Cargando…

Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review

The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira, Eduardo, Fonseca, Hélder, Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio, Veras, Lucas, Boppre, Giorjines, Oliveira, José, Pinto, Diogo, Alves, Alberto Jorge, Barbosa, Ana, Mendes, Romeu, Marques-Aleixo, Inês
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038
_version_ 1783701739845713920
author Teixeira, Eduardo
Fonseca, Hélder
Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio
Veras, Lucas
Boppre, Giorjines
Oliveira, José
Pinto, Diogo
Alves, Alberto Jorge
Barbosa, Ana
Mendes, Romeu
Marques-Aleixo, Inês
author_facet Teixeira, Eduardo
Fonseca, Hélder
Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio
Veras, Lucas
Boppre, Giorjines
Oliveira, José
Pinto, Diogo
Alves, Alberto Jorge
Barbosa, Ana
Mendes, Romeu
Marques-Aleixo, Inês
author_sort Teixeira, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects’ physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81676572021-06-02 Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review Teixeira, Eduardo Fonseca, Hélder Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio Veras, Lucas Boppre, Giorjines Oliveira, José Pinto, Diogo Alves, Alberto Jorge Barbosa, Ana Mendes, Romeu Marques-Aleixo, Inês Geriatrics (Basel) Review The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects’ physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people. MDPI 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8167657/ /pubmed/33917104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Teixeira, Eduardo
Fonseca, Hélder
Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio
Veras, Lucas
Boppre, Giorjines
Oliveira, José
Pinto, Diogo
Alves, Alberto Jorge
Barbosa, Ana
Mendes, Romeu
Marques-Aleixo, Inês
Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title_full Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title_short Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
title_sort wearable devices for physical activity and healthcare monitoring in elderly people: a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeiraeduardo wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT fonsecahelder wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT dinizsousaflorencio wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT veraslucas wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT boppregiorjines wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT oliveirajose wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT pintodiogo wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT alvesalbertojorge wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT barbosaana wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT mendesromeu wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview
AT marquesaleixoines wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview