Cargando…

Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwaasa, Tomoya, Tensho, Keiji, Koyama, Suguru, Shimodaira, Hiroki, Horiuchi, Hiroshi, Saito, Naoto, Takahashi, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.006
_version_ 1783701767027949568
author Iwaasa, Tomoya
Tensho, Keiji
Koyama, Suguru
Shimodaira, Hiroki
Horiuchi, Hiroshi
Saito, Naoto
Takahashi, Jun
author_facet Iwaasa, Tomoya
Tensho, Keiji
Koyama, Suguru
Shimodaira, Hiroki
Horiuchi, Hiroshi
Saito, Naoto
Takahashi, Jun
author_sort Iwaasa, Tomoya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases with remnant defects. METHODS: The 105 patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into three groups. If the remnant was a Crain I-III type, remnant-preserving bone tunnel creation was attempted. After the creation of the bone tunnel, good continuity was maintained in 34 patients (preserved group). Due to lost continuity, the remnant was resected in 26 patients (resected group). No identifiable remnant continuity remained (Crain IV) in 45 patients (absent group). The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, anterior stability measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer at 2 years postoperatively, and frequency of complications were compared among the three groups. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to clarify the factors affecting postoperative anterior stability. RESULTS: The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC subjective score, and frequency of complications were not significantly different among the groups. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior stability was significantly better in the preserved group (0.3 ± 1.6 mm) compared to the resected group (1.6 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.003) and absent group (1.6 mm ± 1.7, p = 0.009). The multiple linear regression analysis showed remnant preservation significantly related to postoperative anterior stability. CONCLUSION: Although there were no differences in clinical scores, the ACL reconstruction with new preservation technique showed good anterior stability and no difference in the frequency of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81678042021-06-16 Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups Iwaasa, Tomoya Tensho, Keiji Koyama, Suguru Shimodaira, Hiroki Horiuchi, Hiroshi Saito, Naoto Takahashi, Jun Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases with remnant defects. METHODS: The 105 patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into three groups. If the remnant was a Crain I-III type, remnant-preserving bone tunnel creation was attempted. After the creation of the bone tunnel, good continuity was maintained in 34 patients (preserved group). Due to lost continuity, the remnant was resected in 26 patients (resected group). No identifiable remnant continuity remained (Crain IV) in 45 patients (absent group). The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, anterior stability measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer at 2 years postoperatively, and frequency of complications were compared among the three groups. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to clarify the factors affecting postoperative anterior stability. RESULTS: The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC subjective score, and frequency of complications were not significantly different among the groups. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior stability was significantly better in the preserved group (0.3 ± 1.6 mm) compared to the resected group (1.6 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.003) and absent group (1.6 mm ± 1.7, p = 0.009). The multiple linear regression analysis showed remnant preservation significantly related to postoperative anterior stability. CONCLUSION: Although there were no differences in clinical scores, the ACL reconstruction with new preservation technique showed good anterior stability and no difference in the frequency of complications. Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8167804/ /pubmed/34141592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.006 Text en © 2021 Asia Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Iwaasa, Tomoya
Tensho, Keiji
Koyama, Suguru
Shimodaira, Hiroki
Horiuchi, Hiroshi
Saito, Naoto
Takahashi, Jun
Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title_full Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title_fullStr Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title_short Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
title_sort clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT iwaasatomoya clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT tenshokeiji clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT koyamasuguru clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT shimodairahiroki clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT horiuchihiroshi clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT saitonaoto clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups
AT takahashijun clinicaloutcomeofanewremnantaugmentationtechniquewithanatomicaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonamongremnantpreservationresectionandabsentgroups