Cargando…
Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review
The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038 |
_version_ | 1783701739845713920 |
---|---|
author | Teixeira, Eduardo Fonseca, Hélder Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio Veras, Lucas Boppre, Giorjines Oliveira, José Pinto, Diogo Alves, Alberto Jorge Barbosa, Ana Mendes, Romeu Marques-Aleixo, Inês |
author_facet | Teixeira, Eduardo Fonseca, Hélder Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio Veras, Lucas Boppre, Giorjines Oliveira, José Pinto, Diogo Alves, Alberto Jorge Barbosa, Ana Mendes, Romeu Marques-Aleixo, Inês |
author_sort | Teixeira, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects’ physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8167657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81676572021-06-02 Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review Teixeira, Eduardo Fonseca, Hélder Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio Veras, Lucas Boppre, Giorjines Oliveira, José Pinto, Diogo Alves, Alberto Jorge Barbosa, Ana Mendes, Romeu Marques-Aleixo, Inês Geriatrics (Basel) Review The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects’ physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people. MDPI 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8167657/ /pubmed/33917104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Teixeira, Eduardo Fonseca, Hélder Diniz-Sousa, Florêncio Veras, Lucas Boppre, Giorjines Oliveira, José Pinto, Diogo Alves, Alberto Jorge Barbosa, Ana Mendes, Romeu Marques-Aleixo, Inês Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title | Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title_full | Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title_fullStr | Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title_short | Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review |
title_sort | wearable devices for physical activity and healthcare monitoring in elderly people: a critical review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teixeiraeduardo wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT fonsecahelder wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT dinizsousaflorencio wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT veraslucas wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT boppregiorjines wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT oliveirajose wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT pintodiogo wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT alvesalbertojorge wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT barbosaana wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT mendesromeu wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview AT marquesaleixoines wearabledevicesforphysicalactivityandhealthcaremonitoringinelderlypeopleacriticalreview |