, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, John O'Donoghue. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
O'Connor, Siobhan
Akinlua, James Tosin
Wark, Petra A
Gallagher, Joseph
Carroll, Christopher
Car, Josip
Majeed, Azeem
O'Donoghue, John
Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title_full Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title_short Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review
title_sort information quality frameworks for digital health technologies: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835034
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23479
work_keys_str_mv AT fadahunsikayodephilip informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT oconnorsiobhan informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT akinluajamestosin informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT warkpetraa informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT gallagherjoseph informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT carrollchristopher informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT carjosip informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT majeedazeem informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview
AT odonoghuejohn informationqualityframeworksfordigitalhealthtechnologiessystematicreview