Cargando…

Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is a high rate of recurrence, and new approaches are required to improve surgical efficacy. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasaki, Takeshi, Nishikawa, Kouhei, Kato, Manabu, Masui, Satoru, Yoshio, Yuko, Sugimura, Yoshiki, Inoue, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020024
_version_ 1783701756004270080
author Sasaki, Takeshi
Nishikawa, Kouhei
Kato, Manabu
Masui, Satoru
Yoshio, Yuko
Sugimura, Yoshiki
Inoue, Takahiro
author_facet Sasaki, Takeshi
Nishikawa, Kouhei
Kato, Manabu
Masui, Satoru
Yoshio, Yuko
Sugimura, Yoshiki
Inoue, Takahiro
author_sort Sasaki, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is a high rate of recurrence, and new approaches are required to improve surgical efficacy. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before RP for Japanese patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From February 2009 to April 2016, 21 high-risk patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were treated with docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) every four weeks for three cycles and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Patients with grade 3–4 toxicities had 25% dose reductions for the following course. Results: Median follow-up was 88.6 months. The dose of docetaxel was reduced in 13 patients. The estimated five-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate was 57.1%. National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (high-risk, but not very high-risk (nVHR) versus VHR) was associated with bPFS (p = 0.03). Five-year bPFS rates in the nVHR and VHR groups were 76.9% and 25.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in bPFS between the nVHR and VHR groups (p = 0.023) by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Conclusions: Although our study included a small number of cases, at least in our exploration, NCHT was safe and feasible. However, more extensive treatment modalities are needed to improve outcomes, especially in VHR patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81677572021-06-02 Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Sasaki, Takeshi Nishikawa, Kouhei Kato, Manabu Masui, Satoru Yoshio, Yuko Sugimura, Yoshiki Inoue, Takahiro Med Sci (Basel) Article Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is a high rate of recurrence, and new approaches are required to improve surgical efficacy. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before RP for Japanese patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From February 2009 to April 2016, 21 high-risk patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were treated with docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) every four weeks for three cycles and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Patients with grade 3–4 toxicities had 25% dose reductions for the following course. Results: Median follow-up was 88.6 months. The dose of docetaxel was reduced in 13 patients. The estimated five-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate was 57.1%. National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (high-risk, but not very high-risk (nVHR) versus VHR) was associated with bPFS (p = 0.03). Five-year bPFS rates in the nVHR and VHR groups were 76.9% and 25.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in bPFS between the nVHR and VHR groups (p = 0.023) by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Conclusions: Although our study included a small number of cases, at least in our exploration, NCHT was safe and feasible. However, more extensive treatment modalities are needed to improve outcomes, especially in VHR patients. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8167757/ /pubmed/33918590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020024 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sasaki, Takeshi
Nishikawa, Kouhei
Kato, Manabu
Masui, Satoru
Yoshio, Yuko
Sugimura, Yoshiki
Inoue, Takahiro
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title_short Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy before Radical Prostatectomy for Japanese Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
title_sort neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy for japanese patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020024
work_keys_str_mv AT sasakitakeshi neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT nishikawakouhei neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT katomanabu neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT masuisatoru neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT yoshioyuko neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT sugimurayoshiki neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer
AT inouetakahiro neoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapybeforeradicalprostatectomyforjapanesepatientswithhighrisklocalizedprostatecancer